Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Lens focus > Standard zoom and mid range

Standard zoom and mid range Lenses with focal lengths larger than 12mm, but no longer than 60mm, includes standard zooms and portrait primes plus some macro lenses.

 
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
  #1  
Old 12th November 2007
OwainB
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Olympus 35mm macro or Sigma 24mm?

Hi. First of all, I'd like to say how pleased I am to see a dedicated E-System forum!

Right - now to the dilemma. As a newbie to the DSLR world (recently upgraded from a digital compact), I could do with some advice.

I'm wondering whether to go for the Olympus 35mm f3.5 macro or the Sigma 24mm f1.8 EX DG aspherical macro (at least that's what they call it - I thought 0.37x magnification made it not a macro?) to whack on my E-410. It's largely because I love taking pictures up close, and it might be useful for product photography (I sell jewellery among other small things), but also because I like the idea of a fixed length lens - better optical quality, and learning to compose the shot by thinking and moving rather than lazy zooming.

Looking at (what I perceive to be) the pros and cons of each:

Olympus
Pros: Cheap, small and light
Cons: Only f3.5, 35mm maybe a little long?

Sigma
Pros: Big aperture, focal length similar to "standard" lens (50mm lens on 35mm camera)
Cons: About twice the price of the Olympus, almost twice the size and three times the weight!

I'm very tempted to just go for the Olympus, but the cons I listed above do concern me slightly. I do quite a lot of general shooting in low light levels (I live in Northumberland - it's the norm here!), and I think I might really appreciate the extra couple of stops the Sigma would give me. I also love a shallow DOF, and the f1.8 would give me that in spades.

I don't know if I'm putting too much emphasis on the whole "standard" lens thing, but I've heard from a few sources that using a 50mm-equivalent fixed lens is a great way to learn more about composition and technique, as the lens sees a roughly equivalent field of view to the human eye. Any views on this?

Anyway, if anyone has experience of either of these lenses - or even better, both! - and has any pointers either way, your views would be greatly appreciated. In fact, in the unlikely situation that anyone has both lenses and could post some pictures of the same subject shot with both lenses, that would probably help me settle this once and for all!

Sorry to ramble on in my first post!

Thanks.

Owain
Reply With Quote
 

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:41 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger