Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

A technical IS question..

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • A technical IS question..

    I use my E510 with a mixture of modern digital lenses and older manual optics. I was pondering the way IS operates recently and I have come up with this question.

    I am assuming the camera has a set of accelerometers and processing electronics that drive the sensor shift mechanism. It knows what lens you have (if its a zoom it knows what focal length you've selected) and it applies the IS correction as needed during the exposure. Thus angular movements of the camera are corrected by movements of the sensor. I figure the sensor is told to move further with longer lenses that with wide angles lenses. So far so good.

    If you fit a legacy lens you can dial in the focal length yourself and its up to you to get it right.

    Now the question: Does the camera also know about focus distance? It strikes me that the problem of camera shake gets worse as you get really close (as per 50mm macro for example) - so the IS correction should be greater. I mention this because I use IS with my Tamron 90 macro but it seems less effective at close quarters.

    Answers on a postcard please..

    Pete
    Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


    Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.

  • #2
    Re: A technical IS question..

    Pete

    I think the answer(s) are

    No it doesn't and
    No it doesn't

    In the first case take the 50/2 which, as most is fbw, and whilst you have relative information passing back and forwards down the wires you don't have any absolute information as the physical control is open ended (you can turn and turn and turn) and not linear (faster you turn the greater the electronic gearing).

    Second, I don't think so. Whilst it's certainly the case that you can observe the impact more easily the actual correction to be applied must be the same ie the right amount.

    Neither of these repsonses are a comment on how it actually works though.
    E, Pen and OM-D bodies
    43 m43 and legacy glass
    loads of flashes and accessories from all the systems

    Comment


    • #3
      Re: A technical IS question..

      Originally posted by photo_owl View Post
      Pete

      I think the answer(s) are

      No it doesn't and
      No it doesn't

      In the first case take the 50/2 which, as most is fbw, and whilst you have relative information passing back and forwards down the wires you don't have any absolute information as the physical control is open ended (you can turn and turn and turn) and not linear (faster you turn the greater the electronic gearing).

      Second, I don't think so. Whilst it's certainly the case that you can observe the impact more easily the actual correction to be applied must be the same ie the right amount.

      Neither of these repsonses are a comment on how it actually works though.
      Hmm, I wonder though.. I assume the fly by wire focus ring is a rotary encoder. It sends direction and velocity to the cpu and the cpu returns direction and step number to the focus motor. So - as you say - they "appear" to be connected but in a non linear manner.

      However it can do a reset to infinity on power off, so I wonder if it can actually keep track of absolute focus motor position and therefore could infer some kind of value for focus distance... Come to think of it, and this would be a give away, does focus distance get recorded in EXIF?

      Pete
      Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


      Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.

      Comment


      • #4
        Re: A technical IS question..

        most exif viewers look for a record relating to focus distance, and the Oly cameras do fill that field - but the data is clearly rubbish when analysed.

        if you are postulating that it would be possible for the camera to record then I maintain the answer is no - it won't know when the ring is overshooting either way, but still clicking/spinning away ie at min and max range the messages will still be created and sent but the motors won't be able to deliver.
        E, Pen and OM-D bodies
        43 m43 and legacy glass
        loads of flashes and accessories from all the systems

        Comment


        • #5
          Re: A technical IS question..

          Ok, so maybe the whole AF thing is optical phase detect and relative not absolute motion, within a standard feedback loop.

          I guess I was wondering if you use IS with your (for example 90mm) legacy lens - maybe you get better IS results if you set it as a 200mm lens when operating really close, to offset the effect of greater magnification.??

          Difficult to test I know, but just a point...

          Pete
          Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


          Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.

          Comment


          • #6
            Re: A technical IS question..

            I'm pretty sure that focus distance is recorded from the lens. It had nothing to do with the fly by wire nature of the manual focus contol. The position of the focusing elements will be knownand so focus distance determined, if for nothing else, for flash power output control. I don't know if the focus distance would be used in the IS calculations - a good question! I will try to get definitive answers...

            Ian
            Founder and editor of:
            Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
            Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
            Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
            Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

            Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
            Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
            Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
            NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
            sigpic

            Comment


            • #7
              Re: A technical IS question..

              Originally posted by snaarman View Post
              ...

              Now the question: Does the camera also know about focus distance?
              Answers on a postcard please..

              Pete
              Pete,
              The focus distance is known to the camera - from the AF detectors. It is recorded in the EXIF - in the Maker Notes section with the Tag name "FocusDistance" and is in units = metres. There is also another EXIF Tag called "FocusStepCount" which I assume to be the target value that is being used to drive the AF stepper motor in the lens.
              The EXIF also contains fields recording (actual) FocalLength and ZoomStepCount - so the IS controller has all the necessary parameters.

              Many folk state that the recorded EXIF FocusDistance value is wildly inaccurate but, and I really don't want to start any disputes, this may be because the AF didn't actually focus on the exact point that the operator had intended.
              Chris

              Comment

              Working...
              X