Announcement

Collapse

December's CHALLENGE

The topic to inspire your creative juices this month is BOXES

See more
See less

What's wrong with these pictures?

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • #31
    Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

    Originally posted by alfbranch View Post
    Did you have the ten minutes and is this thought with 20/20 hindsight?
    No- I didn't have ten minutes to wait for better lighting, alas. One of those moments when you are grumbled at for trailing behind the rest of the family snapping pictures :-)
    Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


    Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.

    Comment


    • #32
      Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

      Originally posted by snaarman View Post
      I was attracted by the incongruity of it all, and I had to stand in the road at Presteigne to get the picture. However, in the end it seems a bit short on impact.

      Maybe if I converted it to monochrome with the exception of the pump, and applied a bit of colour pop to that???


      Oh, and I should have waited ten minutes for the railings to be fully in shadow. All these little things matter...
      Not a fan of monochrome with isolated colour (Iím sure thereís a better term). Having the master file you can easily experiment, what about adding contrast, incorporate an S?
      Steve

      on flickr

      Comment


      • #33
        Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

        Originally posted by Ricoh View Post
        Not a fan of monochrome with isolated colour (I’m sure there’s a better term). Having the master file you can easily experiment, what about adding contrast, incorporate an S?
        Once upon a time I had a free demo (DXO?) film pack plug in for Photoshop, and that had some nice contrast S curves for Velvia and Provia - if you like that sort of thing. You can probably do as good without using a plugin.

        Edit. I just checked. £59 hmm. Sorry DXO, that's too much.
        Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


        Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.

        Comment


        • #34
          Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

          Re the Hartford picture you are right that its more of a record shat of something than a picture that stands out. in terms of a record shot I would be tempted to clone out the bit of mess on the wall at the right... just distracts from the overall picture IMO

          The rest of it seems OK

          re Cloning out as you don't like power lines what would you have done with this...



          Regards
          Andy
          My Kit (OK I'm a hoarder...)
          4/3 E500, E510, E30 + 35macro, 50macro, 7-14, 11-22, 14-45 (x2), 14-54, 40-150 (both types), 50-200, 70-300, 50-500,
          m 4/3 EM1MkII + 60 macro, 12-100 Pro
          FL20, FL36 x2 , FL50, cactus slaves etc.
          The Boss (Mrs Shenstone) E620, EM10-II, 14-41Ez, 40-150R, 9 cap and whatever she can nick from me when she wants it

          My places
          http://www.shenstone.me.uk
          http://landroverkaty.blogspot.com/
          https://vimeo.com/shenstone
          http://cardiffnaturalists.org.uk/

          Comment


          • #35
            Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

            Originally posted by snaarman View Post
            No- I didn't have ten minutes to wait for better lighting, alas. One of those moments when you are grumbled at for trailing behind the rest of the family snapping pictures :-)
            Ah as I thought and a familiar one as well.


            Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
            OMD E-M1 OMD E-M5II MMF3 12-40 pro 12-50 EZ 14-42 EZ 9-18 f4.0 -5.6 40 -150f4-f5.6 R 60mm f2.8 macro Sigma 105 f2.8 macro Holga 60mm plastic Holga pinhole lens lens and a XZ-1 Olympus - 35 SP Trip 35 Pen EEs OM2sp

            I nice view does not mean a good photograph. My FLickr

            Comment


            • #36
              Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

              Originally posted by shenstone View Post
              Re the Hartford picture you are right that its more of a record shat of something than a picture that stands out. in terms of a record shot I would be tempted to clone out the bit of mess on the wall at the right... just distracts from the overall picture IMO

              The rest of it seems OK

              re Cloning out as you don't like power lines what would you have done with this...



              Regards
              Andy

              Hmm. I think I would have moved to the right to take the picture. About half a mile to the right
              Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


              Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.

              Comment


              • #37
                Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

                Originally posted by snaarman View Post
                ........... to encourage some mild critique
                Hi Pete. i think there's a huge difference in what makes a good photo, depending on what it is intended for. 'Record' shots may be very interesting to the photographer and boring to anyone else. On the other hand, the Hovercraft could illustrate an article about 'whatever happened to...'

                if a photo is to stand alone, then it needs to have a clear subject, with minimal distractions, so that the viewer can see what it's about. Taking your first three and thinking what I would do if I'd taken them...

                I suggest that the first one is 'about' the Hovercraft. I'd re-crop around the subject and use an editor to take out the meaningless parked cars. The white van does have a purpose in 'scaling the picture, so I think it can stay. I would increase the contrast to add to the impact of the subject and get rid of as much boring foreground as possible.

                For me, the second one is simply about the juxtaposition of the red metal and the green ivy, so I'd zoom in on that. I think tilting it to a diagonal composition is quite effective and increasing contrast to bring out the textures in the metal. The yellow fungus (or whatever it is) adds a bit of interest in an otherwise empty space.

                Finally, the last one seems to be about too many different things. The Town Cryer is not very gripping in that position - perhaps, as someone suggested, it would be different if he were looking up and there was eye-contact - but there isn't! So, perhaps it's about the juxtaposition of the outdoor cafe, with its colourful sign, making the viewer think "that's a nice spot for a sunny day". The humour is that it's actually pouring with rain! So I would go with that theme.

                I've shown some very rough crops to illustrate these ideas.



                I believe that post-processing is a very important part of 'making' a photograph and I feel that yours make good starting points that were worth exploring further.

                (if you don't like me tampering with your photos, let me know and I'll remove them )
                Mike
                visit my Natural History Photos website:
                http://www.botanicdesign.co.uk/Natur...story/home.htm

                Comment


                • #38
                  Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

                  Yes, I like those crops, and the arguments for them. In fact once you get brave enough to ask for a critique of an image it can be quite illuminating getting other points of view.
                  Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


                  Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.

                  Comment


                  • #39
                    Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

                    Originally posted by MikeOxon View Post
                    I believe that post-processing is a very important part of 'making' a photograph
                    I agree but many do not.
                    OMD E-M1 OMD E-M5II MMF3 12-40 pro 12-50 EZ 14-42 EZ 9-18 f4.0 -5.6 40 -150f4-f5.6 R 60mm f2.8 macro Sigma 105 f2.8 macro Holga 60mm plastic Holga pinhole lens lens and a XZ-1 Olympus - 35 SP Trip 35 Pen EEs OM2sp

                    I nice view does not mean a good photograph. My FLickr

                    Comment


                    • #40
                      Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

                      Originally posted by snaarman View Post
                      Here's another example to have a go at.

                      What's right and wrong with this one :-) I can take it.

                      This is just the sort of quirky detail I love to discover myself. I would have tried moving the camera position around to see if I could align the pointer on the old pump with a gap in the railings - it may not have been possible, of course. The only other thing I would do is increase the contrast by around 25% in pp.
                      John

                      "A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there ó even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau

                      Comment


                      • #41
                        Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

                        Originally posted by snaarman View Post
                        Yes, the rusty wheelbarrow presented itself and I gave it my best shot but I did feel it needed something else.

                        So, heres another picture from my Hannington days.

                        Whats the critique on this one?

                        I'm not a fan of overhead branches encroaching upon the main subject, in this case the church. I would have investigated the possibility of moving a few steps forward and to the right, to see if some of the headstones could form an interesting foreground with a less cluttered view of the church spire.
                        John

                        "A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there ó even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau

                        Comment


                        • #42
                          Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

                          Originally posted by snaarman View Post
                          .....................
                          So, heres another picture from my Hannington days.
                          This is another one where I'd adopt a 'less is more' approach. Unless you really want the whole Church, I'd go for a vertical crop - Spire 1/3 from the left, balanced by the yew tree, 1/3 from right. Just two of the graveyard crosses and the snowy path lead-in.

                          The trouble with wide-angle photos is that they often spread things out too much, and lead to a lot of empty foreground. When taking the photo, you could have zoomed in for the 'crop' I suggested.

                          After looking at your excellent blog, I suspect you might well have done that as well, anyway
                          Mike
                          visit my Natural History Photos website:
                          http://www.botanicdesign.co.uk/Natur...story/home.htm

                          Comment


                          • #43
                            Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

                            Originally posted by alfbranch View Post
                            I agree but many do not.

                            Trying to quote the Quote you were Quoting.
                            'PP the most important part of taking a Photograph' ..... BOLLOCKS

                            Comment


                            • #44
                              Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

                              Originally posted by iso View Post
                              Trying to quote the Quote you were Quoting.
                              'PP the most important part of taking a Photograph' ..... BOLLOCKS
                              There are two things you need to learn to correct this post.
                              The first is how to multi quote and the second is to accurately quote rather than misquote.

                              PP may well be an important part of many photos especially many B&W shots taken on 10X8" plate shots. Ansel Adams often did a loft work to get a print how he wanted. PP is not new just different now. I never saw a machine B&W print that I felt was delivering the potential of the photo. The same can be said of the cameras JPEG.
                              OMD E-M1 OMD E-M5II MMF3 12-40 pro 12-50 EZ 14-42 EZ 9-18 f4.0 -5.6 40 -150f4-f5.6 R 60mm f2.8 macro Sigma 105 f2.8 macro Holga 60mm plastic Holga pinhole lens lens and a XZ-1 Olympus - 35 SP Trip 35 Pen EEs OM2sp

                              I nice view does not mean a good photograph. My FLickr

                              Comment


                              • #45
                                Re: What's wrong with these pictures?

                                Thank you Alf.

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X