Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Lens focus

Lens focus The place to talk about your camera's glassware.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 14th March 2009
dkayuk dkayuk is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Guildford, UK
Posts: 107
Thanks: 3
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 2 Posts
Question If I have the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro lens, is the Olympus 35mm macro redundant?

Hi all

I guess the title says it all. Got the Sigma yesterday and took my first shots today. AF seems a bit erratic but I use MF most of the time, so not a serious problem. I like the quality of the shots. They were shot handheld this afternoon (cloudy sky).

I wanted to extra working distance provided by the 105mm lens so that's why I bought it.

Aside from the shorter focus distance which is not really of interest to me, is there any other reason for keeping (as in,not selling..) the 35mm macro ZD lens? Would I be losing out on anything?

Here are two shots taken with very little effort & handheld (with the Sigma) this afternoon at the London Wetlands Trust in Barnes (SW13). Maybe not perfect, but I like them

My camera is the E-520.

thx

DK



Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 14th March 2009
Garrie's Avatar
Garrie Garrie is offline
SonorG
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Scotland
Posts: 1,003
Thanks: 65
Thanked 12 Times in 11 Posts
Likes: 2
Liked 7 Times in 3 Posts
Re: If I have the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro lens, is the Olympus 35mm macro redundant?

Great shots however I think they look alittle soft only imho though.. The bokeh is very pleasing for me

I'd keep the Zuiko 35macro aswell. Great little lens
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 15th March 2009
tlove
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: If I have the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro lens, is the Olympus 35mm macro redundant?

Lovely shots !

As Garrie says, they are just a little soft, but don't despair.

I've got the Sigma 150mm macro, and get the same sort of shots as above handheld. A fellow Olympus user (who uses same lenses) told me to always use either a monopod or tripod when using these Sigma lenses. I hate tripods but have a monopod, so I tried that and the results were much sharper.

Keep an eye on the focusing issue though - if it's a new lens, don't take any nonsense if it won't focus properly, it should be sent back (I should know).

As to the 35mm macro - I've got the 50mm macro and have no intention of getting rid of mine. It's a fantastic bit of glass. The Sigma is great for taking shots of butterflies, dragonflies etc. that would move off if you came any where near them, but the 35mm can't be beaten for flowers, bugs etc. that don't run\fly off if you so much as breathe! Image quality wise, the Olympus glass can't be beaten either.

What I'm trying to say in my usual clumsy way is 'horses for courses'. Only you can decide if you should move your 35mm out in favour of the Sigma, but I wouldn't jump to a quick decision you may later regret .
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 15th March 2009
PeterD PeterD is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,248
Thanks: 44
Thanked 88 Times in 73 Posts
Likes: 14
Liked 37 Times in 12 Posts
Re: If I have the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro lens, is the Olympus 35mm macro redundant?

Dk not bad shots for the new lens. I agree with all the comments. For Macro work IMHO you need to steady the camera on a tripod/monopod to get the very best results from the lens.

Quote:
Originally Posted by tlove View Post
Keep an eye on the focusing issue though - if it's a new lens, don't take any nonsense if it won't focus properly, it should be sent back (I should know).
Thea

Did you manage to get the Bigma sorted in the end? Sounds like you have.

Peter
__________________
Best Regards

PeterD

www.imageinuk.com/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 15th March 2009
tlove
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: If I have the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro lens, is the Olympus 35mm macro redundant?

Quote:
Originally Posted by PeterD View Post

Did you manage to get the Bigma sorted in the end? Sounds like you have.

Peter
Still with them Peter - 3 weeks and counting . Could have done with it today though - typical! Just as well I've got the 50-200 and 1.4 TC We're going to give them a nudge this week and see what they say - they must have been able to diagnose it by now .
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 15th March 2009
PeterD PeterD is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Portsmouth
Posts: 2,248
Thanks: 44
Thanked 88 Times in 73 Posts
Likes: 14
Liked 37 Times in 12 Posts
Re: If I have the Sigma 105mm f2.8 macro lens, is the Olympus 35mm macro redundant?

Thea
I have my fingers crossed for you.
Peter
__________________
Best Regards

PeterD

www.imageinuk.com/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Mint E-410, 14-42, 40-150, 35mm Macro smashingthewindow For sale or wanted small ads 0 2nd February 2009 12:53 PM
35mm Macro or Sigma 135-400 Nick Temple-Fry Foto Fair 9 28th September 2008 12:30 PM
FS Sigma 105mm macro (4/3rds fit) Who's_E For sale or wanted small ads 2 6th July 2008 06:47 AM
Olympus 35mm macro or Sigma 24mm? OwainB Standard zoom and mid range 9 10th March 2008 09:04 PM
Macro Photography - E-510 with 35mm F3.5 Macro Lens Ray Shotter Foto Fair 13 23rd February 2008 11:43 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:48 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger