Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Olympus E-3

Olympus E-3 E-3 specific discussion.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 18th February 2008
Nick Temple-Fry's Avatar
Nick Temple-Fry Nick Temple-Fry is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 4,395
Thanks: 17
Thanked 190 Times in 142 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
E3 - Picture Count

With a Sandisk Ultra II 4Gb CF card my E-3 (updated to current firmware) shows a capacity of 236 pictures when shooting RAW. Today I pulled 355 RAW files off it and it still claimed to have room for 16 more.

Now I'm happy that it is a bit pessimistic in its expectations, but this seems unnecessarily extreme.

Is this a general experience, or just a feature of my camera/card combination. I admit that I have not formatted this card in this camera (it was formatted in the e-500) but?

Nick
__________________
Nick Temple-Fry

Medicine as a science ranks somewhere between archaeology and economics.

www.theChurchPhotographer.co.uk 90 Churches -- Fairford St Mary's, exceptionally splendid
www.temple-fry.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 18th February 2008
ukanalyst
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: E3 - Picture Count

My Sandisk Extreme III and Extreme IV 4GB cards both show capacity @ 236 RAW shots IIRC even when formatted in my E3 although I haven't tested this out yet ... does seem odd the camera will allow so many more shots to be taken on it. What happens when you reach 0 ... does it stay there and allow you to keep on shooting or go into minus figures or does it re-calculate capacity before that?

Dave

Edit: Been looking at Wrotniak's technical review (http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/oly-e/e3-rev.html) and he has this to say:

Quote:
Starting from the E-410/E-510, ORF (Olympus Raw Format) files are compressed using a lossless compression scheme. This allows for smaller raw file sizes. The manual says ORF files are, on average, 11 MB large; my own experience shows sizes ranging from 9.4 MB to 9.5 MB (except at ISO 3200, when 11 GB seems to be the norm). This means that a card 1 GB in size will store about 100 raw images.
Which is interesting ... if infact the file sizes are 11Mb each (I'm at work so can't test right now) then taking 4GB to be 4,000 MB (which is technically incorrect but something that Sandisk and most other card manufacturers seem to do) this should fit (not taking formatting space into account) around 363 images on (so 355 probably not too far out with formatting space). So why on earth would Olympus put that in their manual and then tell the camera to estimate for the card based on nearly 15MB per RAW file?!?
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 18th February 2008
emirpprime
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: E3 - Picture Count

AFAIK it is a result of the varying file sizes of the photos. Mainly due to noise levels. So the number you see is based on an "average" file size that Oly determined. It keeps recalculating the number that will fit in the space on the card using this file size.
Hope that makes sense.
Phil
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 18th February 2008
Dick Bowman Dick Bowman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/a
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: E3 - Picture Count

The number shown is something like a worst-case estimate because the E-3 RAW format is compressed. I find that file sizes average out at around 10MB, the camera starts out with an estimate of around 20MB. Not quite sure exactly how it refines its estimate.

There are other cameras with similar estimation systems - use the camera for a while and you'll get a feel for it. The displyed number always seems to be pessimistic, which is better than the other way round. Exact figures might be useful in some situations, I suppose.

The E-1 RAW format was uncompressed, which made the calculation a good deal simpler.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 18th February 2008
Nick Temple-Fry's Avatar
Nick Temple-Fry Nick Temple-Fry is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 4,395
Thanks: 17
Thanked 190 Times in 142 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Re: E3 - Picture Count

Thanks All

It just seemed odd at the time to keep shooting and see the space left apparently go up.

I still think the Oly algolrithm is unnecessarily pessimistic.

Nick
__________________
Nick Temple-Fry

Medicine as a science ranks somewhere between archaeology and economics.

www.theChurchPhotographer.co.uk 90 Churches -- Fairford St Mary's, exceptionally splendid
www.temple-fry.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 18th February 2008
DerekW DerekW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 3,106
Thanks: 92
Thanked 337 Times in 264 Posts
Likes: 33
Liked 542 Times in 380 Posts
Re: E3 - Picture Count

It is no different to the Distance to Empty calculation on the car - drive steady after a period of stop start driving and the DTE can increase dramatically.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Picture file sizes Ellie Camera conference 7 11th February 2008 08:22 PM
First picture post Greytop Foto Fair 8 19th January 2008 05:27 PM
Search for posts using a picture shenstone Software 0 18th January 2008 08:47 PM
help - how to delete picture Invicta The lounge 4 12th December 2007 07:39 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:13 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger