Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > General photography discussion

General photography discussion Please look for a specific board to start your thread but if you can't find an appropriate one, post it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2nd July 2019
RobEW RobEW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,045
Thanks: 165
Thanked 74 Times in 68 Posts
Likes: 1,195
Liked 194 Times in 132 Posts
OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

I read elsewhere, contentiously:

"An OMD with the 12-100 lens is effectively an over-priced bridge camera".


As they say in exam papers, "discuss". :-)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 2nd July 2019
RobEW RobEW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,045
Thanks: 165
Thanked 74 Times in 68 Posts
Likes: 1,195
Liked 194 Times in 132 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

My response was "more highly priced and also more highly specified than a bridge camera".

But it's an interesting point, given that some people say how rarely they switch to another lens.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd July 2019
Walti Walti is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 3,442
Thanks: 332
Thanked 225 Times in 192 Posts
Likes: 241
Liked 1,743 Times in 647 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

I can agree with the sentiment, but that's true of a high proportion of interchangeable lens cameras, including 35mm frame size DSLRs, where people buy it and never change the lens.
__________________

Some Olympus stuff
I didn't get where I am today...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
RobEW (4th July 2019)
  #4  
Old 2nd July 2019
Zuiko's Avatar
Zuiko Zuiko is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunmow, Essex
Posts: 22,130
Thanks: 1,987
Thanked 3,164 Times in 2,472 Posts
Likes: 3,420
Liked 4,473 Times in 2,124 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

How is it different than, say, a Tamron 16-300mm superzoom on a full frame DSLR?

Oh, of course - it has a larger maximum aperture, constant throughout the zoom range and indisputably better image quality that puts the Olympus combination into a different league. Obviously it is relatively big and heavy, but that's why we have the option of the 12-40mm.
__________________
John

"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there — even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
RobEW (4th July 2019)
  #5  
Old 2nd July 2019
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,710
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,257 Times in 942 Posts
Likes: 150
Liked 6,006 Times in 1,955 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

For some types of photography that's probably a fair statement. But the same could be said of a really expensive camera like the Leica SL + 24-90 (a cool £7k at most retailers). So what?

But as Graham's thread on this article pointed out, in favourable conditions almost any quality camera will deliver results that no-one can distinguish apart. The more important question to ask is "what's the shooting envelope of the camera system as a whole"? Clearly the OMD + 12-100 (and other lenses) delivers MUCH more than a bridge camera (lenses, features, AF, speed, IQ in poorer light, ...).
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
RobEW (4th July 2019)
  #6  
Old 2nd July 2019
MikeOxon MikeOxon is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: oxford
Posts: 582
Thanks: 60
Thanked 103 Times in 89 Posts
Likes: 61
Liked 233 Times in 147 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

The last 'bridge' camera I used was a Lumix FZ200 and I realise that more recent models have larger sensors but are bigger and heavier.

My main problem was that, although it was very convenient having such a wide-range lens always available, this was seriously offset by slowness of operation. I'd have had time to change lenses in the time it took for the camera to start up, slowly wind out the zoom, and find focus. I missed so many shots that I gave up on 'bridges'.

I suspect an OMD with 12-100 has a much better 'hit rate' and, for me, that's well worth the price
__________________
Mike
visit my Natural History Photos website:
http://home.btconnect.com/mike.flemming/
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
RobEW (4th July 2019)
  #7  
Old 2nd July 2019
Graham_of_Rainham's Avatar
Graham_of_Rainham Graham_of_Rainham is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rainham
Posts: 8,131
Thanks: 644
Thanked 940 Times in 728 Posts
Likes: 2,276
Liked 1,581 Times in 911 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

For many years zoom lens designs limited the range to less than 3 for the optimal image quality. The 14-35 f/2.0 35-100 f/2.0 90-250 f/2.8 were acknowledged by almost everyone as being about as good as it gets.

By the time mft was developed, lens design had moved on to provide slightly more range and the 12-40 f/2.8 40-150 f/2.8 were the top performers with the 7-14 f/2.8 maintaining its 2x ratio, but within a faster optic.

The move to f/4.0 lens design provides for significant opportunities for increasing the zoom range, while maintaining image quality. However it is still design optimisations that have limited the range to about the 5 times, which the old FT 12-60 was a super example.

Personally I have found myself using the Panasonic 14-140 ii on a GX8 for my walk about kit and the dual IS produces surprisingly good quality images, unless you study them corner to corner...

Ultimately it is always going to be personal choice and acceptance of the compromise for convenience. When I work in a studio or on location then it’s straight back to prime lenses, which I only have to carry short distance.

Given some “bridge cameras” are offering 40x zooms, plus macro, pop-up flash, I consider there is enough difference and a better IQ to not see the 12-100 in this category.

__________________
Graham

We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy...
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
RobEW (4th July 2019), Zuiko (2nd July 2019)
  #8  
Old 3rd July 2019
AMc AMc is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: East Anglia
Posts: 1,729
Thanks: 114
Thanked 175 Times in 158 Posts
Likes: 909
Liked 443 Times in 218 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

I suspect anyone that buys an interchangeable lens camera and never changes lenses is better off with a fixed lens option but people make their own choices.

I'd argue that anyone buying a 4x4 who never tows or goes off road would be better with an estate or saloon but you pay your money, you take your choice.



Olympus have recently started selling the OM-D E-M10iii with the 12-200 zoom as a kit.
https://shop.olympus.eu/en_GB/camera...i-12-200mm-kit

At a grand it's a chunk of money and I can't see the appeal personally but that covers a lot of ground.
I would hope that the 4/3rds sensor would put it a step above most bridges even at that price point but I wouldn't know for sure.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
RobEW (4th July 2019)
  #9  
Old 3rd July 2019
Petrochemist Petrochemist is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: N Essex
Posts: 737
Thanks: 36
Thanked 83 Times in 76 Posts
Likes: 217
Liked 129 Times in 94 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

The huge zoom range of the 12-100 means it can be used in a similar way to bridge cameras. It will give better results than most (if not all) of them used in this way.


To me though the big difference is the lens CAN be changed if circumstances require it such as for low light shots, or to try a fisheye...
__________________
Mike
Compulsive photographic Dabbler.
Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
jonesy (8th July 2019), NickLeon (13th July 2019), RobEW (4th July 2019)
  #10  
Old 3rd July 2019
OM USer's Avatar
OM USer OM USer is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: London
Posts: 12,205
Thanks: 2,396
Thanked 1,509 Times in 1,437 Posts
Likes: 6,261
Liked 1,433 Times in 914 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Petrochemist View Post
...To me though the big difference is the lens CAN be changed if circumstances require it such as for low light shots, or to try a fisheye...
Exactly. There are times when you want the best lens for the photo opportunity in front of you and will switch to that lens and there are times when you DON'T want to change lenses (personal and equipment security, time, framing options, etc) when the 12-100 or may I suggest the 12-200 are the best tools for the job.
__________________
Cameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, M.ZD 40-150 F4-5.6 R, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
Learn something new every day
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
RobEW (4th July 2019)
  #11  
Old 4th July 2019
RobEW RobEW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 2,045
Thanks: 165
Thanked 74 Times in 68 Posts
Likes: 1,195
Liked 194 Times in 132 Posts
Re: OMD + 12-100 an overpriced bridge camera?

Great points.

As far as I'm aware the biggest sensor on a bridge camera is 1 inch / 20MPixel, and 4/3rds is over 75% larger (though still 20 MPixel). I'm guessing this is also significant.


Personally even though I use the 12-100 a lot, I'm glad I have the option of switching to the 60mm macro, the Sigma 30/1.4, the Four thirds 50-200 and various other options.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
For sale Panasonic FZ330 bridge camera, as new. baldyb For sale or wanted small ads 0 8th September 2018 06:30 PM
Are Olympus Accessories overpriced paulw Accessory talk 20 7th February 2018 05:00 PM
What 'bridge' camera for portraits jdal The lounge 15 11th August 2016 08:56 AM
Bridge-to-Bridge (lots of images) IainMacD Foto Fair 8 28th April 2014 12:36 PM
Can't think of the name of this bridge... corned Foto Fair 11 17th September 2013 04:34 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:17 AM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger