Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Show your photos > Exhibitions, stock photos, professional work

Exhibitions, stock photos, professional work This board concentrates on topics that explore the potential of your photography being seen by a wider audience and even earning you some money.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th March 2016
Ivor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
How much has the world of selling photos changed?

I have been reading, mainly just out of interest in all things photographic, an old thread from 5 years ago about selling stock images and wonder how much that world has changed since then.

I took a trip to one of the stock photo sites which boasted over 100 million images in its archives. I guess that the odds of having a photo picked from that size of pool will be tiny. Also, one of the sites insisted on uploads being an uncompressed JPEG of at least 18MB. That's larger than the raw files produced by my E-5. I guess this restriction is to try to limit the number of submissions.

Looking back at the original thread, even well established and very talented photographers were not making much from their images in this way even back then. Are stock photos a thing of the past for photographers?

Ivor
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28th March 2016
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 5,792
Thanks: 592
Thanked 421 Times in 373 Posts
Likes: 787
Liked 1,919 Times in 1,143 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

100 million is close to the odds of winning euro millions, in round terms, but one's chances are improved by the use of key words and tags.

In the smartphone age almost everyone is a photographer and images are generally transient and have low value, even to the person who took them. When I flick through Flickr most of the images grab no more than 5s of my attention before flicking to the next.

Photographs have fairly low value and it must be hard to make a living as a 'professional' unless the individual targets a specific need, eg weddings, or war zones and selling (to newspapers) an image of someone having their head blown off. Or something off guard about the Royal Family that will sell to the gutter press.

Edit: in terms of image size, I suppose anyone wishing to purchase wants the best bang for the their money, and anyway storage space is dirt cheap, so why not go big?
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28th March 2016
Ivor
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
100 million is close to the odds of winning euro millions, in round terms, but one's chances are improved by the use of key words and tags.

In the smartphone age almost everyone is a photographer and images are generally transient and have low value, even to the person who took them. When I flick through Flickr most of the images grab no more than 5s of my attention before flicking to the next.

Photographs have fairly low value and it must be hard to make a living as a 'professional' unless the individual targets a specific need, eg weddings, or war zones and selling (to newspapers) an image of someone having their head blown off. Or something off guard about the Royal Family that will sell to the gutter press.

Edit: in terms of image size, I suppose anyone wishing to purchase wants the best bang for the their money, and anyway storage space is dirt cheap, so why not go big?
That's where I'm coming from, and why I don't do the lottery.

I think the days of anyone making much at all from online images are over, unless anyone can prove me wrong. Taking away the commercialism of photography and turning it back into an art for art's sake is a good thing in my book.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28th March 2016
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A Brit now living in Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,616
Thanks: 39
Thanked 678 Times in 640 Posts
Likes: 254
Liked 1,329 Times in 798 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

It's not just the number of images in libraries, rates are in free fall and anyone not prepared to pay a few quid for an image will find something online to steal.
__________________
It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

David M's Photoblog
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 28th March 2016
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 5,792
Thanks: 592
Thanked 421 Times in 373 Posts
Likes: 787
Liked 1,919 Times in 1,143 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ivor View Post
That's where I'm coming from, and why I don't do the lottery.

I think the days of anyone making much at all from online images are over, unless anyone can prove me wrong. Taking away the commercialism of photography and turning it back into an art for art's sake is a good thing in my book.
I would be more than happy if anyone wanted one of my shots without payment. Fundamentally I 'do' photography for my own enjoyment and of course my best shot will be the one I take next, or the one after that, or the one after that or...
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28th March 2016
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,710
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,257 Times in 942 Posts
Likes: 150
Liked 6,007 Times in 1,955 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
I would be more than happy if anyone wanted one of my shots without payment. Fundamentally I 'do' photography for my own enjoyment and of course my best shot will be the one I take next, or the one after that, or the one after that or...
Steve - I think a lot of us feel the same, but in truth that's one of the reasons for the steep decline in stock image libraries. With so much excellent gear about, even rank amateurs like me can do a half decent shot of something eye catching. Hell, there are even web sites that will tell you where to stand, on what day of the year and at what time! Short of pressing the button for you, Google has all the answers.

Photography is definitely something personal now - I doubt there are any easy ways to make money from it professionally any more; except maybe school shots or weddings and I for one really can't work up any enthusiasm for that. A year doing either would probably have me running to the hills vowing never to touch a camera again!
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 29th March 2016
Zuiko's Avatar
Zuiko Zuiko is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunmow, Essex
Posts: 22,191
Thanks: 1,991
Thanked 3,175 Times in 2,480 Posts
Likes: 3,448
Liked 4,506 Times in 2,143 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
I would be more than happy if anyone wanted one of my shots without payment. Fundamentally I 'do' photography for my own enjoyment and of course my best shot will be the one I take next, or the one after that, or the one after that or...
So you manage to grab a street shot of Nigel Farage in a passionate kiss with Diane Abbott and all the tabloids want to print it. Or you capture a beautiful sunrise over a field of wheat and an advertising agency want to use it in a big new promotion of Hovis. And in either case you just let them use your picture for free?
__________________
John

"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Ivor (29th March 2016)
  #8  
Old 29th March 2016
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 5,792
Thanks: 592
Thanked 421 Times in 373 Posts
Likes: 787
Liked 1,919 Times in 1,143 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuiko View Post
So you manage to grab a street shot of Nigel Farage in a passionate kiss with Diane Abbott and all the tabloids want to print it. Or you capture a beautiful sunrise over a field of wheat and an advertising agency want to use it in a big new promotion of Hovis. And in either case you just let them use your picture for free?
Jeez, Nigel and Diane Abbott - I'd be too stunned to operate the camera! However, should I be fortunate to take such a picture I would instantly appreciate its commercial value, assuming I was the only person with a camera at the time. On the other hand, if I took a sunrise shot I'd probably put it on social media (Flickr, and/or here possibly) and wouldn't worry further, but I'd appreciate recognition if someone used it. Both situations are far fetched though: Nige has far better taste and I don't do landscapes.

This has got me thinking. Is there a business in Flickr, do the owners (Yahoo I believe) get commercial gain? Most users seem to have standard membership, ie don't pay for uploading and storage. Perhaps Yahoo intend sucking as many in and then changing the T&Cs to become a subscription.
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 29th March 2016
Petrochemist Petrochemist is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: N Essex
Posts: 741
Thanks: 36
Thanked 84 Times in 77 Posts
Likes: 218
Liked 130 Times in 95 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
I would be more than happy if anyone wanted one of my shots without payment. Fundamentally I 'do' photography for my own enjoyment and of course my best shot will be the one I take next, or the one after that, or the one after that or...
If it's for a good cause I'd be happy for it. So far the only times I'm aware of where someone has used my on-line photos it's been for their profit. I wouldn't want much in return but a little towards my lens/camera fund would seem fair to me!
__________________
Mike
Compulsive photographic Dabbler.
Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 29th March 2016
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 5,792
Thanks: 592
Thanked 421 Times in 373 Posts
Likes: 787
Liked 1,919 Times in 1,143 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petrochemist View Post
If it's for a good cause I'd be happy for it. So far the only times I'm aware of where someone has used my on-line photos it's been for their profit. I wouldn't want much in return but a little towards my lens/camera fund would seem fair to me!
Was it (or were they) pinched from Flickr?
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 29th March 2016
Zuiko's Avatar
Zuiko Zuiko is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunmow, Essex
Posts: 22,191
Thanks: 1,991
Thanked 3,175 Times in 2,480 Posts
Likes: 3,448
Liked 4,506 Times in 2,143 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
Jeez, Nigel and Diane Abbott - I'd be too stunned to operate the camera! However, should I be fortunate to take such a picture I would instantly appreciate its commercial value, assuming I was the only person with a camera at the time. On the other hand, if I took a sunrise shot I'd probably put it on social media (Flickr, and/or here possibly) and wouldn't worry further, but I'd appreciate recognition if someone used it. Both situations are far fetched though: Nige has far better taste and I don't do landscapes.
Haha, fair comment, Steve, but let's put this another way. How do you think a professional, self-employed gardener would feel if an amateur gardener in the area loved his hobby so much that he was prepared to do everyone else's gardening for free? Or how would a catering business cope if a local cooking enthusiast offered to cater at functions without charge?

The sad thing is that standards are not going up - it takes far more than just owning a top of the range digital camera to produce a really good photograph. Rather, publishers are settling for mediocre work just because they can get it for free. A good example of this is the quality of pictures used by television broadcasters as a background to their weather reports.

An indication of how recognition of the true craftsmanship of professional photographers has fallen is the current advert for the Galaxy 7 phone (or whatever it is). Apparently, it "takes pictures like a pro." So there you have it, Samsung believe that the technology has finally taken over and photographers are now redundant, no wonder they are pulling out of camera manufacturing.
__________________
John

"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 29th March 2016
benvendetta's Avatar
benvendetta benvendetta is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pontypool, South Wales
Posts: 3,748
Thanks: 83
Thanked 297 Times in 262 Posts
Likes: 167
Liked 339 Times in 229 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

If a company is making money directly or indirectly from my images, I would expect payment.
__________________
Dave

E-M1 Mk2, Pen F, HLD-9, 17, 25, 45, 60 macro, 12-40 Pro, 40-150 Pro, 12-50, 40-150, 75-300, MC-14, MMF-3 (all micro 4/3rds), 7-14 (4/3rds), 50, 135 (OM), GoPro Hero 3, Novo/Giottos/ Manfrotto supports. Lowepro, Tamrac, Manfrotto, and Billingham bags.

External Competition Secretary, Cwmbran PS & Welsh Photographic Federation Judge
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 29th March 2016
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A Brit now living in Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,616
Thanks: 39
Thanked 678 Times in 640 Posts
Likes: 254
Liked 1,329 Times in 798 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuiko View Post
So you manage to grab a street shot of Nigel Farage in a passionate kiss with Diane Abbott and all the tabloids want to print it. Or you capture a beautiful sunrise over a field of wheat and an advertising agency want to use it in a big new promotion of Hovis. And in either case you just let them use your picture for free?
Stop pretending to be surprised John, we both know that is one of the reasons photography is so devalued these days.

I'm waiting for someone to ask how much they should pay a client to use a photo.
__________________
It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

David M's Photoblog
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 29th March 2016
Zuiko's Avatar
Zuiko Zuiko is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunmow, Essex
Posts: 22,191
Thanks: 1,991
Thanked 3,175 Times in 2,480 Posts
Likes: 3,448
Liked 4,506 Times in 2,143 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

Quote:
Originally Posted by David M View Post
Stop pretending to be surprised John, we both know that is one of the reasons photography is so devalued these days.

I'm waiting for someone to ask how much they should pay a client to use a photo.
Exactly....
__________________
John

"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 29th March 2016
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A Brit now living in Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,616
Thanks: 39
Thanked 678 Times in 640 Posts
Likes: 254
Liked 1,329 Times in 798 Posts
Re: How much has the world of selling photos changed?

To get back to the original post, a friend with a specialist agency has seen his quarterly sales drop from five figures to three figures over the past couple of decades. One of his images was licensed for 5. Not a bad as a friend of his with the same agency who got 3 for the use of an image.
__________________
It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

David M's Photoblog
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Forum appearance changed Ricoh The lounge 9 17th April 2015 10:02 AM
7 photos that changed fashion Graham_of_Rainham The lounge 10 9th August 2014 08:30 AM
Olympus Repair Address changed davidfarquhar The lounge 2 14th February 2014 12:22 PM
Has our country changed so much...? theMusicMan Foto Fair 11 3rd June 2012 12:44 PM
Has anyone changed from an E-3 to an E-620? E-3 Olympus E-620/600 19 17th April 2010 04:32 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:32 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger