Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Olympus E-5

Olympus E-5 E-5 specific discussion.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14th June 2013
47johnnyj 47johnnyj is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northfleet
Posts: 16
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Bigma

I'm looking for a lens for nature shots and was wondering if anyone has taken good pictures with the sigma 50-500, it seems a reasonable price for such a focal length, regards John
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 15th June 2013
Swordfish Swordfish is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Burton on the Wolds, Leics
Posts: 518
Thanks: 5
Thanked 74 Times in 52 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 19 Times in 8 Posts
Re: Bigma

I had a 'Bigma', which I used with an E620 and E5. It's not a bad lens at all - the attached photo was taken at 500mm on the E5, cropped slightly (by about 15%) and is pretty sharp.

The only downsides are what you would expect - it performs best in good light as f6.3 is obviously not very fast. Also auto focus can be a bit slow to lock onto what you want compared to SWD Zuiko lenses. But overall I think it gives good bang for buck.

The only reason I sold mine was that I was able to pick up a used 300mm f2.8 Oly lens.



Martin
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th June 2013
Chevvyf1's Avatar
Chevvyf1 Chevvyf1 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 12,269
Thanks: 1,744
Thanked 1,281 Times in 1,112 Posts
Likes: 1,169
Liked 522 Times in 392 Posts
Re: Bigma

Martin, THAT is EXCELLENT with BIGMA

For BIGMA images take a look at PeterD's Gallery on here or his website

http://www.imageinuk.com/ - all his Peregrine Falcons are BIGMA

For me, the BIGMA was too heavy and the 300 2.8

So now I am going to try the 90-250 BUT I do lurve my 50-200
__________________
.
.
[I].
.
I Lurve Walking in our Glorious Countryside; Photography;
Riding Ducati Motorbikes; Reading & Cooking ! ...


http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomagicf1_chevvy/sets/

the ONE photo album
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16th June 2013
crimbo crimbo is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shetland
Posts: 1,736
Thanks: 100
Thanked 149 Times in 130 Posts
Likes: 22
Liked 122 Times in 62 Posts
Re: Bigma

Heavy
these on an E620 hand held





100% crop




So if you cannot afford the 300mm f2.8, its a good option
__________________
chris
shetland
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 16th June 2013
andym's Avatar
andym andym is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Epping Forest
Posts: 4,355
Thanks: 37
Thanked 346 Times in 258 Posts
Likes: 39
Liked 1,010 Times in 300 Posts
Re: Bigma

Works well for me, as said it is heavy but can still be used handheld in good light.Not as heavy as the 300 f2.8 or 90-250.







Works really well with manual focus on the OM-D with the 5 axis stab.
__________________
All the best

Being left handed my brain sometimes works sdrawkcab

Andy

Lots of cameras and lenses.


My Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to andym For This Useful Post:
tomphotofx (16th June 2013)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
iso (2nd August 2017), RobEW (2nd April 2017)
  #6  
Old 16th June 2013
Falk's Avatar
Falk Falk is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Lower Saxony, GER
Posts: 1,107
Thanks: 236
Thanked 158 Times in 145 Posts
Likes: 90
Liked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Re: Bigma

Hi John,

you might want to go to the Gallery and use the Search function with 'Bigma'. You will get tons of photos coming up, which have been taken with it - and even some of mine

The Bigma is heavy, it is soft wide open, it is prone to CA's (chromatic aberrations; at least mine is), needs a bigger hood IMO (I use a 86mm screw on type) - but, it is the only lens I can afford, which gives me the reach I want/need.
Since I finally found one for a decent amount of cash, I have taken 90% of all my photos with it. I only own a E-30 and I know your E-5 will press definately more detail out of the Bigma. If you can find one, go for it!

Falk
__________________
I am not afraid of Tits
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Falk For This Useful Post:
tomphotofx (16th June 2013)
  #7  
Old 16th June 2013
Chevvyf1's Avatar
Chevvyf1 Chevvyf1 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Devon, UK
Posts: 12,269
Thanks: 1,744
Thanked 1,281 Times in 1,112 Posts
Likes: 1,169
Liked 522 Times in 392 Posts
Re: Bigma

Chris, Andy and Falk - I did not mean to offend re BIGMA owners/users - its just that I know PeterD - been out with him and he was first to come to mind
__________________
.
.
[I].
.
I Lurve Walking in our Glorious Countryside; Photography;
Riding Ducati Motorbikes; Reading & Cooking ! ...


http://www.flickr.com/photos/photomagicf1_chevvy/sets/

the ONE photo album
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 16th June 2013
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A Brit now living in Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,624
Thanks: 39
Thanked 678 Times in 640 Posts
Likes: 254
Liked 1,345 Times in 802 Posts
Re: Bigma

Given Sigmas reputation for sample variation and quality control maybe you could try a trick used by some Canon shooters.
Buy 3 copies of the lens, test them, keep the best and resell the other two.
__________________
It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

David M's Photoblog
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 16th June 2013
47johnnyj 47johnnyj is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Northfleet
Posts: 16
Thanks: 6
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Bigma

Hi there, thank you everyone who posted a reply for my 'Bigma' help post, really useful has certainly helped, regards John
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 16th June 2013
ringneck's Avatar
ringneck ringneck is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Birmingham
Posts: 2,862
Thanks: 59
Thanked 135 Times in 131 Posts
Likes: 159
Liked 48 Times in 32 Posts
Re: Bigma

Quote:
Originally Posted by David M View Post
Given Sigmas reputation for sample variation and quality control maybe you could try a trick used by some Canon shooters.
Buy 3 copies of the lens, test them, keep the best and resell the other two.
Ouch.......

I loved the one I had for a short time and got some good pics.....all the shortcomings have already been listed and I only giot rid when I moved on to Canon for my long range/wildlife pics.

Love all the Siggy Bigma shots.....
Keith



King with Fish by noisybugger, on Flickr
__________________
Keith


http://www.flickr.com/photos/68459774@N05

E500,E510 now dead,E520 (now retired),E600 and Grip,14-42,14-45,2x40-150,Sigmas 105 and 135-400 Now Dead..ex 25. Manfrotto 190. Plus lots of OM stuff.
Now also 4 items from the dark side...........
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 2nd April 2017
David Brown David Brown is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Bigma

I haven't used the Bigma with the E-5, yet, as I only got that body (used) this week. I have used it with a monopod and an E-3, to take such low light images as this:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/chiche...posted-public/
Yes, very noisy (I had typed "grainy", which shows my age!), but it was shot at 3200 ISO.

I am very impressed with the wildlife shots above.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 2nd August 2017
Hemlockwood Hemlockwood is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: XXXXXXXXX
Posts: 1,120
Thanks: 269
Thanked 35 Times in 34 Posts
Likes: 1,242
Liked 8 Times in 8 Posts
Re: Bigma

I am aware this is a very old thread and the Bigma may be completely out of favour now but I was wondering if anyone has used it with the EM1 Mark ii. I note the negative aspects of the lens but would be helpful to know if anyone is having any success with the new technology.
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 2nd August 2017
David Brown David Brown is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Bigma

I forgot to post this, but I have now used the Bigma with the E-5, and was not wildly impressed:
https://www.flickr.com/photos/102701...posted-public/
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to David Brown For This Useful Post:
Hemlockwood (2nd August 2017)
  #14  
Old 2nd August 2017
Mdb2's Avatar
Mdb2 Mdb2 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 526
Thanks: 70
Thanked 61 Times in 52 Posts
Likes: 49
Liked 52 Times in 45 Posts
Re: Bigma

Try the sigma 500f4.5 which is super sharp via a metabones no zoom it's a prime. Don't know if that's to expensive for you. I have also used the siggy150-500 f6.3 Canon version. Which is lighter? using the zoom lenses it helps if you wind it in a bit to 480ish and use f7.1? I have used them both with my em1 and em1 mk2 via the metabones you will still have 950mm walkabout lens. I only recently stopped using them both because I purchased the OLY 300f4. I hope this helps?
Kind regards Mike
__________________
http://www.wingsofnature.org
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mdb2 For This Useful Post:
Hemlockwood (2nd August 2017)
  #15  
Old 2nd August 2017
David Brown David Brown is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: West Sussex
Posts: 9
Thanks: 0
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Bigma

Quote:
Originally Posted by Mdb2 View Post
Try the sigma 500f4.5 which is super sharp via a metabones no zoom it's a prime. Don't know if that's to expensive for you. I have also used the siggy150-500 f6.3 Canon version. Which is lighter? using the zoom lenses it helps if you wind it in a bit to 480ish and use f7.1? I have used them both with my em1 and em1 mk2 via the metabones you will still have 950mm walkabout lens. I only recently stopped using them both because I purchased the OLY 300f4. I hope this helps?
Kind regards Mike
Q. What is the right number of lenses to own?
A. Either, a. One more than you already have, or, b. One fewer than will result in divorce.
I think if I announced that I'd bought a lens costing 1,648.45, second hand, and that it was going to need an adapter that doesn't seem to be available used or new (the Metabones website only mentions Micro Four Thirds adapters, now), I'd be contravening answer b!
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Johnheatingman (2nd August 2017)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Bigma 50-500 ozzie Telephoto 38 15th May 2018 12:54 PM
For sale Bigma The Saint For sale or wanted small ads 12 6th December 2012 09:53 PM
Still trying with the Bigma ozzie Foto Fair 5 22nd July 2011 08:05 AM
Bigma Help ozzie Looking for improvement 4 11th May 2011 08:18 AM
FS: Bigma Stephen_M For sale or wanted small ads 10 4th August 2010 07:02 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:49 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger