Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Site news and information > Announcements

Announcements E-System news releases.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4th April 2019
raichea raichea is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 677
Thanks: 87
Thanked 114 Times in 94 Posts
Likes: 103
Liked 115 Times in 78 Posts
A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

https://www.olympus-global.com/news/2019/nr01198.html
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4th April 2019
RobEW RobEW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,019
Thanks: 162
Thanked 74 Times in 68 Posts
Likes: 1,182
Liked 187 Times in 128 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

Yes, I read that. Didn't even realise Sharp were in the camera market. Di they mainly do camcorders?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4th April 2019
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,710
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,257 Times in 942 Posts
Likes: 150
Liked 5,995 Times in 1,953 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

8k video = 34Mp minimum. New sensor!
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Internaut (5th April 2019)
  #4  
Old 5th April 2019
Internaut Internaut is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,986
Thanks: 329
Thanked 314 Times in 293 Posts
Likes: 1,582
Liked 686 Times in 296 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

Let’s see what kind of sensor Sharp come up with, and how much they’re prepared to sell it for. Like most of the other manufacturers, Olympus don’t make thier own sensors. A spectacular high res sensor, that Olympus can buy, is surely THE dream for any gear headed Olyphile?
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 5th April 2019
raichea raichea is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 677
Thanks: 87
Thanked 114 Times in 94 Posts
Likes: 103
Liked 115 Times in 78 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Internaut View Post
Letís see what kind of sensor Sharp come up with, and how much theyíre prepared to sell it for. Like most of the other manufacturers, Olympus donít make thier own sensors. A spectacular high res sensor, that Olympus can buy, is surely THE dream for any gear headed Olyphile?
I'm quite happy with 20 megapixels - the print size possible with 20MP is plenty good enough for most work. While more pixels would allow tighter cropping, going higher resolution would necessarily increase noise unless there's some big technological breakthrough.

I can see the 8K video guys enjoying the higher resolution though - noise isn't such an issue for them.
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
drmarkf (6th April 2019)
  #6  
Old 6th April 2019
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 5,567
Thanks: 354
Thanked 491 Times in 411 Posts
Likes: 2,171
Liked 1,259 Times in 720 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

Quote:
Originally Posted by Internaut View Post
Let’s see what kind of sensor Sharp come up with, and how much they’re prepared to sell it for. Like most of the other manufacturers, Olympus don’t make thier own sensors. A spectacular high res sensor, that Olympus can buy, is surely THE dream for any gear headed Olyphile?
Not for this one.

Those doing mainly landscape and studio imaging might want more resolution (and those that do actually print above, say, 12 x 16” might indeed see some resulting improvement...), but those of us shooting things that move in lowish light would happily stick at 20Mp but dream of another stop of signal to noise ratio.

It depends what you shoot. Currently, care in exposure and knowledgable processing is needed especially above ISO1600, and this corresponds to the beginning of the ISO range you need to use the 300 Pro in typical U.K. cloudy conditions and at the beginning and end of the day, while keeping the shutter speed high enough to freeze subject movement. Eg to get critically sharp feather detail in birds in flight you need 1/2000 at least. The latest FF bodies are notably better in this key area, as long as you can manage the cost and weight, while in any decent light the latest m4/3 sensors are perfectly OK.

ISO3200 is about the m4/3 sports and wildlife limit for anything beyond social media, while an extra stop would give improvement where it would really help.

However, I’m not holding my breath - the interwebs are still on a marketing-led Mp kick.
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
http://www.microcontrast.com
Too much Oly gear.
Panasonic 12-32, 12-35, 15. Laowa 7.5.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70 & a Sony A7S.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 6th April 2019
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,710
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,257 Times in 942 Posts
Likes: 150
Liked 5,995 Times in 1,953 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

Generally speaking, and contrary to many people's understanding, increasing Mp count does not lead to greater noise in the final image - in fact, evidence points in the opposite direction. Per pixel noise is not the important measure it's noise in the final image.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 6th April 2019
raichea raichea is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 677
Thanks: 87
Thanked 114 Times in 94 Posts
Likes: 103
Liked 115 Times in 78 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdk42 View Post
Generally speaking, and contrary to many people's understanding, increasing Mp count does not lead to greater noise in the final image - in fact, evidence points in the opposite direction. Per pixel noise is not the important measure it's noise in the final image.
At the individual pixel level, I think it's inarguable that noise increases as the size of the cell decreases - your comment suggests you support that, Paul.

Do you have a pointer to any corroborative information for noise in the final image?
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 6th April 2019
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,710
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,257 Times in 942 Posts
Likes: 150
Liked 5,995 Times in 1,953 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

Quote:
Originally Posted by raichea View Post
At the individual pixel level, I think it's inarguable that noise increases as the size of the cell decreases - your comment suggests you support that, Paul.

Do you have a pointer to any corroborative information for noise in the final image?
I think it's probably true that S/N deteriorates as pixel size decreases, all other things being equal. But other things are not equal since there will be complicating factors such as micro-lens efficiency, sensor technology (BSI etc), analogue electronics efficiency, software NR (even in raw files) and other things. It's hard to isolate just pixel count and keep all the others constant. What's generally true is that overall noise performance has improved over the years whilst pixel counts have generally increased too - so if you were to just measure noise performance against Mp count based on real world cameras then I think the curve would show more Mp = lower noise. For instance:

- a7Rii (42Mp) delivers lower noise than A7ii (24Mp)
- E-M5 (16Mp) delivers lower noise than E-P3 (12Mp)
- E-M1ii (20Mp) delivers lower noise than E-M1 (16Mp)

This article is interesting too. Look to the section entitled "Different Sized Pixels in the Same Sized Sensor":

http://www.clarkvision.com/articles/...l.size.matter/
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 6th April 2019
raichea raichea is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 677
Thanks: 87
Thanked 114 Times in 94 Posts
Likes: 103
Liked 115 Times in 78 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

Thanks - that looks interesting - I'll read it later.

I did add the caveat that technology improvements could mitigate the noise so I shall lean on that as a response to your counter-examples.
__________________
Steve
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 7th April 2019
Internaut Internaut is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,986
Thanks: 329
Thanked 314 Times in 293 Posts
Likes: 1,582
Liked 686 Times in 296 Posts
Re: A nice boost for u43 from Sharp

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdk42 View Post
Generally speaking, and contrary to many people's understanding, increasing Mp count does not lead to greater noise in the final image - in fact, evidence points in the opposite direction. Per pixel noise is not the important measure it's noise in the final image.
There are some very good threads on DPReview on this subject. Essentially, it seems more pixels will always mean better IQ but, I think, cramming more and more pixels into the same small area also gives diminishing returns.

Things will start to get rally interesting when global shutter becomes a reality. Imagine, for example, being able to expose for both highlight and shadow by having pixels alternating between two shutter speeds.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Live view boost & some video questions Macca1980 Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II 0 19th May 2017 07:34 AM
Live View Boost & the Histogram Gwyver Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II 4 24th January 2017 06:36 AM
Live Boost Cygnet Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II 6 4th July 2016 03:46 AM
My memory needs a boost! Homer Simpson Software 14 13th June 2011 07:25 AM
A small win, but a huge ego boost! Janet Foto Fair 13 20th September 2010 06:30 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:19 AM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger