Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Lens focus > Wide angle

Wide angle Lenses with focal lengths shorter than 14mm.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 10th May 2011
francois's Avatar
francois francois is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northampton
Posts: 538
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
from 9 to 60

Supposing you have a 12-60, is there any value in getting a 11-22 considering the overlap? I can see the point in having a 9-18 to complement the 12-60 but not the 11-22.

Am I missing anything here?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 10th May 2011
StephenL's Avatar
StephenL StephenL is offline
Senior Pixelmonger
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 984
Thanked 1,126 Times in 921 Posts
Likes: 658
Liked 755 Times in 499 Posts
Re: from 9 to 60

I would say not. I own the 11-22, and have owned the 12-60 and the 9-18 (plus the 7-14). Of all these wide-angle zooms, I would rank the 7-14 as most useful, the 9-18 as a good all-rounder (though not weather resistant) and the 11-22 as least useful. I only keep it (the 11-22) so that I have a wide-angle option on my E-1 kit - the remaining lenses being the superb 14-54 Mk2, and the excellent 40-150 Mk1.
__________________
Stephen

A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

My Flickr site

Last edited by StephenL; 10th May 2011 at 10:29 AM. Reason: clarification
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 10th May 2011
Tordan58's Avatar
Tordan58 Tordan58 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 3,285
Thanks: 299
Thanked 409 Times in 337 Posts
Likes: 408
Liked 1,423 Times in 366 Posts
Re: from 9 to 60

I agree.
The 7-14 range would fit very well with the 12-60.
The 11-22 is almost overlapping the 12-60. Max angle difference is 89 vs 84, 5 degrees only.
The 9-18 has some overlap but the max angle (100 degrees vs 84) makes a difference. It is however not a high grade lens, it is not a fast lens but it performs well and most users seem satisfied with it.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 10th May 2011
francois's Avatar
francois francois is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Northampton
Posts: 538
Thanks: 1
Thanked 28 Times in 22 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: from 9 to 60

Thanks, that confirms what I had in mind.

Mind you, the 7-14 is nearly 3 times the cost of the 9-18, so the latter will probably suffice for my modest talent.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10th May 2011
StephenL's Avatar
StephenL StephenL is offline
Senior Pixelmonger
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 984
Thanked 1,126 Times in 921 Posts
Likes: 658
Liked 755 Times in 499 Posts
Re: from 9 to 60

3 times the cost, but in my view 10 times the lens! And that goes for the m4/3 versions as well.

Quote:
Originally Posted by francois View Post
the 7-14 is nearly 3 times the cost of the 9-18,
__________________
Stephen

A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

My Flickr site
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10th May 2011
theMusicMan's Avatar
theMusicMan theMusicMan is offline
E-3 Enthusiast....:)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Wales
Posts: 5,878
Thanks: 143
Thanked 267 Times in 178 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Re: from 9 to 60

What you need to remember is the higher the increase in focal length of nearby lenses, the less increase in magnification, but the lower the length of the focal range of nearby lenses, the greater the field of view.

So... if you compare the Oly 70-300mm and the Sigma 135-400mm. The main difference at the high end is an additional 100mm from 300 to 400mm. For those looking for greater reach, this additional 100mm will yield only an additional x.33 (33%) magnification, and won't massively increase what you see through your viewfinder. As a general rule, what you see through the viewfinder at 300mm will be reduced by a third.

However, if you compare the 12-60mm and the 7-14 at the wide end of their ranges... you will see a significant difference through the viewfinder. 7mm is nearly half as much as 12mm, and so you will essentially see twice the field of view with the 7mm than with the 12mm i.e. approx 90% wider. This difference is significant in wide angle lenses more-so than it is in telephoto lenses.

Not very well explained, but hopefully enough to make you think.
__________________
John

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10th May 2011
Tordan58's Avatar
Tordan58 Tordan58 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Malmö, Sweden
Posts: 3,285
Thanks: 299
Thanked 409 Times in 337 Posts
Likes: 408
Liked 1,423 Times in 366 Posts
Re: from 9 to 60

Hi,

I am inclined to disagree with the previous post. The relationship between focal length and angle of view is not a linear one.

For telephoto lenses we could approximate double focal length to half angular view, but this is not true for short focal lengths.

Attached is a chart showing focal length (4/3 system) on X-axis and angle of view on Y-axis. I simply plotted data obtained from specification from the available Olympus lens specifications. (Note that the odd values e.g. 420, 280 etc come from combining the EC14 and EC20 with various telephoto lenses, partly off topic.)





Focal length Angle of view
600 2,1
420 3
300 4,2
280 4,5
250 5
200 6,2
180 6,9
150 8,2
100 12
90 14
70 18
60 20
54 23
50 24
40 30
35 34
22 53
18 62
17 65
14 75
12 84
11 89
9 100
7 114
Attached Images
File Type: jpg Focal Length vs Angle of View.JPG (24.9 KB, 4 views)
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10th May 2011
theMusicMan's Avatar
theMusicMan theMusicMan is offline
E-3 Enthusiast....:)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Wales
Posts: 5,878
Thanks: 143
Thanked 267 Times in 178 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Re: from 9 to 60

OK, I was not talking using accurate analytical figures as you are doing here, but... if I use your figures to illustrate what I mean...

300mm to 400mm provides a reduction in field of view of 1.2 degrees

12mm to 7 mm provides an increase in field of view of 30 degrees
__________________
John

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:23 PM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger