Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > General photography discussion

General photography discussion Please look for a specific board to start your thread but if you can't find an appropriate one, post it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 23rd April 2019
Internaut Internaut is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,986
Thanks: 329
Thanked 314 Times in 293 Posts
Likes: 1,582
Liked 686 Times in 296 Posts
Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

And actually wondering if the OOC JPEG has had its day, at least for the enthusiast/pro level photographers.... With the Pen F, and recent Adobe enhancements to its software I see two conflicting phenomena:
  • A bewilderingly customisable JPEG engine, to the extent I never seem to take just one image of a scene.
  • One click raw processing (Adobe Sensei combined with Adobe's greatly enhanced raw profiles) that mostly seems to get it right or close to right.

In other words, I think we find ourselves in a place where shootig to output (JPEG) can actually be more effort than shooting to develop (raw).

Oddly, this brings me to my own Leica bug (which I'm determined not to spend any hard earned money on) because Leica actually made a digital M with no LCD screen that shoots DNG only.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 23rd April 2019
Graham_of_Rainham's Avatar
Graham_of_Rainham Graham_of_Rainham is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rainham
Posts: 8,103
Thanks: 642
Thanked 939 Times in 727 Posts
Likes: 2,263
Liked 1,580 Times in 910 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

Considering that jpg is an agreed system for compression of data, what that data is and represents can be anything, but for us is invariably an image. How the camera manipulated the sensor data, is highly variable by the user, and always down to individual requirements.

Personally I shoot RAW + JPG with the jpg file containing the data of a 1024 x 768 image with all the camera controls set to factory default. That way I can view these “thumbnails” purely for selection of images that are then processed from the ORFs. Much like a contact sheet was made back in the day...

If I ever need a large jpg file, that gets produced by DXO Optics Pro from the RAW file.
__________________
Graham

We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy...
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 23rd April 2019
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,710
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,257 Times in 942 Posts
Likes: 150
Liked 5,995 Times in 1,953 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

I've been shooting raw exclusively since about 2011. Properly learning PP skills is a vital tool if you want to get your images to be more than snapshots imho. I see so many shots posted online that look flat and lifeless where a little PP would have helped enormously. PP on JPEGs is very limiting so raw really is the only sensible approach.

I'd go so far as to say that raw + PP is essential if you want to consistently produce images that are more than snapshots.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
DerekW (24th April 2019), Grumpy Hec (24th April 2019), MJ224 (23rd April 2019), Naughty Nigel (25th April 2019)
  #4  
Old 23rd April 2019
Tram Tram is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 337
Thanks: 18
Thanked 31 Times in 28 Posts
Likes: 26
Liked 110 Times in 73 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham_of_Rainham View Post
Considering that jpg is an agreed system for compression of data, what that data is and represents can be anything, but for us is invariably an image. How the camera manipulated the sensor data, is highly variable by the user, and always down to individual requirements.

Personally I shoot RAW + JPG with the jpg file containing the data of a 1024 x 768 image with all the camera controls set to factory default. That way I can view these “thumbnails” purely for selection of images that are then processed from the ORFs. Much like a contact sheet was made back in the day...

If I ever need a large jpg file, that gets produced by DXO Optics Pro from the RAW file.
Do something very similar myself, use the jpegs to whittle down numbers.
Keeper raw files then get processed in Lightroom ready for printing, I do use some tweaked jpegs for displaying on the web.
Storage and ram is so cheap no reason in my opinion not to use both.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24th April 2019
Phill D's Avatar
Phill D Phill D is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 9,805
Thanks: 1,181
Thanked 1,406 Times in 1,298 Posts
Likes: 1,025
Liked 2,339 Times in 1,111 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

I do something similar to both of you too. I just didn't think of reducing the jpg saved file size down to save space, Doh! that's a great but obvious tip wish I'd thought of it myself before. Thanks Graham and Tram.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 25th April 2019
Naughty Nigel's Avatar
Naughty Nigel Naughty Nigel is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Land of the Prince Bishops
Posts: 9,557
Thanks: 385
Thanked 547 Times in 462 Posts
Likes: 3,316
Liked 2,279 Times in 1,506 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

Like others here I use ORF files almost exclusively, but for work purposes I also save a JPG file at 1600 x 1200.

Apart from being useful for selection purposes the JPG files are small enough to be saved to DropBox and uploaded before travelling home. That way, even if I somehow managed to lose everything I would still have useable image files with enough detail and resolution to use in my reports.
__________________
---------------

Naughty Nigel


Difficult is worth doing
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 25th April 2019
JonSchick JonSchick is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: London
Posts: 687
Thanks: 3
Thanked 64 Times in 55 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 105 Times in 36 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

Hmmm I'm going to put the cat amongst the pigeons here.... Mostly I use Fuji bodies and having set up the JPEGs the way I like them, I hardly ever use raw. Raw + JPEG for important shoots but even then the raws are generally kept just in case - the JPEGs have been good enough for commercial use eg theatre flyers and I've better things to do with my time than spend a lot of it doing PP on the computer! Blue touch paper well and truly lit
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25th April 2019
Naughty Nigel's Avatar
Naughty Nigel Naughty Nigel is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Land of the Prince Bishops
Posts: 9,557
Thanks: 385
Thanked 547 Times in 462 Posts
Likes: 3,316
Liked 2,279 Times in 1,506 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

Quote:
Originally Posted by JonSchick View Post
Hmmm I'm going to put the cat amongst the pigeons here.... Mostly I use Fuji bodies and having set up the JPEGs the way I like them, I hardly ever use raw. Raw + JPEG for important shoots but even then the raws are generally kept just in case - the JPEGs have been good enough for commercial use eg theatre flyers and I've better things to do with my time than spend a lot of it doing PP on the computer! Blue touch paper well and truly lit
The fact is that most photographs end up as Jpegs unless they are printed.

If your subject matter allows in camera processing then all well and good, but even with the Jpeg defaults set to my liking the output simply doesn't meet my needs. For starters the lack of an in-camera ND grad filter is a major limitation for me.
__________________
---------------

Naughty Nigel


Difficult is worth doing
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25th April 2019
shenstone's Avatar
shenstone shenstone is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 3,372
Thanks: 166
Thanked 318 Times in 242 Posts
Likes: 408
Liked 506 Times in 280 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

I shoot ORF + full sized JPEGs.

Cards and Disk are cheap, and if I can use the OOC full sized for something (which for many of the purposes I need them are absolutely fine, then it's there with no further effort. I use DXO when I want to get something more from the ORF.

regards
Andy
__________________
My Kit (OK I'm a hoarder...)
4/3 E500, E510, E30 + 35macro, 50macro, 7-14, 11-22, 14-45 (x2), 14-54, 40-150 (both types), 50-200, 70-300, 50-500,
m 4/3 EM1MkII + 60 macro, 12-100 Pro
FL20, FL36 x2 , FL50, cactus slaves etc.
The Boss (Mrs Shenstone) E620, EM10-II, 14-41Ez, 40-150R, 9 cap and whatever she can nick from me when she wants it

My places
http://www.shenstone.me.uk
http://landroverkaty.blogspot.com/
https://vimeo.com/shenstone
http://cardiffnaturalists.org.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 26th April 2019
Internaut Internaut is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,986
Thanks: 329
Thanked 314 Times in 293 Posts
Likes: 1,582
Liked 686 Times in 296 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

Quote:
Originally Posted by shenstone View Post
I shoot ORF + full sized JPEGs.

Cards and Disk are cheap, and if I can use the OOC full sized for something (which for many of the purposes I need them are absolutely fine, then it's there with no further effort. I use DXO when I want to get something more from the ORF.

regards
Andy
Likewise. I shoot both and pick whichever works best in the moment.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 26th April 2019
Naughty Nigel's Avatar
Naughty Nigel Naughty Nigel is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Land of the Prince Bishops
Posts: 9,557
Thanks: 385
Thanked 547 Times in 462 Posts
Likes: 3,316
Liked 2,279 Times in 1,506 Posts
Re: Ruminating on raw vs JPEG...

The Jpeg files are quick and easy to browse through to see which are keepers and which have potential.

It would be handy if on deleting the Jpeg of 'no hopers' that the ORF file could also be deleted.
__________________
---------------

Naughty Nigel


Difficult is worth doing
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
ORF or JPEG? sapper Looking for improvement 14 1st July 2014 10:59 AM
Jpeg/Raw Wayne1 Olympus OM-D E-M1 5 18th April 2014 12:31 PM
RAW and JPEG in LR4? David Morison Software 3 13th July 2012 07:34 PM
JPEG vs raw Bikie John Software 5 2nd May 2012 12:22 PM
Raw to jpeg monoboard Software 2 27th February 2011 04:00 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:34 AM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger