Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Lens focus > Telephoto

Telephoto Lenses with focal lengths longer than 60mm.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 30th November 2011
birdboy birdboy is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,362
Thanks: 343
Thanked 236 Times in 199 Posts
Likes: 180
Liked 319 Times in 155 Posts
EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

I have struggled to understand what settings to use on my E3 + EC14 or EC20 + 50-200mmSWD for bird pictures.

The general consensus is that the EC20 is not suitable for the 50-200mmSWD in anything other than very good light conditions say a light value of 12+. I have found that by trying to stay within the rules I get very disappointing pictures. So I have rebelled. I shot Aperture priority with Auto ISO settings and the limit raised to 2000.

The guidance for DSLR users seems to be avoid; low light conditions, high ISO, low shutter speeds and small aperture settings (certainly nothing above f8).

I took the following photo today after much experimenting with settings.
This one was taken handheld at about 5.5m away with E3 +50-200mmSWD at 1/250 f16 ISO 1250 IS1 Light valve of 9.3. No cropping.

PB306057a.jpg

This one was taken handheld at about 5.5m away with E3 +EC20+50-200mmSWD at 1/30 f16 ISO 2000 IS1 Light valve of 8.6. No Cropping.

PB306061.jpg


Whilst I accept that it is not the sharpest picture it will suffice as a record, its not a one off the others I took with these settings are similar.

The key seems to be to use an aperture of f16 which gives a depth of field of 80mm at this distance and focal length. The only logical explanation I can think of is that the quality of the glass 50-200mmSWD is not that good at the edges and stopping down uses less glass and so better sharpness.

My conclusions is that for this type of shot use f11 for EC14 and f16 for the EC20 with the 50-200mmSWD and do not be too frightened to use high ISOs.
__________________
John

OM-D E-M1, 12-40 f2.8 Pro, Tamron 14-150mm f5.8, E5, E3, Zuiko 50-200mm SWD, Zuiko 12-60mm SWD, Zuiko ED 70-300mm f5.6, 50mmf2, Zuiko ED 9-18mm f5.6, Sigma 50-500mm f6.3, EC14, EC20, RM-1, VA-1
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 30th November 2011
benvendetta's Avatar
benvendetta benvendetta is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pontypool, South Wales
Posts: 3,736
Thanks: 83
Thanked 294 Times in 260 Posts
Likes: 166
Liked 337 Times in 227 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

I only have the non SWD 50-200 with the EC-20 combo, but I find f9 to give the best image quality (with my E-3). As for high ISO values it all depends what you are shooting. I wouldn't want to go too high with wildlife (800 absolutely the max) but for something like sports I would push it too 1600 or at a push 2000.
__________________
Dave

E-M1 Mk2, Pen F, HLD-9, 17, 25, 45, 60 macro, 12-40 Pro, 40-150 Pro, 12-50, 40-150, 75-300, MC-14, MMF-3 (all micro 4/3rds), 7-14 (4/3rds), 50, 135 (OM), GoPro Hero 3, Novo/Giottos/ Manfrotto supports. Lowepro, Tamrac and Billingham bags.

External Competition Secretary, Cwmbran PS & Welsh Photographic Federation Judge
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 30th November 2011
David Morison's Avatar
David Morison David Morison is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fulbeck, Lincolnshire
Posts: 3,507
Thanks: 71
Thanked 588 Times in 472 Posts
Likes: 48
Liked 298 Times in 175 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

I agree with what Dave says re. photographing wildlife. Whilst I mainly use Auto ISO I do set the upper limit for most wildlife shots at 800-1000. The vast majority of my images of birds in particular are subject to large cropping, sometimes up to 100% and irrespective of whether you have an old or new sensor this will always result in image degradation if higher ISO values are used. I know because I've tried it and sometimes it is necessary if you want an image at all, but it will only produce a record shot.

David
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 1st December 2011
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A Brit now living in Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,605
Thanks: 39
Thanked 678 Times in 640 Posts
Likes: 254
Liked 1,310 Times in 792 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

As someone who shot film for 30+ years with Kodachrome and later Provia 100 as my high speed film it's nice to be able to crank the ISO up to 400 if I need to.
__________________
It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

David M's Photoblog or follow me on Instagram.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 1st December 2011
Greytop's Avatar
Greytop Greytop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berkshire, UK.
Posts: 6,550
Thanks: 1,129
Thanked 608 Times in 556 Posts
Likes: 1,603
Liked 868 Times in 308 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

Here's an ISO1000 example using the EC-20 and 50-200 SWD. Lighting was less than ideal in this case and I find that the combination will quite comfortably stand a wide open aperture (which helps).



Here's another at ISO1600, again wide open.

__________________
Regards Huw


Olympus equipment (mainly)
Capture One Pro
My flickr
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 1st December 2011
birdboy birdboy is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,362
Thanks: 343
Thanked 236 Times in 199 Posts
Likes: 180
Liked 319 Times in 155 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

Thanks for your replies. What I think these illustrate comes down to the quality of your particulate lens. The better quality lenses (of the same model) allow you to shot wide open. I have watched with envy your photo’s taken with this combo and have never been able to reproduce anything near that sharpness wide open or near wide open even under test conditions with a focus card, tripod, mirror lock etc.

I accept without doubt that its best to shot with low ISO but there is compromise when the light is not good and your lens won’t allow you to get sharp pictures wide open.

Huw I think your examples are fantastic but you must have a very good example of the 50-200mmSWD lens don’t’ ever let it go.

I have seen posts about poor quality shots using the EC20 and not even Olympus recommend using this combo with the 50-200mmSWD lens. I have emailed the Olympus helpdesk only to be told that there is nothing wrong with the expected quality of my pictures. The question is do you think this variability in picture quality is down to the lens quality or something else in the way in which the picture is taken. If you pay 1,000 for a lens is this variability acceptable? It’s a factor as it puts me off of buying another Olympus lens new or second hand. My suspicion is that sometimes only the poorer quality lens end up being sold second hand.

I posted this more aimed at those like me who appear to have a poor quality 50-200SWD lens and see if stopping down gives something more acceptable.

Does anyone know if this could be fixed or improved if it took a visit to the Olympus repair shop?

Thanks for your interest in this thread.
John
__________________
John

OM-D E-M1, 12-40 f2.8 Pro, Tamron 14-150mm f5.8, E5, E3, Zuiko 50-200mm SWD, Zuiko 12-60mm SWD, Zuiko ED 70-300mm f5.6, 50mmf2, Zuiko ED 9-18mm f5.6, Sigma 50-500mm f6.3, EC14, EC20, RM-1, VA-1
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 1st December 2011
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A Brit now living in Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,605
Thanks: 39
Thanked 678 Times in 640 Posts
Likes: 254
Liked 1,310 Times in 792 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

So have you tried controlled tests using a tripod and taking your protective filter off?
__________________
It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

David M's Photoblog or follow me on Instagram.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 1st December 2011
birdboy birdboy is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,362
Thanks: 343
Thanked 236 Times in 199 Posts
Likes: 180
Liked 319 Times in 155 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by David M View Post
So have you tried controlled tests using a tripod and taking your protective filter off?
Yes Dave I have tried this and changed the UV filter for a Marumi Digital High Grade filter. Are your shots taken with a filter?

The Olympus help desk gave me the following reply:
"In general, the maximum aperture isn't usually very sharp, and the lens gets sharper as you stop down. But if you stop down too far then the image starts getting blurry again. At the largest aperture, you're using the complete surface of every optical element, and every flaw (either in design or manufacturing) shows up. As you stop down, you use less of many of the optical elements, so many of the flaws have less of an impact on image quality. But if you stop down too far, then diffraction starts making the image less sharp. Once you stop down past about f/15, the image starts getting softer instead of sharper."

It seems to me that Olympus specs allow for this variation and if you have a good one look after it, if not tough.

John
__________________
John

OM-D E-M1, 12-40 f2.8 Pro, Tamron 14-150mm f5.8, E5, E3, Zuiko 50-200mm SWD, Zuiko 12-60mm SWD, Zuiko ED 70-300mm f5.6, 50mmf2, Zuiko ED 9-18mm f5.6, Sigma 50-500mm f6.3, EC14, EC20, RM-1, VA-1
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 1st December 2011
andym's Avatar
andym andym is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Epping Forest
Posts: 4,348
Thanks: 37
Thanked 345 Times in 257 Posts
Likes: 39
Liked 1,004 Times in 297 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

Out of interest have you tried these type of shots without either of the converters and see if you still have the problem.

I do not have the EC20 but my old 50-200 with the EC14 works a treat.I normally shoot at about f6.3 and if I can get the shutter speed up over 200th of a second don't use IS.

Is you IS on or off?
__________________
All the best

Being left handed my brain sometimes works sdrawkcab

Andy

Lots of cameras and lenses.


My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 1st December 2011
Greytop's Avatar
Greytop Greytop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berkshire, UK.
Posts: 6,550
Thanks: 1,129
Thanked 608 Times in 556 Posts
Likes: 1,603
Liked 868 Times in 308 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

John, if I were in your shoes I would be inclined to run some controlled tests, tripod mounted, mirror lock-up, IS off with and without the converters and the 50-200 wide open, auto and manual focus. Target something nice and defined like small news print cello-taped to a wall.
The goal.. to check focus accuracy.

I suspect it may well be the pairing of your body and lens plus converters requiring focus adjustment. Having to stop down as much as you have suggests to me that might well be the problem.

I know that focus adjustment is not available with the E-3 but sending the body and lenses away to Olympus for calibration is a possibility if this test confirms that auto-focus is off but manual focus gives you a sharp result.

I'll just add that I have owned two examples of the 50-200 SWD and both have been excellent performers. Maybe I have been lucky but my experience with Oly lens QA and performance out of the box has been outstanding. That's not to say there are not bad copies out there of course.
__________________
Regards Huw


Olympus equipment (mainly)
Capture One Pro
My flickr
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 1st December 2011
Nick Temple-Fry's Avatar
Nick Temple-Fry Nick Temple-Fry is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 4,395
Thanks: 17
Thanked 190 Times in 142 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

'hmm.

For those that haven't followed the various discussions see

http://e-group.uk.net/forum/showthread.php?t=15105

http://e-group.uk.net/forum/showthread.php?t=15532

I do find that my 50-200 is sharp from close to wide open, and this would tend to match other peoples experience. And the lens (in either swd or the original form - which I use) is not renowned for variability. I have posted (as have others) pictures using the 50-200 and the telecoverters and these have not needed to use high f-numbers to achieve sharpness. And I would certainly expect to see some diffraction softening affecting the images shot as high as f16 and f22, particularly as you move towards the rear of the dof away from the exact focus point.

So Birdboys conclusions are at odds with my, and the general experience of users with this combination.

(by the way has any one noted that he achieved a reasonable image at 1/30'th of a second at 400mm, a formidable achievement).

I do wonder whether something else is happenning here, though I've no real idea what.

I would concur that high iso is not to be necessarily feared, if it gives a better exposure of all parts of a scene then that weighs against the increase in general noise.

I'd also wonder if the implications of sensor noise and the use of teleconverters is really understood (at least by me). A teleconverter doesn't really increase the focal length of a lens, it spreads the central portion of an image over the whole area of the sensor (thereby apparently increasing the focal length), discarding the rest. Thus any detail boundary will cover a greater number of pixels (as will airy discs and other undesirable artifacts), but if the detail is larger then it will be be less likely to be disrupted. I've no real idea how the relationship pays off as magnification and iso increases.

Nick
__________________
Nick Temple-Fry

Medicine as a science ranks somewhere between archaeology and economics.

www.theChurchPhotographer.co.uk 90 Churches -- Fairford St Mary's, exceptionally splendid
www.temple-fry.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 1st December 2011
birdboy birdboy is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: Essex
Posts: 1,362
Thanks: 343
Thanked 236 Times in 199 Posts
Likes: 180
Liked 319 Times in 155 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by andym View Post
Out of interest have you tried these type of shots without either of the converters and see if you still have the problem.

Is you IS on or off?
Andy I have tried this without the EC20 the first picture was posted taken with that combo i.e. E3 + 50-200mmSWD.

IS1 was used and seems to work very well as the second picture was taken at 1/30".

Quote:
Originally Posted by Greytop View Post
John, if I were in your shoes I would be inclined to run some controlled tests, tripod mounted, mirror lock-up, IS off with and without the converters and the 50-200 wide open, auto and manual focus. Target something nice and defined like small news print cello-taped to a wall.
The goal.. to check focus accuracy.

I suspect it may well be the pairing of your body and lens plus converters requiring focus adjustment. Having to stop down as much as you have suggests to me that might well be the problem.

I know that focus adjustment is not available with the E-3 but sending the body and lenses away to Olympus for calibration is a possibility if this test confirms that auto-focus is off but manual focus gives you a sharp result.

I'll just add that I have owned two examples of the 50-200 SWD and both have been excellent performers. Maybe I have been lucky but my experience with Oly lens QA and performance out of the box has been outstanding. That's not to say there are not bad copies out there of course.
Greytop I've done the control tests without either telecoverter and AF is spot on but the image is very soft and only sharpens up when I stop down to say f5.6.

The first was taken wide open at f3.5 no crop

PB275937.jpg

The second was taken at f5.6 no crop and although there is a change of depth in field there is also and increase in sharpness.

PB275942.jpg


Nick I do not think in my case this is a teleconverter problem because of the problems with the lens on its own. I note your own experience of this lens and others that post on this forum.

I thank you all your replies and as Nick has pointed out I've written on this before. I am really trying to find a work around and share with others my experiences. I did take all my equipment to my local camera repair man who used to work for Olympus before setting himself up in business. He cleaned all the lenses contacts and sensor. But the problem still exists and the only conclusion is if this is normal then I have a rough lens that should not have got through quality control but Olympus repair do not think it is a quality issue.

I do think this is a quality issue and that others like me eventually give up.

John
__________________
John

OM-D E-M1, 12-40 f2.8 Pro, Tamron 14-150mm f5.8, E5, E3, Zuiko 50-200mm SWD, Zuiko 12-60mm SWD, Zuiko ED 70-300mm f5.6, 50mmf2, Zuiko ED 9-18mm f5.6, Sigma 50-500mm f6.3, EC14, EC20, RM-1, VA-1
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 1st December 2011
Nick Temple-Fry's Avatar
Nick Temple-Fry Nick Temple-Fry is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 4,395
Thanks: 17
Thanked 190 Times in 142 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

Quote:
Originally Posted by birdboy View Post

The first was taken wide open at f3.5 no crop

Attachment 1904

The second was taken at f5.6 no crop and although there is a change of depth in field there is also and increase in sharpness.

Attachment 1905


John
I'm not an expert on these charts, and it's difficult to be sure on such small images. But I do wonder if you are getting some front focus on the lens/camera. On both charts the first full width line in front of the 0 line appears sharper than the corresponding line behind the 0 line. This strikes me as odd because dof should extend further backwards than it does forewards.

Though the test set-up would need to be repeated a number of times to be sure that it's not a minor alignment problem in testing.

In fact having written this I note that the target is not central - and in both cases the actual focus point appears to be on the bottom (SSSE) of the taget circle - and on the F3.5 chart that appears to be the sharpest point.

I wonder - but mostly if someone with more experience of using these charts can comment.

Nick
__________________
Nick Temple-Fry

Medicine as a science ranks somewhere between archaeology and economics.

www.theChurchPhotographer.co.uk 90 Churches -- Fairford St Mary's, exceptionally splendid
www.temple-fry.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 1st December 2011
gazza95 gazza95 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Oxford
Posts: 198
Thanks: 11
Thanked 44 Times in 27 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked 17 Times in 12 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

Hi Birdboy

This is similar to another thread around the 50-200 a couple of weeks ago. From testing I did on my 50-200 non SWD at that time it does seem sharpest at around F5.6 or F8 with a 1.4 converter. If you look at various lens reports for the 50-200 this seems to be typical.

If I want to get sharp pictures then I use a minimum of 1/600 or 1/800 with the converter and a monopod. Seems I don't have the steadiest of hands. These are without IS as many of my pictures involve panning of some sort.

I mainly shoot Aperture priority now and then adjust ISO to get shutter speed I want.

By doing this I am pretty sure that the duff pictures I get are due to bad focusing. To be honest with firmware 1.4 C-AF is bloody frustrating as it will fire the shutter when out of focus and Early Release is set to off. You have to press shutter half way, wait for beep and then take shot and hope...... This is even when using single point target.

With S-AF I have no such problems and can get high percentage of keepers.

It does seem strange that you need to close the lens down as far as you are suggeting to get sharp images.


Gary
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 1st December 2011
Greytop's Avatar
Greytop Greytop is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Berkshire, UK.
Posts: 6,550
Thanks: 1,129
Thanked 608 Times in 556 Posts
Likes: 1,603
Liked 868 Times in 308 Posts
Re: EC20 + 50-200mmSWD breaking all the rules

I agree with Nick I think if anything there seems to a tenancy to front focus in these two images.
My guess also that this test was performed relatively closely to the minimum focus distance. Have you done any tests with several metres between your lens and the target. The target could be something else contrasty that enables you gauge whether you have any front or back focus at distance.
__________________
Regards Huw


Olympus equipment (mainly)
Capture One Pro
My flickr
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Is my 50-200mmSWD faulty?? Aquavit Telephoto 3 11th June 2011 05:22 PM
Breaking and entering! David Morison Foto Fair 6 7th June 2011 09:05 PM
Breaking the rules. ardvorlich Foto Fair 8 25th September 2010 09:08 PM
Breaking The Ice gregles Foto Fair 8 14th February 2010 12:30 AM
Breaking the rules... gusmur Looking for improvement 7 8th June 2009 05:08 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:06 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger