WELCOME to the Olympus UK E-System User Group! This site is dedicated to users of Olympus system cameras and lenses and their photography. If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You must register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
I was down on the Southbank with a friend last week taking night time shots of Westminster Bridge. We were approached by security and told that we could not use a tripod on the pavement outside the old GLC building as it is private property. <snip>
My Zimmer Frame will have a monopod tie-wrapped to one leg. An comment from "security" will be reported as disability discrimination.
I was down on the Southbank with a friend last week taking night time shots of Westminster Bridge. We were approached by security and told that we could not use a tripod on the pavement outside the old GLC building as it is private property. First I've heard of that but that was the second time on the Southbank I was stopped using a tripod within the hour. I've never had that happen before and I'm always down there doing long exposures. It made no difference that the friend I was with was still a serving police officer....although he just shortened his tripod legs and placed it on the wall overlooking the river I meant to contact Westminster Council and check out whether it is actually private or public there.
I suspect it's a load of tosh.
Too many cameras!
E-500, E-510, EPM1, EPL5, EP3, EP5, OM-D E M10, OM-D E M5, Trip 35mm, Samsung WP10 and Panasonic G6 plus lots of lenses many manual focus.
I enjoyed that, particularly the bit where a security worker said, "We don't like our buildings photographed," as if that was reason enough. Don't they realise that they are waving red rags at bulls?
Interesting that the Terrorism Act was being waved around like some magical empowerment, but that those "quoting" it had absolutely no specific knowledge of the Act.
Encouraging that, having made their enquiries as they are obliged to do in the event of a complaint, the police were entirely reasonable, good humoured and well versed in the law.
The security industry needs to wise up to the fact that this is Great Britain (well it is until Scotland votes on Independence), not North Korea and we do not relinquish our freedoms lightly.
John
"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there � even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
<snip> a security worker said, "We don't like our buildings photographed," <snip>
Unfortunately most security people are on minimum wage, have minimal education and are simply following the instructions of the supervisor. What these companies fail to realise is that they are misrepresenting UK Law, for their own purpose.
It is possible that this could be considered a fraudulent act. It is at least a breach of trust between the company and the public. Most PR/CR executives will not take too kindly to the head of security damaging Public and/or Customer Relations.
We process personal data about users of our site, through the use of cookies and other technologies, to deliver our services, personalize advertising, and to analyze site activity. We may share certain information about our users with our advertising and analytics partners. For additional details, refer to our Privacy Policy.
By clicking "I AGREE" below, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our personal data processing and cookie practices as described therein. You also acknowledge that this forum may be hosted outside your country and you consent to the collection, storage, and processing of your data in the country where this forum is hosted.
Comment