Announcement

Collapse

December's CHALLENGE

The topic to inspire your creative juices this month is BOXES

See more
See less

silent shutter - underexposure

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • silent shutter - underexposure

    Hi. A tech question if I may.

    I understand that when I select electronic / silent shutter mode, it won't expose for more than 1/8th of a second.

    I find too often when I'm on my common settings of aperture priority and fixed (200) ASA, if I select silent shutter (so as not to scare off subjects) and it's dim lighting, it underexposes without any obvious warning.

    Is there some menu setting to make it give a glaring warning? I have a whole series of indoor dragonfly photos (one got into our kitchen) which are woefully underexposed.

    I'm using E-M1 classic and can replicate the issue with various lenses.

  • #2
    Re: silent shutter - underexposure

    Rob,
    Light is a tricky thing! It sounds like the situation is EV 4 or 5 at a guess. I would consider using an incident lightmeter and maybe comparing with a spot reading whilst exposing for shadows. In lieu of a handheld meter I'd refer you to the 'ultimate exposure meter' by Fred Parker: www.fredparker.com The tables will allow you to achieve an adequate exposure without a lightmeter, and with the camera on manual (forget aperture priority for a minute) do a comparative electronic and mechanical exposure.
    Hope that helps.
    Steve

    on flickr

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: silent shutter - underexposure

      Light meter! That sounds very traditional; some might even say old school. :-)

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: silent shutter - underexposure

        The camera must know about the available light (or EV) so why can't it display this or put it in the EXIF?
        Cameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
        Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, M.ZD 40-150 F4-5.6 R, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
        Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
        Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
        Learn something new every day

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: silent shutter - underexposure

          Originally posted by RobEW View Post
          Light meter! That sounds very traditional; some might even say old school. :-)
          New school can be very misleading and it's no place to learn.
          Steve

          on flickr

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: silent shutter - underexposure

            Originally posted by OM USer View Post
            The camera must know about the available light (or EV) so why can't it display this or put it in the EXIF?
            It probably does. The camera interprets the light in a way only known to the authors of the algorithm(s) embedded in one or more pieces of silicon, suitably doped.

            One of the best investments of our time, photographically speaking, is to learn the light. Arrival is being able to determine the light and the exposure without a lightmeter. I have found the incident lightmeter to be one of the best tutors I've had, again photographically speaking.
            Steve

            on flickr

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: silent shutter - underexposure

              I get the points that have been made, but when you're using aperture priority, isn't it reasonable to expect some kind of warning if it knows it will underexpose?

              Comment


              • #8
                Re: silent shutter - underexposure

                Maybe it's because the authors were suitable doped?

                Sent from my SM-G930F using Tapatalk
                Ed

                What if the Hokey Cokey is what its all about?

                Comment


                • #9
                  Re: silent shutter - underexposure

                  Originally posted by RobEW View Post
                  I get the points that have been made, but when you're using aperture priority, isn't it reasonable to expect some kind of warning if it knows it will underexpose?
                  The Oly experts talk about 'blinkies' for under and over exposure warning. It's described in the 'text book' supplied with the camera, in pdf form, as far as I remember.
                  I would say sod aperture priority in difficult light, the sort of situation you're operating with. You're just as likely to get a properly exposed shot going full-on in P mode. (P for professional, you understand.)
                  Steve

                  on flickr

                  Comment


                  • #10
                    Re: silent shutter - underexposure

                    Silent shutter mode only works across a subset of the camera's full working EV range when the mechanical shutter is used. Therefore you may see underexposure happen for no apparent reason (apologies if already referred to - I only skimmed the thread).

                    Ian
                    Founder and editor of:
                    Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
                    Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
                    Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
                    Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

                    Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
                    Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
                    Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
                    NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
                    sigpic

                    Comment

                    Working...
                    X