Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Show your photos > Exhibitions, stock photos, professional work

Exhibitions, stock photos, professional work This board concentrates on topics that explore the potential of your photography being seen by a wider audience and even earning you some money.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 5th December 2015
Mdb2's Avatar
Mdb2 Mdb2 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 526
Thanks: 70
Thanked 61 Times in 52 Posts
Likes: 49
Liked 52 Times in 45 Posts
Wildlife photographer of the year

A short while ago I visited the national history museum to see for myself the best of the best. This is only my observations and not critisms. I could not find any Olympus exhibits and there were plenty of exhibits. It seemed all were by canon and Nikon users. I believe if memory serves me well there was one Fuji image. The images were very well presented and the charge of 6 was fair.
Any comments as to why none were from Olympus and the m4/3 contingent?
Kind regards mike
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 5th December 2015
benvendetta's Avatar
benvendetta benvendetta is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pontypool, South Wales
Posts: 3,750
Thanks: 83
Thanked 297 Times in 262 Posts
Likes: 167
Liked 340 Times in 230 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

It's not that m43rds kit is incapable. It is just that most serious wildlife photographers use Nikon and Canon.
__________________
Dave

E-M1 Mk2, Pen F, HLD-9, 17, 25, 45, 60 macro, 12-40 Pro, 40-150 Pro, 12-50, 40-150, 75-300, MC-14, MMF-3 (all micro 4/3rds), 7-14 (4/3rds), 50, 135 (OM), GoPro Hero 3, Novo/Giottos/ Manfrotto supports. Lowepro, Tamrac, Manfrotto, and Billingham bags.

External Competition Secretary, Cwmbran PS & Welsh Photographic Federation Judge
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 5th December 2015
Imageryone Imageryone is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Suffolk,England
Posts: 4,934
Thanks: 1,101
Thanked 797 Times in 755 Posts
Likes: 656
Liked 564 Times in 336 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

It is a lot to do with the Sponsors, which MIGHT involve those two ??
__________________
The picture tells the story, great when you have a bad memory.DW.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Minniesmum (8th January 2016)
  #4  
Old 5th December 2015
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A Brit now living in Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,624
Thanks: 39
Thanked 678 Times in 640 Posts
Likes: 254
Liked 1,345 Times in 802 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

Maybe because some Olympus users regard the competition as a joke and don't even bother checking out the winning shots these days. When some of the winning entries were taken at game farms or were set up the competition lost all credibility for me.
__________________
It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

David M's Photoblog
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Imageryone (5th December 2015), Minniesmum (8th January 2016), Ulfric M Douglas (13th December 2015)
  #5  
Old 5th December 2015
Wally's Avatar
Wally Wally is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Land of the Prince Bishops
Posts: 3,810
Thanks: 260
Thanked 1,140 Times in 714 Posts
Likes: 528
Liked 1,481 Times in 740 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

Have seen plenty of adverts on TV etc., for the dark side and Olympus being conspicuous by their absence. Same experience raises its ugly head when trying to get hands on experience before buying.

The quality is there, but access to the goods is not.
__________________
It's not what inspires us that is important, it's where the journey takes us.

Wally and his Collie with our Oly bits & bobs

Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Wee man (20th December 2015)
  #6  
Old 5th December 2015
Imageryone Imageryone is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Suffolk,England
Posts: 4,934
Thanks: 1,101
Thanked 797 Times in 755 Posts
Likes: 656
Liked 564 Times in 336 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally View Post
Have seen plenty of adverts on TV etc., for the dark side and Olympus being conspicuous by their absence. Same experience raises its ugly head when trying to get hands on experience before buying.

The quality is there, but access to the goods is not.
Same in a lot of magazines etc .
__________________
The picture tells the story, great when you have a bad memory.DW.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 5th December 2015
Mdb2's Avatar
Mdb2 Mdb2 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 526
Thanks: 70
Thanked 61 Times in 52 Posts
Likes: 49
Liked 52 Times in 45 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

Thanks for your comments,surely there must be macro and close up photographers that entered this competition.There were lots of commended and youth entries I wonder if the images on show were to a certain standard of
Resolution?
Kind regards Mike.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 5th December 2015
timboo timboo is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 951
Thanks: 86
Thanked 84 Times in 69 Posts
Likes: 82
Liked 148 Times in 90 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

In light of the post so far do some of these competitions have minimum requirments kit wise?
__________________
EM-1 MK1 - No website containing any of my photos until I'm good enough!
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 6th December 2015
Mdb2's Avatar
Mdb2 Mdb2 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 526
Thanks: 70
Thanked 61 Times in 52 Posts
Likes: 49
Liked 52 Times in 45 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally View Post
Have seen plenty of adverts on TV etc., for the dark side and Olympus being conspicuous by their absence. Same experience raises its ugly head when trying to get hands on experience before buying.

The quality is there, but access to the goods is not.
Hi Wally, I must admit I have noticed the same especially the latter part part of your input, I have jessops in my local town centre and in Reading Berks ( new store) quite alright if you want a new camera and maybe a lens but useless for accessories I've given up and try to get to Londons west end, combining it with a trip with the wife when she has booked a show with her sisters.
Kind regards mike
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 6th December 2015
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 5,647
Thanks: 360
Thanked 508 Times in 422 Posts
Likes: 2,219
Liked 1,281 Times in 728 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

Most wildlife photographers feel they want the kit that enables them to have the best chance of shooting birds in flight, plus it's only in the past year or two that many pros of any type have been going mirrorless. It's also only since production of the 40-150/1.4 combination that Oly have had a long lens that's good enough for a lot of wildlife.

Pros also want to stick with kit that has already proved reliable in their own hands and that they know: it's perfectly understandable that there is only slow change. Failure means you don't get paid. There have to be proven benefits before they'll take the risk.

If OMD CAF performance can genuinely be improved with next year's releases, and the 300 and 100-400 appear and are good, then a higher proportion will switch. Remember that Fuji are also now producing longer lenses and a t/c, and that some Sony bodies already have reasonable CAF with tracking (although not yet good long glass) so they may not choose Oly (although here Panasonic's video supremacy probably works in favour of m4/3 for people who shoot stills and video since you can have one of each body and maximise advantages while also having backup).

I've also recently been to the Landscape Photographer OTY show at Waterloo station: all were CaNikon bar (as I recall) one Sony, one Fuji, one ?Ricoh and one 10x8 plate camera with a Fujinon lens! Not surprising for landscape, perhaps.

Finally, earlier in the year I went to the Travel POTY at the Royal Geographical Soc. Penetration of mirrorless here was higher but still minimal - I forget the exact numbers, but it was something like 90% Canikon, 5% Sony, 3% Fuji and 2% bar (including only one Olympus E-M1).

I spoke to one of the judges at the TPOTY, himself a long-term Fuji mirrorless user, and he said a matching 90% of the submissions to the comp were still on DSLRs.

I don't accept that all these competitions can be influenced by the DSLR manufacturers sponsorship of the events: it's down to the pros and serious amateurs being understandably slow to switch. It will come, probably first in the TPOTY.
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
http://www.microcontrast.com
Too much Oly gear.
Panasonic GM5, 12-32, 12-35, 15. Laowa 7.5.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70 & a Sony A7S.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 6th December 2015
OM USer's Avatar
OM USer OM USer is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: London
Posts: 12,521
Thanks: 2,451
Thanked 1,547 Times in 1,471 Posts
Likes: 6,466
Liked 1,459 Times in 933 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wally View Post
Have seen plenty of adverts on TV etc., for the dark side and Olympus being conspicuous by their absence....
"Android Magazine" seems to alternate in each issue between a full page ad just inside the cover for Olympus OMD and one for Sony NEX. Just to prove the point though the last issue had one for some TV thing.
__________________
Cameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, M.ZD 40-150 F4-5.6 R, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
Learn something new every day
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 9th December 2015
timboo timboo is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 951
Thanks: 86
Thanked 84 Times in 69 Posts
Likes: 82
Liked 148 Times in 90 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

When you go to a football match most journalists have cameras on a tripod etc with the biggest lens known to man. Size doesnt matter neither does the bank balance to these people. so why would they go for M4/3 at present. Its not going to happen.
I suppose wildlife may fall into this catagory for twitchers. Just think its one explanation re the title of this thread and the lack of m4/3 entrants.
__________________
EM-1 MK1 - No website containing any of my photos until I'm good enough!
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 10th December 2015
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,673
Thanks: 427
Thanked 2,554 Times in 1,283 Posts
Likes: 885
Liked 1,766 Times in 797 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

With the fast improving selection of telephoto lenses appearing for Micro Four Thirds and the evidence that photographers we, here, are aware of being able to produce great wildlife images, it surely must only be a matter of time before photographers using Olympus and Panasonic Micro Four Thirds kit start to feature in this category.

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 10th December 2015
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 5,647
Thanks: 360
Thanked 508 Times in 422 Posts
Likes: 2,219
Liked 1,281 Times in 728 Posts
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

I agree, Ian.

At my camera club a reasonable number of good photographers have used Fuji crop-sensor mirrorless kit for some years, often combined with a DSLR setup for landscape or sports/wildlife, but overwhelmingly DSLRs have ruled.

In the last 12-18 months however there has been a massive change, with now most of the club committee plus several of the 'top' club members buying Olympus OMD kit. By 'top' I mean as measured by how often they place in club competitions.

Again these are being bought as supplements to existing Canikon gear, but several people have now sold their old kit.

Hardly a meeting goes by without someone coming up to me and asking about Olympus equipment, and I've lent several people various bits and pieces to try. I'm going to be asking Olympus for 10% on all consequent sales!

Of course this is a big club (nearly 200 members) and there are a lot of superb wildlife, sports and 'big' landscape photographers who perfectly reasonably are sticking with their big gear for now, but it will come.
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
http://www.microcontrast.com
Too much Oly gear.
Panasonic GM5, 12-32, 12-35, 15. Laowa 7.5.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70 & a Sony A7S.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 10th December 2015
Melaka's Avatar
Melaka Melaka is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Bucks
Posts: 2,452
Thanks: 773
Thanked 241 Times in 167 Posts
Likes: 756
Liked 365 Times in 153 Posts
Send a message via ICQ to Melaka
Re: Wildlife photographer of the year

Is part of the problem that we Oly owners don't bother to participate in these competitions? There are some stunning photos on this site, many of which are more than good enough to win. I get a trickle of photos published every year but the magazines never say they're taken with an Oly. Maybe we're guilty of hiding our lights under a bushel.
__________________
David

EM1ii, EM10ii
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The search for the next Wildlife Photographer of the Year begins Digital Photography Now General photography news from DPNow.com 0 2nd December 2013 07:10 PM
Wildlife late this year Wreckdiver The lounge 7 12th June 2013 10:30 PM
Veolia Environnement Wildlife Photographer of the Year Adagio The lounge 0 26th December 2011 04:39 PM
Wildlife Photographer of the Year Rawcoll The lounge 5 24th February 2010 07:19 PM
Wildlife Photographer of the Year 2008 NHM pasterw The lounge 2 10th November 2008 02:21 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:24 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger