Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Micro Four Thirds > Olympus OM-D E-M5

Olympus OM-D E-M5 The first Micro Four Thirds camera from Olympus with an integrated Electronic Viewfinder

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 24th September 2012
Ken Lister Ken Lister is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 231
Thanks: 8
Thanked 7 Times in 5 Posts
Likes: 3
Liked 3 Times in 2 Posts
Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

Posted today on Ephotozine- result comparison of Full Frame Nikon D800 and OMD-EM5.
http://www.ephotozine.com/article/ni...mparison-20255

I am really surprised at the conclusion that a 36mp full frame camera with four times the sensor surface area and costing more than twice as much (body only) than the 16mp OMD-EM5 produces better low light performance at high ISO settings.
I'd bet that everyone else is surprised as well.

I can't wait to see how the Nikon D800 compares to a £20 6mp compact!

Nothing like a level playing field eh?

Ken
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 24th September 2012
Zuiko's Avatar
Zuiko Zuiko is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunmow, Essex
Posts: 22,190
Thanks: 1,991
Thanked 3,175 Times in 2,480 Posts
Likes: 3,448
Liked 4,505 Times in 2,142 Posts
Re: Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

It's rather like comparing a 35mm film Nikon SLR to a Hasselblad!
__________________
John

"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there — even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 24th September 2012
brian1208 brian1208 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dorset
Posts: 4,561
Thanks: 825
Thanked 928 Times in 741 Posts
Likes: 1,962
Liked 1,327 Times in 625 Posts
Re: Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

what suprised me was how well the EM-5 compared, makes me wonder of the D800 + lens is worth 4 - 6 X the price of the EM-5 + 9-18!
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 24th September 2012
RogerMac RogerMac is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Reading
Posts: 478
Thanks: 18
Thanked 38 Times in 29 Posts
Likes: 10
Liked 36 Times in 18 Posts
Re: Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

Quote:
Originally Posted by brian1208 View Post
what suprised me was how well the EM-5 compared, makes me wonder of the D800 + lens is worth 4 - 6 X the price of the EM-5 + 9-18!
^^^^^WHS^^^^^

Roger
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 24th September 2012
Graham_of_Rainham's Avatar
Graham_of_Rainham Graham_of_Rainham is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rainham
Posts: 8,190
Thanks: 647
Thanked 945 Times in 733 Posts
Likes: 2,298
Liked 1,606 Times in 928 Posts
Re: Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

More and more, I find these comparisons have gone this way in absence of any meaningfull objective assessment.

Considering the end product of most cameras, is viewed on an iPad, HDTV or at best printed to A4, what's the point of all the excess.

Why not compare a BMW M5 with an AUDI A5 on a round trip of the M25 It's much the same with the supercars being firstly limited to 155 MPH, then used in country with a 70MPH limit.

Years ago we did see an honest comparison that was done between a Digital Medium Format and a Canon G10, where the results were printed to A4 size and several top professionals were unable to tell the difference.

Perhaps the very low number of comments that are made to these "Reviews" reflects on the quality of the comparison.
__________________
Graham

We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy...
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 24th September 2012
cinders's Avatar
cinders cinders is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 890
Thanks: 138
Thanked 28 Times in 27 Posts
Likes: 304
Liked 47 Times in 16 Posts
Re: Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

I just showed the images to my partner and he actually preferred the Olympus versions!
__________________
Cindy

Cameras: EM1 MK2 and Mk1, E-620, E-410, Om4Ti
Lenses: 12-60, 50-200, Panny 100-400, 9-18, ZD 50mm, 14-54 Mk1, 70-300, 40-150, 14-42, OM 50mm F3.5 macro
Also: EC14, EX25, FS35, Vanguard tripod, and far too many bags!

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
"The air of heaven is that which flows between a horse's ears...."
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 24th September 2012
Stewart G's Avatar
Stewart G Stewart G is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: California
Posts: 792
Thanks: 34
Thanked 95 Times in 89 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 38 Times in 24 Posts
Some of these uneven comparisons are, I think, designed to be merely traffic pumps for the hosting site. So the more controversial the better.
__________________
http://technopeasant.org
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 25th September 2012
David Morison's Avatar
David Morison David Morison is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fulbeck, Lincolnshire
Posts: 3,507
Thanks: 71
Thanked 588 Times in 472 Posts
Likes: 48
Liked 298 Times in 175 Posts
Re: Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

Well I managed to talk to the judge at a local competition in which I did quite well. A couple of my land/sea scapes, at A4 and taken with the E-M5 drew his attention for the amount of detail and he asked if they were taken with a full frame. He laughed and said I was pulling his leg when I told him they were taken with m43, I think he still doesn't believe me!

Horses for courses!

David
__________________
PBase Galleries:-http://www.pbase.com/davidmorisonimages
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 25th September 2012
brian1208 brian1208 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dorset
Posts: 4,561
Thanks: 825
Thanked 928 Times in 741 Posts
Likes: 1,962
Liked 1,327 Times in 625 Posts
Re: Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

In a recent Digitally Projected Image comp one of my EM-5 shots was given the highest score of the night. That's a 6ft wide projected image compared to others from 5Dmk2s, 7Ds, D3 etc

I do think that it is now fast approaching the point where, excepting those really challenging photographic situations, it almost doesn't matter what camera you use, so long as you use it correctly
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 25th September 2012
throt throt is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Estonia
Posts: 56
Thanks: 2
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Likes: 3
Liked 9 Times in 8 Posts
Re: Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

I'd say that review was waste of time. 1st the images were not taken with similar settings. Then accuse sensor for flare and complain high iso quality compared to 4 times bigger sensor.
But the worst is that introduction and verdict are abit contradictory. Looks like he started writing how good Olympus is and then saw his Nikon bag
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 25th September 2012
Graham_of_Rainham's Avatar
Graham_of_Rainham Graham_of_Rainham is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rainham
Posts: 8,190
Thanks: 647
Thanked 945 Times in 733 Posts
Likes: 2,298
Liked 1,606 Times in 928 Posts
Lightbulb Re: Surprise result Nikon D800vOMD E5

With the passing of Projected Slide Competitions, most clubs went over to the Normal 4:3 Resolution of XGA 1024 x 768 = 786,000 pixels

Many are now using the higher SXGA+ 1400 x 1050 = 1,470,000 pixels, with a few using UXGA 1600 x 1200 = 1,920,000 pixels.

Some clubs have adopted Multi-Media Projectors for AV and Video presentation and use them, either switched to a 4:3 resolution to maintain aspect ratio, or the image is "mounted" within a plain background of the full projectors resolution.

Widescreen (16:10) Resolutions

WXGA - 1280 x 800 = 1,024,000

WUXGA - 1920 x 1200 = 2,304,000

Widescreen (16:9) Resolutions

720p - 1280 x 720 = 921,600

1080p - 1920 x 1080 = 2,073,600

When any image is re-sized, the way in which the reduction is made by the software will make a significant difference to the end result. It is for this reason that there are a variety of algorithms that do this for us.

Effectively the high resolution cameras are having much of the quality "interpolated" down to a common denominator for these competitions and much of the time by software that is not manufacturer specific, so produces a compromise result based on their criteria rather than that of the original image processor output.

Arguably the image is no longer that of a Canon, Nikon, etc., it is now one of Lightroom, PhotoShop, Picasa, etc...

Added to that the increasing use of HDR, Tone Mapping & Art Filters, anyone attributing an image to a camera and expecting it in some way to confer quality, really is kidding themselves as well as trying to kid others.

There are not that many people that have projectors at home, in the same way that we did with slides, and often will "show" their pictures on a TV or Monitor. Because of this I often here the comment made: "It looked a lot better/different to that at home". One of the main comments is colour difference.

Interestingly, I still come across clubs using old screens that were used for slides that have "Non-white" reflective surfaces.

All good clean fun...

__________________
Graham

We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy...
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Challenge 48 - Result dbutch Photo challenges 5 22nd August 2012 12:34 PM
Montage - The Result Zuiko Foto Fair 4 24th July 2012 07:50 PM
Unintentional result hruissen Looking for improvement 3 13th October 2011 08:56 AM
first result of a newbe,,,,,, satelio Foto Fair 2 5th May 2011 10:12 AM
Another Olympus First....A Right Result ndl0071 Foto Fair 9 22nd October 2008 07:30 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:00 PM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger