Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Out of Focus area > The lounge

The lounge Relax, take a break from photo and camera talk - have a chat about something else for a change. Just keep it clean and polite!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30th November 2007
Paulpp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Uploading photos

For those of us (I am assuming there is at least one more than me?) what is the best way of resizing an image to get it to the 512kb limit? In particular is there a direct relationship between the file size shown in Elements and what the file size will be when it is saved as a jpg?
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30th November 2007
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,338
Thanks: 412
Thanked 2,421 Times in 1,218 Posts
Likes: 815
Liked 1,627 Times in 723 Posts
Re: Uploading photos

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulpp View Post
For those of us (I am assuming there is at least one more than me?) what is the best way of resizing an image to get it to the 512kb limit? In particular is there a direct relationship between the file size shown in Elements and what the file size will be when it is saved as a jpg?
Yes - sorry, this can be a very confusing issue!

Usually, an 800 pixel wide image saved as JPEG (don't use Save for Web as this strips out the exif data) will save to a size of around 200K, depending on the complexity of the image - the more complex and detailed, the less compressed it can be.

The image data size you may be seeing in Photoshop edit mode indicates the uncompressed size of the image (each pixel is 3 bytes (3 sets of 8 bits of colour data - RGB), so an 800x600 image may add up to 1.4MB, but JPEG compressed it becomes 200K.

Does that help?

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30th November 2007
Paulpp
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Uploading photos

Thanks, so do I take it that a 800 pixel wide image will display ok, or is it better to go for 1600 wide which I presume would give around 400K?
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 30th November 2007
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,338
Thanks: 412
Thanked 2,421 Times in 1,218 Posts
Likes: 815
Liked 1,627 Times in 723 Posts
Re: Uploading photos

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulpp View Post
Thanks, so do I take it that a 800 pixel wide image will display ok, or is it better to go for 1600 wide which I presume would give around 400K?
800 pixels wide is a good size for on-screen viewing. Or 700 pixels tall.

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 30th November 2007
shenstone's Avatar
shenstone shenstone is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 3,338
Thanks: 152
Thanked 314 Times in 238 Posts
Likes: 399
Liked 487 Times in 270 Posts
Re: Uploading photos

Quote:
Originally Posted by Paulpp View Post
Thanks, so do I take it that a 800 pixel wide image will display ok, or is it better to go for 1600 wide which I presume would give around 400K?
800 has other advantages on the web - most people are still using monitors that are not natively as wide as 1600 pixels and therefore you will be presenting either an image in that has been adjusted for viewing by the browser software that the user is using which is always less precise than you can be in your original photo editing tool
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:11 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger