Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Digital vs Analogue...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Digital vs Analogue...

    OMD-EM1 Mk2, 40-150. f2.8Pro, MC-14 converter, 7-14mm 2.8, 17mm 1.8, 45mm 1.8G, OM50mm 1.8, OM 28mm F2.8, OM 200mm F4 Giottos Silk Road YTL8384Tripod Giottos MH5011 head FL36 and other bits and bobs...
    “I may not have gone where I intended to go, but I think I have ended up where I needed to be.”
    www.flickr.com/photos/141996687@N02/

  • #2
    Re: Digital vs Analogue...

    When I got a 36 exposure set of prints back from the processor, at least 30 of them went straight into the bin!

    Jim

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: Digital vs Analogue...

      Originally posted by Jim Ford View Post
      When I got a 36 exposure set of prints back from the processor, at least 30 of them went straight into the bin!

      Jim

      But that is not the fault of the 'medium' Jim, not that you are for one moment suggesting it is/was of course

      Could well have been the processing, good labs who 'care' about what they produce are getting quite thin on the ground.

      Kind regards, Simon
      “Sharpness is a bourgeois concept”
      ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: Digital vs Analogue...

        You can always have your digital files printed, just like the old days! Several web sites allow you to upload them and they'll send you the prints back, or get it done on the high street . I suspect few younger people do that though, preferring Facebook et al!
        Regards
        Richard

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: Digital vs Analogue...

          As much as I 'enjoy' my em1 film is my true love and always will be, I guess I'm just from that 'period' in time so to speak. In the last six months I may have taken about 100 digital images while at the same time I have shot twenty six rolls of 35mm and fifteen rolls of 120.

          Digital cameras do not 'connect' with me in the same way film cameras do, I do 'enjoy' using the em1, it's a great camera, but I absolutely 'LOVE' using my OM4ti, Leica M6 and Hasselblad 202FA.

          This Autumn will see my attic converted ( now the roof has been replaced ) into a working craft room for my wife and chemical darkroom for myself ( half & half split, it's a very large attic ) so 'I' will be developing and printing once again.

          There is of course no denying the 'digital revolution' has helped enormously 'the masses' and that can only be a good thing, more people taking photographs and getting better as they learn quicker. It has also I am sure, 'saved the bacon' of quite a few manufacturers, how often did we change our film cameras?

          Both mediums are great and co-exist nicely, at the end of the day it is the end result that counts, personally though I do like having a negative to fall back on.

          Kind regards,

          Simon
          “Sharpness is a bourgeois concept”
          ― Henri Cartier-Bresson

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: Digital vs Analogue...

            My OM4-Ti will still work even when the battery is flat.

            Try that with a digital brick...
            Graham

            We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy...

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: Digital vs Analogue...

              I've served my time with fingers in the fixer swirling a print to and fro under the Dim Red Light. Aaah yes!

              But would I go back to the dust and ashes that I remember film to be. No I don't think so.

              Would I like to have an old style mechanical 35mm SLR to pick up and fire at 1/15th (ger-click) .. yes I would. Cameras were like made like a quality wristwatch in those days, and I miss that. I don't miss the dust marks and slightly soft images that I used to get..
              Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


              Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: Digital vs Analogue...

                Originally posted by Rocknroll59 View Post
                ..as pointed out by this lady photographer...
                ...who seems to be equating "film" with "prints."
                Half a brain.
                Is she saying that digital files cannot be printed?
                Is she saying that prints in old albums withstand the rigours of time and decay better than backed up didtal files?
                Is she saying digital photos cannot record the fashions of the day?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: Digital vs Analogue...

                  I love looking at pictures taken in the past be it holidays special occasions candid garden shoots of us our children and now grandchildren. Just because they are now taken by a digital camera need not mean they wont be seen and treasured in the same way. We have albums with shelves full of printed photos' many from digital cameras. We generally only look at those albums now if they predated the digital era. My digital photos are easily and quickly accessible via my lightroom catalogue. My own preference is for the modern way I love the digital revolution. My digital pictures don't fade I can access them on the tele screen rather than as a 6x4. I can burn them as a picture show (DVD/ BD) with music. I can take thousands while on holiday without a bank load and they take up no space at all.

                  When I am long gone I hope that my children and grandchild will still have access to pictures we have taken and when the time is right will still enjoy the pleasure that picture can give be it on paper or as a digital file shown on screen. I can not foresee why they would not be able to view these pictures because of the digital format it was taken on. With respect I think the lady's concerns are misplaced.
                  John

                  OM-D E-M1, 12-40 f2.8 Pro, Tamron 14-150mm f5.8, E5, E3, Zuiko 50-200mm SWD, Zuiko 12-60mm SWD, Zuiko ED 70-300mm f5.6, 50mmf2, Zuiko ED 9-18mm f5.6, Sigma 50-500mm f6.3, EC14, EC20, RM-1, VA-1

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: Digital vs Analogue...

                    Originally posted by Ulfric M Douglas View Post
                    ...who seems to be equating "film" with "prints."
                    Half a brain.
                    Is she saying that digital files cannot be printed?
                    Is she saying that prints in old albums withstand the rigours of time and decay better than backed up didtal files?
                    Is she saying digital photos cannot record the fashions of the day?
                    Hi there Ulfric!

                    I think that she is trying to say that because now we don't have to have expensive printed photographs, nobody will - a bit of a large supposition in my view, but I can understand where she is coming from. In the past because you spent so much cash on processing the film and printing the photograph, you looked after them better and filed them for future viewing, leaving all the poor, out of focus or just dreary pictures in the pack.

                    This is clearly not necessarily so, but to a degree now that I use digital I have thousands of poor photos to wade through to find the really good ones because my work flow is totally undisciplined - whereas I have to flick through a few packs of photos from before the days of digital to find only a few really nice pictures.

                    I am however rather keen on backing up all my pictures whether good or bad, hence having 3 different back-ups of each photo!

                    Cheers,

                    Ralph.

                    Comment


                    • #11
                      Re: Digital vs Analogue...

                      are some of backups in a different building to your computer
                      This space for rent

                      Comment


                      • #12
                        Re: Digital vs Analogue...

                        I have some photos on smartmedia (ok, they have been backed up onto my PC). How many people have smartmedia readers these days.

                        I don't but could have hundreds of photos stored on 5 1/4" (really) floppy, or maybe 3 1/2" (hard) floppy.

                        When Granny dies what do you do with a cardboard box full of smartmedia, memory stick, or floppy disks; parallel ATA, IDE or SCSI disks; VHS tapes of those treasured videos or laser disk recordings?

                        Anyone even see a plated wire reader?

                        Photo Prints, Books, and Vinyl (music) discs are the only reliable long term storage medium because the technology to read them does not go out of date (stick a pin in a cone of paper and rest it on a rotating vinyl disc and you can at least hear something).
                        Cameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
                        Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, M.ZD 40-150 F4-5.6 R, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
                        Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
                        Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
                        Learn something new every day

                        Comment


                        • #13
                          Re: Digital vs Analogue...

                          Originally posted by DerekW View Post
                          are some of backups in a different building to your computer
                          Yes.

                          My pictures are on my hard disk, they are also on an external hard disk in the same room. They are also on a network hard disk downstairs, and finally they are also on overlapping DVD backup disks at work 15 miles away...

                          No, they are not on the cloud. That's because the pictures belong to me, not everyone else in the world...

                          :-)

                          At least I have copies. In my opinion the old style family photo archives are usually in the form of one fading copy of each en-print and no negative (that got lost years ago)
                          Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


                          Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.

                          Comment


                          • #14
                            Re: Digital vs Analogue...

                            I have read of recordable CDs and DVDs decaying, I have a 3 TB hard drive that is normally kept in the garden shed a 100 feet away from the house, every two weeks or so, or after a major photo activity, is taken to the house and connected to the computer to get a full back up the system and all image files.

                            AS the connection is an e-SATA connection the time to update is relatively quick.
                            This space for rent

                            Comment


                            • #15
                              Re: Digital vs Analogue...

                              I remember being being pleased with Kodachrome II slides I took in the 60s with a decent SLR of the day. But digging them out now they barely come up to the standard of a Point and Shoot, or even a 'phone camera.

                              Jim

                              Comment

                              Working...
                              X