Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Micro Four Thirds > Olympus Pen E-P1

Olympus Pen E-P1 The first Olympus Micro Four Thirds camera.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 15th September 2009
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,565
Thanks: 421
Thanked 2,522 Times in 1,269 Posts
Likes: 862
Liked 1,695 Times in 769 Posts
Where is the improved E-P1 noise performance?

I'd be very interested to hear from anyone who has a Pen E-P1 and an older E-System DSLR and who can relate the performance of the E-P1's high ISO performance in both RAW and JPEG - with earlier E-System DSLRs, especially the E-30 and E-620, which have the same processor. I don't think there is any doubt that there is an improvement in the E-P1 thanks to its new TruePic image processor, but is the benefit only in JPEGs?

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 16th September 2009
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,565
Thanks: 421
Thanked 2,522 Times in 1,269 Posts
Likes: 862
Liked 1,695 Times in 769 Posts
Re: Where is the improved E-P1 noise performance?

I thought I would bump this - anyone?

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th September 2009
Graham_of_Rainham's Avatar
Graham_of_Rainham Graham_of_Rainham is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rainham
Posts: 8,103
Thanks: 642
Thanked 939 Times in 727 Posts
Likes: 2,263
Liked 1,580 Times in 910 Posts
Re: Where is the improved E-P1 noise performance?

I have expressed my opinion on this "High ISO" noise issue several times and still see the comparisons that many magazines do as being specifically aimed at promoting one brand over another.

Here however the question is one of improvement of a systems performance as the technology has developed, which is a valid and worthwhile question.

However: I would really like to see some reproducible results along side the anecdotal evidence that results from user trials.

All too often we see comparative images that are produced in less than ideal conditions, with variable lighting, offered as examples. What is needed is an industry agreed standard target, used in controlled conditions so that the results are reproducible.

Many of us older folk will remember the AP "Center & Edge tests" featuring the bow of a boat anchored on the Thames. The images were quite variable depending on the weather, but they were used to show a specific feature of lens performance, and had a level of standardisation that we all understood. While I'm not advocating going back to that level of testing, we do need something that is consistently recognisable and can be easily reproduced to provide good quality results.

We all know that the image itself can influence the performance, and that all the various elements of the production process affect the outcome, so unless we have some "standard test" to reduce the variables to a minimum, we really are into a fruit salad, let alone an apples & pears comparison.

__________________
Graham

We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy...

Last edited by Graham_of_Rainham; 16th September 2009 at 11:38 AM. Reason: speelin
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16th September 2009
crimbo crimbo is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shetland
Posts: 1,736
Thanks: 100
Thanked 149 Times in 130 Posts
Likes: 22
Liked 122 Times in 62 Posts
Re: Where is the improved E-P1 noise performance?

Well if you get me an EP1 to borrow with a 4/3->m4/3 adapter I will compare it for astronomy shots over the E400...yes I will give it you back afterwards!
__________________
chris
shetland
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 3rd October 2009
hgranlie hgranlie is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Denmark
Posts: 12
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Smile Re: Where is the improved E-P1 noise performance?

Recently we bought the E-P1 for my wife. We were immediately impressed by the higher ISO- performance compared to my E510. It may be at bit more noisy than eg. Nikon D300 , but images are very detailed and crisper.

There is a very good possibility for comparison here:

http://www.imaging-resource.com/IMCOMP/COMPS01.HTM

There is also a review at

http://www.imaging-resource.com/PRODS/EP1/EP1A.HTM

where the E-P1 is compared to the E30.

What I see is a significant improvement in IQ.

(I am waiting with great expectations for the successor to E30 with the same sensor and imageprocessor? That may be the update for my E510).

Hans
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Improved repair service - a different kind of wish for Watanabe-san Gwyver Announcements 5 5th April 2009 06:33 PM
dxomark.com publishes RAW performance data on the first-ever Micro Four Thirds camera, along with da Four Thirds User Articles from FourThirds-User.com 0 27th January 2009 03:20 PM
Initial look at Lumix DMC-G1 high ISO performance Four Thirds User Articles from FourThirds-User.com 6 7th November 2008 06:21 PM
Performance of the E 510 vs the E 500 dennisg Olympus E-510 11 25th June 2008 11:22 AM
Live performance .. snaarman Foto Fair 0 17th May 2008 04:18 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:10 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger