Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Lens focus

Lens focus The place to talk about your camera's glassware.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th April 2010
Radar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Does glass quality/size matter?

Tried to search around to find an answer but turns to this excellent forum for answer :

I have been around taking photos with friends and people I've met that uses either a Nikon DX-camera or a fullformat camera. I have tried to replicate their settings with my camera (Shutter, ISO and f-stop) and can't get the same lightness in the camera. As an example we were taking photos of horses and he used 1/640sec, f8 and ISO400 but his pictures were much lighter than mine that ended up far to the left on the scale.

Someone mentioned that the cameras with larger sensors are able to replicate light better than cameras with smaller sensors. Is this right?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18th April 2010
StephenL's Avatar
StephenL StephenL is offline
Senior Pixelmonger
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 984
Thanked 1,126 Times in 921 Posts
Likes: 658
Liked 755 Times in 499 Posts
Re: Does glass quality/size matter?

Were you both taking Raw images or Jpegs? If Jpegs, the difference is probably in the way each camera configures these. If Raw, make sure that both images are converted using the same parameters. Even this is not guaranteed to prove any point, as the way Raw images from different manufacturers are rendered may be different.
__________________
Stephen

A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

My Flickr site
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18th April 2010
Barrie Norman's Avatar
Barrie Norman Barrie Norman is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Cambridgeshire
Posts: 543
Thanks: 2
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Does glass quality/size matter?

Why try to duplicate their settings, I you had set your camera on "A" with f8 and ISO400 the pictures would have come out OK but using full manual is forcing the camera. Olympus cameras with Oly glass will out perform Nikon under normal circumstances the 12.3 mega pixel sensor has more pixels per Sq mm than the full frame Nikon DX so stop trying to duplicate your friends settings and allow the camera some control.
__________________
Barrie Norman

http://bwpn.zenfolio.com/

http://naturalhistorycambs.blogspot.com/

Digital Equipment: Olympus E1 - E30 - E-500 | EC-14 & EC-20 Teleconverter | Zukio 14-45mm, 40-150mm, 150mm F/2, 50-200mm SWD, 70-300mm | Sigma 10-20mm F/4-5.6 SLD, 18-50 f/2.8 EX DC MACRO, 150 F2.8 Macro & 50-500mm (Bigma) |Tamron 135mm f/2.5 Macro 200mm f/3.5 | Optecka 800mm f/8 Prime | Wallimax 500mm F/6.3 Mirror Lens | Metz Mecablitz 36 AF-4 O Digital Flash | Manfrotto 055XB Tripod, Opticron Carbon Fibre "Traveller" Tripod, Sidewinder Gimbal Head, Manfratto 676B monopod, Manfrotto 322RC2 Head Lowpro Nature Trekker AWII, Lowpro Vertex 100 AW and Lowpro Toploader Pro 75 AW.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th April 2010
Radar
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Does glass quality/size matter?

Photos were taken in RAW and processed in ACR. No changes made to exposure etc. The reason for duplicating the settings were because we started taking about light sensitivity etc. So we had a few exposures to do the test.

However; after the photos were done after the horse photo-session I was booked to to all the photos for a yard (5-6 horses) on 16th of May in a competition. This might be the perfect opportunity to buy/rent a better lens.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18th April 2010
snaarman's Avatar
snaarman snaarman is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baaarkshire UK
Posts: 6,865
Thanks: 502
Thanked 417 Times in 325 Posts
Likes: 492
Liked 1,338 Times in 506 Posts
Re: Does glass quality/size matter?

Camera manufacturers come up with ISO settings to match the sensor and metering to customers expectation. Clearly there is no film/developer and negative densitometry involved with digital ISO - so it is a bit of trial and error..

Reviews quite often show that a camera's quoted ISO is wrong, so I guess its a little bit like "how long is a piece of string" In an ideal world every DSLR should produce similar images when set to the same ISO with comparable lenses, but it looks like they don't..

Pete
__________________
Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 19th April 2010
HughofBardfield's Avatar
HughofBardfield HughofBardfield is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Great Bardfield, Essex, UK
Posts: 730
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Does glass quality/size matter?

Some of us went on a tutored studio session a while back and found that our results from a given aperture/shutter setting were significantly different to the guy leading the session, who was shooting Nikon (don't remember the model, but I'm certain it wasn't full frame). I seem to remember it was about a stop different. Similar reasons, I guess. As Pete says, there seems no universal standard for digital ISO as there was for film, and I suspect the selection of exactly what constitutes a camera's ISO100 or 200 point (or whatever the "native" sensitivity of the sensor is) is partially a marketing, as well as a technical, decision.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 19th April 2010
Graham_of_Rainham's Avatar
Graham_of_Rainham Graham_of_Rainham is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rainham
Posts: 8,185
Thanks: 647
Thanked 945 Times in 733 Posts
Likes: 2,298
Liked 1,602 Times in 925 Posts
Re: Does glass quality/size matter?

Quote:
Originally Posted by HughofBardfield View Post
Some of us went on a tutored studio session a while back and found that our metered settings were significantly different to the guy leading the session, who was shooting Nikon. Similar reasons, I guess.
I remember that

Because of this I bought a meter and worked out for myself, much more about the way my E-3 meters with the various modes, etc..

http://www.sekonic.com/classroom/classroom_2.asp
__________________
Graham

We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy...
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 19th April 2010
HughofBardfield's Avatar
HughofBardfield HughofBardfield is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Great Bardfield, Essex, UK
Posts: 730
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Does glass quality/size matter?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham_of_Rainham View Post
I remember that

Because of this I bought a meter and worked out for myself, much more about the way my E-3 meters with the various modes, etc..

http://www.sekonic.com/classroom/classroom_2.asp
Yes - I've used a flash meter with my own cheap and cheerful studio lights and found that the meter reading is a starting point rather than giving "perfect" exposure (whatever that is). Using legacy lenses also requires a more creative approach as the given reading is often inaccurate (especially in matrix mode - which I now tend not to use with legacy glass).
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 21st April 2010
photo_owl photo_owl is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Kent
Posts: 1,423
Thanks: 37
Thanked 129 Times in 113 Posts
Likes: 55
Liked 53 Times in 42 Posts
Re: Does glass quality/size matter?

as Pete and Hugh have outlined, there is no fundamental reason for differences based on lenses or sensor sizes etc

there may be a difference in the actual sensitivity of the sensor in the same way as films have a particular sensitivity; however in my experience this happens less than some discussions suggest.

comparisons are notoriously difficult to make accurately because either the camera jpeg engine is rendering the output (here gradation settings can have a huge impact) or the raw convertor is off applying it's thoughts on the correct output - better but there are still potential issues.
__________________
E, Pen and OM-D bodies
43 m43 and legacy glass
loads of flashes and accessories from all the systems
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is it a matter of more money than sense JackBenedict The lounge 18 15th April 2010 06:44 PM
Does Size matter.....? Jon*E Lens focus 0 20th February 2010 02:00 PM
JPEG/File Size/Image Size/Image Quality jdal Software 7 23rd August 2009 01:51 PM
The size of the E-P1 benvendetta Micro Four Thirds 5 4th July 2009 10:33 PM
Glass Bottle Glass Graham_of_Rainham Looking for improvement 9 3rd September 2008 10:25 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:46 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger