Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Micro Four Thirds > Olympus OM-D E-M1

Olympus OM-D E-M1 The first Micro Four Thirds camera that offers phase detect focusing so you can use Four Thirds DSLR lenses normally as well a Micro Four Thirds lenses.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 17th October 2013
StephenL's Avatar
StephenL StephenL is offline
Senior Pixelmonger
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 984
Thanked 1,126 Times in 921 Posts
Likes: 658
Liked 755 Times in 499 Posts
On the point of ditching ...

... the taking of raw images. As is my practice with a new camera, I take the first load of shots with raw+jpeg. More so if, like the E-M1, Lightroom's raw converter is only in beta stage.

As it stands, I can't tell the difference between the two once they're imported into Lightroom. The jpegs are just so good. Of course, it could be that when Adobe have finished polishing the raw converter I'll be able to get more out of raw than at present, but for now jpeg seems just as good. I can still import the jpeg files into LR the same way, and process them more-or-less the same, and the originals are still untouched.

But, coupled with the amount of fine tuning you can now do in-camera, I may well stick with jpeg.

Anyone else feel the same way?
__________________
Stephen

A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

My Flickr site
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
paullus (17th October 2013)
  #2  
Old 17th October 2013
birdboy birdboy is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 349
Thanked 237 Times in 200 Posts
Likes: 182
Liked 331 Times in 159 Posts
Re: On the point of ditching ...

What I suspect is happening is that LR takes your files applies all the jpg settings (constrast sharpness saturation etc) from the exif info and produces a picture as if it was a jpg produced from the camera, so is it really any surprise that you cannot see any difference. What may make a difference is if you applied exposure corrections to the raw files and then the same to the jpgs. Be interested to know.
__________________
John

OM-D E-M1, 12-40 f2.8 Pro, Tamron 14-150mm f5.8, E5, E3, Zuiko 50-200mm SWD, Zuiko 12-60mm SWD, Zuiko ED 70-300mm f5.6, 50mmf2, Zuiko ED 9-18mm f5.6, Sigma 50-500mm f6.3, EC14, EC20, RM-1, VA-1
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 17th October 2013
StephenL's Avatar
StephenL StephenL is offline
Senior Pixelmonger
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 984
Thanked 1,126 Times in 921 Posts
Likes: 658
Liked 755 Times in 499 Posts
Re: On the point of ditching ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by birdboy View Post
What I suspect is happening is that LR takes your files applies all the jpg settings (constrast sharpness saturation etc) from the exif info and produces a picture as if it was a jpg produced from the camera, so is it really any surprise that you cannot see any difference. What may make a difference is if you applied exposure corrections to the raw files and then the same to the jpgs. Be interested to know.
That's not what I find with the M5. There, the raw files are flat until processed. LR takes the raw files pure and simple.
__________________
Stephen

A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

My Flickr site
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 17th October 2013
birdboy birdboy is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,375
Thanks: 349
Thanked 237 Times in 200 Posts
Likes: 182
Liked 331 Times in 159 Posts
Re: On the point of ditching ...

From what I have read on the subject of raw files the consensus of experts say that there is no such thing and that all so called raw files need some form of tinkering in order to be displayed. It may be that the tinkering that is applied to the EM5 is different to that which is currently applied to the EM1 beta. I do not normally like to get involved in what's happening (because I don't know) and I only offered it as something you may like to consider. Your observation that both files appear the same whereas they do not with the EM5 would is interesting. In what way does the EM5 files appear different?
__________________
John

OM-D E-M1, 12-40 f2.8 Pro, Tamron 14-150mm f5.8, E5, E3, Zuiko 50-200mm SWD, Zuiko 12-60mm SWD, Zuiko ED 70-300mm f5.6, 50mmf2, Zuiko ED 9-18mm f5.6, Sigma 50-500mm f6.3, EC14, EC20, RM-1, VA-1
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 17th October 2013
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,590
Thanks: 425
Thanked 2,525 Times in 1,272 Posts
Likes: 870
Liked 1,706 Times in 773 Posts
Re: On the point of ditching ...

At the risk of trying to teach you how to suck eggs - the RAW converter initial view is really just the starting point. I can almost always make improvements and there is much more lee-way than when trying to fettle JPEGs.

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Alpha1 (18th October 2013), brian1208 (17th October 2013)
  #6  
Old 17th October 2013
StephenL's Avatar
StephenL StephenL is offline
Senior Pixelmonger
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 984
Thanked 1,126 Times in 921 Posts
Likes: 658
Liked 755 Times in 499 Posts
Re: On the point of ditching ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
At the risk of trying to teach you how to suck eggs - the RAW converter initial view is really just the starting point. I can almost always make improvements and there is much more lee-way than when trying to fettle JPEGs.

Ian
You're right, but I still think the M1 makes a better fist of the jpegs than any previous Oly. I suspect I will notice a difference when A) I try to correct more extreme shots, and/or B) when the Adobe raw converter is finalised.
__________________
Stephen

A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

My Flickr site
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 17th October 2013
ian p's Avatar
ian p ian p is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Munich
Posts: 492
Thanks: 19
Thanked 58 Times in 48 Posts
Likes: 4
Liked 148 Times in 93 Posts
Re: On the point of ditching ...

If you look at histogram of the E-M5 OOC JPGs you will see the camera has made an automatic decision on where to take the best data. But this is no good in the extreme cases, or where you were unlucky with the exposure. The raw is the only way to get a decent result because you manually decide.

It seems for your cases the automatic decision is fine. If you never ever exceed that, you aren't trying hard enough to take tricky exposures.
__________________
Olympus OM-D E-M5 mk3. Yes I'm ahead of you!
My Pics Digikam, Gimp, Kubuntu Inkscape
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 18th October 2013
theMusicMan's Avatar
theMusicMan theMusicMan is offline
E-3 Enthusiast....:)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Wales
Posts: 5,878
Thanks: 143
Thanked 267 Times in 178 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Re: On the point of ditching ...

RAW is always better. OK, if you're satisfied with the OOC JPG's when they arrive into LR, then of course that's fine. Job done.

Stephen: Are you applying any develop preset on import of your images from your card/camera into Lightroom? Have you done a side by side comparison of the RAW and JPG using the C command in Lightroom?

Usually, when one imports into Lightroom, the RAW is just that, i.e. a raw file with no settings applied.

@ Birdboy: The only tweaking that takes place is internal to the camera as it has to create a small jpg from the raw image so that this in camera generated jpg can be displayed on the screen of the camera.
__________________
John

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to theMusicMan For This Useful Post:
birdboy (19th October 2013)
  #9  
Old 18th October 2013
StephenL's Avatar
StephenL StephenL is offline
Senior Pixelmonger
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 984
Thanked 1,126 Times in 921 Posts
Likes: 658
Liked 755 Times in 499 Posts
Re: On the point of ditching ...

Quote:
Originally Posted by theMusicMan View Post

Stephen: Are you applying any develop preset on import of your images from your card/camera into Lightroom? Have you done a side by side comparison of the RAW and JPG using the C command in Lightroom?
No, never use the develop preset function, and yes, I have compared them side by side. I shall continue using raw, but the ooc jpegs are really good - most of the time. The raw files don't look as washed out, or raw, as from the M5.
__________________
Stephen

A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

My Flickr site
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Vanishing point fridgemagnet Foto Fair 1 5th March 2011 12:46 PM
Why are they ditching the Bigma? Melaka Foto Fair 7 10th May 2010 05:30 AM
Near Crisis point shenstone The lounge 1 26th October 2009 03:26 PM
What is the point in looking for perfection? EH1 The lounge 40 22nd October 2009 07:35 AM
What is the point... OlyFlyer The lounge 9 27th January 2008 10:56 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:10 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger