Thanks
X
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
You could always use the trick a couple of Canon users I know use. Buy three and return the worst two. Of course, that's L glass, you may not get the same sample variation with cheap Olympus glass.
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
Originally posted by mik View PostThinking about buying this lens while the cashback offer is on, can you tell me what you think about its performance, especially at 300mm and any links to bird images at 250-300mm.
Thanks
Have not got any birding shots but these aircraft shots were taken at Fairford this year with the 75-300 albeit in good conditions. This first on at 132 mmL
This one at 194mmL
This one at 281mm:
And this last one at 300mm:
I love the lens- decent reseults, small and light.
Tim
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
For the money it's a great lens; I had the Panasonic 100-300 MkI in the past and the Olympus 75-300 definitely outperforms it.
The Panasonic 100-400 is better optically, but is also significantly bigger, heavier and more expensive.
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
People mention this lens is soft at 300mm but I always suggest that things need to be put into perspective. 300mm is very long; it's a 600mm full frame field of view. Subject and camera movement is always going tbe a potential impact. In other words, no matter what the quality of the glass, extreme focal lengths like this will be prone to some motion blur.
Anyway, even with the above said, I regularly get results at 300mm that I am very satisfied with. Here's one using the Mark 1 version of the lens, wide open at f/6.7, ISO 200, 1/1000th using a Mark 1 E-M5. This frame only contains an eighth of the uncropped frame area after cropping (1200x1600, or just under 2MP) and is reproduced for Web viewing here at 600x800 pixels.
And this is an in-camera JPEG, not from RAW!
IanFounder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
sigpic
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
I have the mk1; other than the nano coating and a slight refresh of the dials on the mk 2 the two versions are the same. Yes, it is a little soft at the 300mm end; even more so when shooting at near infinity focus. Up close (e.g bird table near your house) you won't notice the softness. Plenty of shots of birds in my garden in my gallery.
300mm
281mm
300mmCameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, M.ZD 40-150 F4-5.6 R, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
Learn something new every day
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
Originally posted by OM USer View PostI have the mk1; other than the nano coating and a slight refresh of the dials on the mk 2 the two version are the same. Yes, it is a little soft at the 300mm end; even more so when shooting at near infinity focus. Up close (e.g bird table near your house) you won't notice the softness. Plenty of shots of birds in my garden in my gallery.
300mm
281mm
300mm
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
Originally posted by JohnheatingmanAccording to all the reviews and tech. references the difference is exactly as OM USer stated above. Where did you see a faster motor mentioned ?
Johnwill do my best to find it again.
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
Originally posted by Ian View PostPeople mention this lens is soft at 300mm but I always suggest that things need to be put into perspective. 300mm is very long; it's a 600mm full frame field of view. Subject and camera movement is always going tbe a potential impact. In other words, no matter what the quality of the glass, extreme focal lengths like this will be prone to some motion blur.
Anyway, even with the above said, I regularly get results at 300mm that I am very satisfied with. Here's one using the Mark 1 version of the lens, wide open at f/6.7, ISO 200, 1/1000th using a Mark 1 E-M5. This frame only contains an eighth of the uncropped frame area after cropping (1200x1600, or just under 2MP) and is reproduced for Web viewing here at 600x800 pixels.
And this is an in-camera JPEG, not from RAW!
IanDave
E-M1 Mk2, Pen F, HLD-9, 17, 25, 45, 60 macro, 12-40 Pro, 40-150 Pro, 12-50, 40-150, 75-300, MC-14, MMF-3 (all micro 4/3rds), 7-14 (4/3rds), 50, 135 (OM), GoPro Hero 3, Novo/Giottos/ Manfrotto supports. Lowepro, Tamrac, Manfrotto, and Billingham bags.
External Competition Secretary, Cwmbran PS & Welsh Photographic Federation Judge
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
I'm not aware that there was a change to the focus motor with the Mark II. I have both the old and new versions so I'll compare the two to find out if there is any difference in the focusing performance.
IanFounder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
sigpic
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
Originally posted by Ian View PostI'm not aware that there was a change to the focus motor with the Mark II. I have both the old and new versions so I'll compare the two to find out if there is any difference in the focusing performance.
Ian
IanFounder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)
Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
sigpic
Comment
-
Re: Researching The 75-300
Just an update and final thanks for the time spent helping me,i did have a Panasonic G80 and 100-400, the 100-400 developed a fault after 11 months and Panasonic said they would replace it.
I waited 5 weeks with no replacement and my local dealer said as he was getting a new one in exchange i could have a full refund, so being a bit annoyed about the wait i took him up on the offer and got a Nikon D500.
The D500 is a proficient beast but the G80 does every thing i need including BIF when matched to the 100-400.
I have the EM10MK11 twin kit as a walk round set up and the G80 and 100-400 for my wild life.
Thanks mike
Comment
Comment