Harvard-metalens-better-than-human-eye

[wornish]

https://www.engadget.com/2019/08/21/...han-human-eye/

[Phill D]

Re: Harvard-metalens-better-than-human-eye

That does look very impressive. Nice link Dave although it took me a while to work through their cookie system!

[Jim Ford]

Re: Harvard-metalens-better-than-human-eye

Refused to connect.

I think it's because I've got an ad blocker set-up in my router. It happens a lot with the sites Google tags with 'Ad'.

Jim

[MikeOxon]

Re: Harvard-metalens-better-than-human-eye

Try the original Harvard Gazette link : https://news.harvard.edu/gazette/sto...ficial-muscle/


It looks interesting but could take quite a while to reach a practical form.

[MJ224]

Re: Harvard-metalens-better-than-human-eye

This has massive potential.

Not long to wait for a 6-1200mm f1.2 lens that weighs a 100 grams is 50mm long and then?


https://www.engadget.com/2019/08/21/...han-human-eye/

[Harold Gough]

Re: Harvard-metalens-better-than-human-eye

Refused to connect.

I think it's because I've got an ad blocker set-up in my router. It happens a lot with the sites Google tags with 'Ad'.

Jim

I opened up the post, as though to quote. I then copied the url, without the url tags, pasted it in my browser and got in immediately.

Harold