View Single Post
Old 14th August 2013
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,589
Thanks: 425
Thanked 2,524 Times in 1,271 Posts
Likes: 870
Liked 1,706 Times in 773 Posts
Re: What will be the substance of the announcement

My biggest worry with your list of points is the purity of Four Thirds you feel you need. For a long time now (well over a year) I have publicly declared that there is no sense in doing a Four Thirds 'only' camera unless there is a simple make-over of the E-5.

But let's look at the E-5, many say it's too big and heavy, the AF isn't good enough, it's loud and unrefined compared to the E-M5 and E-P5 and it only shoots at 5fps. The viewfinder is a major feat considering the relatively small sensor and mirror, but in reality EVFs are the way to go; they aren't perfect yet but they offer much more than a conventional SLR finder.

Meanwhile, Micro Four Thirds is a success story and it offers a high degree of compatibility with Four Thirds lenses.

So for me the challenge that Olympus had to set itself was to build a camera that satisfied both users of Micro Four Thirds lenses and Four Thirds lenses. This is my favourite solution and it seems to be the one that the FTU poll favours as well.

I don't think anyone expects Olympus to satisfy absolutely everyone. That would be miracle. In the end whether or not each of us decides we like the new camera it will be a very personal point of view.

Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (
Four Thirds User (
Digital Photography Now (
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (

NEW: My personal BLOG
Reply With Quote