Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Lens focus > Standard zoom and mid range

Standard zoom and mid range Lenses with focal lengths larger than 12mm, but no longer than 60mm, includes standard zooms and portrait primes plus some macro lenses.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14th May 2012
brianvickers's Avatar
brianvickers brianvickers is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,762
Thanks: 21
Thanked 230 Times in 221 Posts
Likes: 2
Liked 87 Times in 54 Posts
OM50mm v 45mm

Is the new mzuiko 45mm better in IQ than the OM50mm 1.8 with adaptor?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14th May 2012
snaarman's Avatar
snaarman snaarman is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baaarkshire UK
Posts: 6,867
Thanks: 502
Thanked 417 Times in 325 Posts
Likes: 492
Liked 1,341 Times in 507 Posts
Re: OM50mm v 45mm

Don't know if this helps, but the new 45mm f1.8 is very nearly as sharp as the remarkable 4/3 50mm macro, and that is saying something..

The 45 has a lovely smooth bokeh character. It focuses like lightning and is almost flawless optically.

Downsides: It doesn't do macro at all. It does show some longitudinal CA - stuff in front of focus has a slight green halo, stuff behind has a slight magenta halo. This can be eliminated by stopping down slightly.

In general it is fast, bright, light and sharp. My suspicions are that it would walk all over a nifty fifty from the film era because it was designed for the 4/3 sensor

Pete
__________________
Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 14th May 2012
brianvickers's Avatar
brianvickers brianvickers is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,762
Thanks: 21
Thanked 230 Times in 221 Posts
Likes: 2
Liked 87 Times in 54 Posts
Re: OM50mm v 45mm

sounds like its well worth the 229 from Park cameras then!
thanks
Brian
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 14th May 2012
snaarman's Avatar
snaarman snaarman is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baaarkshire UK
Posts: 6,867
Thanks: 502
Thanked 417 Times in 325 Posts
Likes: 492
Liked 1,341 Times in 507 Posts
Re: OM50mm v 45mm

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianvickers View Post
sounds like its well worth the 229 from Park cameras then!
thanks
Brian
Oh yes: It gets my thumbs up. The only improvements I would like are:

Make it slightly larger - so I feel like a proper photographer.
Make it in black please.

Oh, and the silly silver dress ring comes off too easily.
__________________
Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 14th May 2012
brianvickers's Avatar
brianvickers brianvickers is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,762
Thanks: 21
Thanked 230 Times in 221 Posts
Likes: 2
Liked 87 Times in 54 Posts
Re: OM50mm v 45mm

I'm finally selling my Canon gear...so turning it into some good primes, 12mm, 45mm and then wait for the 60 or 75. I already have the 20mm f1.7.
I have the 14-42, 12-50, 40-150 and a 50mm OM.
Think I have it covered then!
Would you suggest alternatives?
I'm tempted by the 75-300 - but would rarely make use of it -I think I can leave that till later.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 14th May 2012
snaarman's Avatar
snaarman snaarman is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baaarkshire UK
Posts: 6,867
Thanks: 502
Thanked 417 Times in 325 Posts
Likes: 492
Liked 1,341 Times in 507 Posts
Re: OM50mm v 45mm

A nice selection of bright primes is always a good plan. To avoid all the lens changing, you may need a second body

As to the 75-300: My experience with the 70-300 in 4/3 format is that 300 (or 600mm in old money) is one long lens. Assuming you have enough daylight or ISO and you can hold it steady (or the IS does that for you) then you still have all that atmospheric haze to deal with.

It all depends what you use it for I guess. I make myself stop at 150mm. If it's further away than that, then it's too far away

Pete


Quote:
Originally Posted by brianvickers View Post
I'm finally selling my Canon gear...so turning it into some good primes, 12mm, 45mm and then wait for the 60 or 75. I already have the 20mm f1.7.
I have the 14-42, 12-50, 40-150 and a 50mm OM.
Think I have it covered then!
Would you suggest alternatives?
I'm tempted by the 75-300 - but would rarely make use of it -I think I can leave that till later.
__________________
Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 14th May 2012
brianvickers's Avatar
brianvickers brianvickers is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,762
Thanks: 21
Thanked 230 Times in 221 Posts
Likes: 2
Liked 87 Times in 54 Posts
Re: OM50mm v 45mm

Yes I think the only benefit of long zooms is to get close up detail, anything at great distance always disappoints.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 14th May 2012
AdamThirtle's Avatar
AdamThirtle AdamThirtle is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Newcastle
Posts: 15
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: OM50mm v 45mm

I used to shoot a lot with the old OM 50mm 1.8, then purchased the 45mm.

I immediately noticed the IQ of the 45mm is significantly better than the 50mm. It's became my favourite prime.
__________________
www.adamthirtle.com
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 14th May 2012
brianvickers's Avatar
brianvickers brianvickers is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 1,762
Thanks: 21
Thanked 230 Times in 221 Posts
Likes: 2
Liked 87 Times in 54 Posts
Re: OM50mm v 45mm

Thanks Adam, thats good info as you have been able to compare the two directly.
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 17th May 2012
FlemmingS FlemmingS is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Copenhagen
Posts: 143
Thanks: 19
Thanked 11 Times in 10 Posts
Likes: 4
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: OM50mm v 45mm

Quote:
Originally Posted by brianvickers View Post
sounds like its well worth the 229 from Park cameras then!
thanks
Brian
The 45 mm is my favorite M43 lens and I wish I could use iton my E-30 instead of the 50 mm 1.4 with OM adapter
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
WANTED 45mm f1.8 for my pen inkyblue For sale or wanted small ads 0 1st April 2012 09:26 AM
For sale Panasonic 45mm 2.8 M43 Johnny Jetstream For sale or wanted small ads 0 30th November 2011 04:05 PM
45mm F1.8 DekHog E-group equipment hire 0 11th October 2011 10:01 PM
E-300 ZD 14-45mm set lichtloper For sale or wanted small ads 1 12th April 2010 07:19 PM
Another Purton Boat wrecks set... OM50mm lens images theMusicMan Foto Fair 16 14th March 2010 08:59 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:29 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger