Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > General photography discussion

General photography discussion Please look for a specific board to start your thread but if you can't find an appropriate one, post it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th August 2019
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 14,289
Thanks: 1,004
Thanked 780 Times in 724 Posts
Likes: 7,181
Liked 4,054 Times in 1,861 Posts
Loss of Exif

Can you retain exif after Photoshop stacking....???
__________________
Mark Johnson

My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 17th August 2019
peak4's Avatar
peak4 peak4 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Buxton, Derbyshire.
Posts: 1,728
Thanks: 131
Thanked 223 Times in 188 Posts
Likes: 221
Liked 195 Times in 130 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ224 View Post
Can you retain exif after Photoshop stacking....???
Personally I wouldn't know, never having used Photoshop, however I would have thought a possibility would be to use Phil Harvey's EXIFTOOL to cope the exif data from one file in the pre-stack and paste/write it into the final stacked photo.

Off out to prune some bushes now, so don't have time to look up the syntax myself, but it's a very powerful program.

Also look up Exiftool GUI in your favourite search engine, for a more accessible interface.
__________________
Best Regards
Bill

The nearest I have to a home page.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/peak4/
They're Watching You!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to peak4 For This Useful Post:
MJ224 (17th August 2019)
  #3  
Old 17th August 2019
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 14,289
Thanks: 1,004
Thanked 780 Times in 724 Posts
Likes: 7,181
Liked 4,054 Times in 1,861 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Tell us more about the prune bushes....

Thanks for info, I will look into it. I am surprised that Photoshop does not pass on the Exif data, despite stacking..., but there you go.....
__________________
Mark Johnson

My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th August 2019
wornish's Avatar
wornish wornish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 6,293
Thanks: 356
Thanked 565 Times in 444 Posts
Likes: 3,001
Liked 1,655 Times in 817 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ224 View Post
Can you retain exif after Photoshop stacking....???
Unfortunately, I think you do lose most of it. In fact, in Photoshop if you select File > File Info it will show you what's left.
__________________
Dave

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wornish For This Useful Post:
MJ224 (17th August 2019)
  #5  
Old 17th August 2019
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 14,289
Thanks: 1,004
Thanked 780 Times in 724 Posts
Likes: 7,181
Liked 4,054 Times in 1,861 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif



Agapantha with exif


by Mark Johnson, on Flickr

Now this has retained Exif, by stacking with CombineZ-P......It has stacked pretty well as well...:-)
__________________
Mark Johnson

My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Angelica (16th October 2019), Internaut (17th October 2019), wornish (17th August 2019)
  #6  
Old 17th August 2019
wornish's Avatar
wornish wornish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 6,293
Thanks: 356
Thanked 565 Times in 444 Posts
Likes: 3,001
Liked 1,655 Times in 817 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ224 View Post

by Mark Johnson, on Flickr

Now this has retained Exif, by stacking with CombineZ-P......It has stacked pretty well as well...:-)
Lovely colours and very nice dof. As you say stacked with CombineZP it keeps the Exif info. Will remember that for future use.
__________________
Dave

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wornish For This Useful Post:
MJ224 (17th August 2019)
  #7  
Old 19th August 2019
blu-by-u blu-by-u is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Selangor, Malaysia
Posts: 1,997
Thanks: 231
Thanked 107 Times in 93 Posts
Likes: 370
Liked 709 Times in 378 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

The EXIF is retained in Affinity Photo BUT only the EXIF of the 1st photo

A stack of 10 images to produce this "smooth" flow. The EXIF shows /2.8, 1/160s & ISO 200

__________________
* Henry
* Location: Subang Jaya, Selangor
* Malaysia


All my garbage so far.
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
AMc (19th August 2019), Angelica (16th October 2019), MJ224 (19th August 2019), OM USer (19th August 2019)
  #8  
Old 15th October 2019
Harold Gough Harold Gough is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Reading UK
Posts: 5,980
Thanks: 59
Thanked 847 Times in 772 Posts
Likes: 41
Liked 3,388 Times in 1,824 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ224 View Post
Can you retain exif after Photoshop stacking....???
Maybe it will be there but inaccessible. I can't access EXIF data, although it gives a date, in stereo pairs.

Harold
__________________
The body is willing but the mind is weak.
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 15th October 2019
Harold Gough Harold Gough is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Reading UK
Posts: 5,980
Thanks: 59
Thanked 847 Times in 772 Posts
Likes: 41
Liked 3,388 Times in 1,824 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Quote:
Originally Posted by wornish View Post
Unfortunately, I think you do lose most of it. In fact, in Photoshop if you select File > File Info it will show you what's left.
I read mine in FastStone Viewer.

Harold
__________________
The body is willing but the mind is weak.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16th October 2019
Angelica's Avatar
Angelica Angelica is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 177
Thanks: 22
Thanked 4 Times in 3 Posts
Likes: 91
Liked 40 Times in 16 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Quote:
Originally Posted by blu-by-u View Post
...
A stack of 10 images to produce this "smooth" flow. The EXIF shows /2.8, 1/160s & ISO 200
I never tried stacking and not sure I understand what it's about but your results inspire me to find out more.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 16th October 2019
MikeOxon MikeOxon is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: oxford
Posts: 624
Thanks: 61
Thanked 109 Times in 95 Posts
Likes: 64
Liked 251 Times in 157 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Usually, one stacks photos in order to change something throughout the stack, so the photo data will not be the same for each individual shot. It seems that Photoshop always 'loses' some EXIF data, even on a single shot. Try comparing the results from the EXIF Tool before and after Photoshop. I find, for example, that focus distance information is removed.
__________________
Mike
visit my Natural History Photos website:
http://www.botanicdesign.co.uk/Natur...story/home.htm
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 16th October 2019
OM USer's Avatar
OM USer OM USer is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: London
Posts: 12,522
Thanks: 2,451
Thanked 1,547 Times in 1,471 Posts
Likes: 6,467
Liked 1,459 Times in 933 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

If one opened up the first image in a new Photoshop session and then just copied in the stacked image over the top as a second layer then will all the EXIF from the first image (background/base layer) be retained when you save as JPEG??
__________________
Cameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, M.ZD 40-150 F4-5.6 R, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
Learn something new every day
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 16th October 2019
Petrochemist Petrochemist is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: N Essex
Posts: 744
Thanks: 37
Thanked 85 Times in 78 Posts
Likes: 218
Liked 133 Times in 96 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Quote:
Originally Posted by MikeOxon View Post
Usually, one stacks photos in order to change something throughout the stack, so the photo data will not be the same for each individual shot. It seems that Photoshop always 'loses' some EXIF data, even on a single shot. Try comparing the results from the EXIF Tool before and after Photoshop. I find, for example, that focus distance information is removed.
At least one value will change every time you do a stack.


Focus distance or focal length will change for focus stacking.
Aperture/effective ISO/shutter speed will change for HDR type stacking.
Most of the time the time/date stamp will change (doing HDR for a single raw file is the only exception I know) this covers panoramas, astro type noise stacking & pseudo ND stacking...


Unfortunately I've found most stacking software will remove far more EXIF than just the values that are changing. Copying the data back form one of the original files is the best method I've found to get it roughly right, perhaps followed by manual editing to alter the values changed by the stacking operation.
__________________
Mike
Compulsive photographic Dabbler.
Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 17th October 2019
blu-by-u blu-by-u is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Selangor, Malaysia
Posts: 1,997
Thanks: 231
Thanked 107 Times in 93 Posts
Likes: 370
Liked 709 Times in 378 Posts
Re: Loss of Exif

Quote:
Originally Posted by Angelica View Post
I never tried stacking and not sure I understand what it's about but your results inspire me to find out more.
I was experimenting into stacking as an alternative to using an ND or some light cutting filter to get that smooth silky waterfall look.

As it was a bright day, harsh light and all, and bummer me, did not bring any ND or CPL with me, But I did bring my tripod. so set, frame and shot off 10 images.

What I noticed was the leaves are more visible instead of blurred from long exposure. The water was not that smooth as with long exposure but white enough for the flowing effect.

It seems that this could also be done with the Super High Resolution mode. But unfortunately I did not try that then.
__________________
* Henry
* Location: Subang Jaya, Selangor
* Malaysia


All my garbage so far.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Angelica (17th October 2019)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Another big loss to the UK Graham_of_Rainham The lounge 117 5th November 2017 03:06 PM
New Year Weight Loss? Miketoll The lounge 5 9th January 2016 05:21 PM
Memory card loss? jamsa Olympus OM-D E-M5 8 1st May 2013 11:31 AM
Colour saturation loss. David Morison Software 6 5th January 2011 11:59 AM
Photographers' loss. Barr1e The lounge 0 16th February 2008 11:38 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:28 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger