Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Out of Focus area > The lounge

The lounge Relax, take a break from photo and camera talk - have a chat about something else for a change. Just keep it clean and polite!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 13th April 2017
DerekW DerekW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 2,510
Thanks: 51
Thanked 279 Times in 217 Posts
Likes: 12
Liked 292 Times in 218 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Re NN's comment on HiFi
a film made a long time ago by the BBC to illustrate NN's views.

https://www.facebook.com/BBCArchive/...3278384378531/

I was amused at the search for the optimum spot to experience the stereo sound.
__________________
This space for rent
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Bikie John (13th April 2017)
  #32  
Old 13th April 2017
Naughty Nigel's Avatar
Naughty Nigel Naughty Nigel is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Land of the Prince Bishops
Posts: 5,858
Thanks: 278
Thanked 348 Times in 297 Posts
Likes: 1,756
Liked 1,263 Times in 863 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Quote:
Originally Posted by DerekW View Post
Re NN's comment on HiFi
a film made a long time ago by the BBC to illustrate NN's views.

https://www.facebook.com/BBCArchive/...3278384378531/

I was amused at the search for the optimum spot to experience the stereo sound.
I must stress that my comments on the subject of HiFi were made strictly 'tongue in cheek'.

The truth is that I have cloth ears, as I really cannot tell the difference between good quality interconnects costing (say) 50, and those costing 25,000 plus.

I have similar impairments when it comes to appreciating the true wonder of Apple devices.
__________________
---------------

Naughty Nigel


Difficult is worth doing
Reply With Quote
  #33  
Old 13th April 2017
alfbranch's Avatar
alfbranch alfbranch is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Whitehaven Cumbria
Posts: 5,656
Thanks: 1,345
Thanked 696 Times in 658 Posts
Likes: 824
Liked 1,762 Times in 664 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naughty Nigel View Post
Kodak Gold was crap in my humble opinion. (Do they still make it?)

Velvia though, was on another level altogether.

I am also rather partial to Kodak Tri-X, Fuji Acros and Ilford Pan F.
You can still get gold it was fine for family snaps

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naughty Nigel View Post
Looks like a Volvo driver's view of the world.

You should apply for a grant from the Arts Council.

Better still, use the same technique to photograph piles of bricks, dirty nappies and old car tyres, and then apply.
Are you taking the mick of my art
__________________
OMD E-M1 OMD E-M5II MMF3 12-40 pro 12-50 EZ 14-42 EZ 9-18 f4.0 -5.6 40 -150f4-f5.6 R 60mm f2.8 macro Sigma 105 f2.8 macro Holga 60mm plastic Holga pinhole lens lens and a XZ-1 Olympus - 35 SP Trip 35 Pen EEs OM2sp

I nice view does not mean a good photograph. My FLickr

Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 13th April 2017
Naughty Nigel's Avatar
Naughty Nigel Naughty Nigel is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Land of the Prince Bishops
Posts: 5,858
Thanks: 278
Thanked 348 Times in 297 Posts
Likes: 1,756
Liked 1,263 Times in 863 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfbranch View Post
You can still get gold it was fine for family snaps.
Precisely.

I don't suppose High Street processing and printing helped.

Quote:
Originally Posted by alfbranch View Post
Are you taking the mick of my art
It has a certain charm, but if it makes you happy.
__________________
---------------

Naughty Nigel


Difficult is worth doing
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
alfbranch (13th April 2017)
  #35  
Old 13th April 2017
iso iso is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Kent
Posts: 1,638
Thanks: 207
Thanked 116 Times in 112 Posts
Likes: 683
Liked 202 Times in 175 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

It is a shame that a Thread on what actually is a topic of importance to many of us, should be dragged down by comments from a Poster, who above, and through their earlier comments, obviously has no appreciation of what photography is about.
Reply With Quote
  #36  
Old 13th April 2017
wornish's Avatar
wornish wornish is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,931
Thanks: 166
Thanked 181 Times in 141 Posts
Likes: 809
Liked 457 Times in 220 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Quote:
Originally Posted by iso View Post
It is a shame that a Thread on what actually is a topic of importance to many of us, should be dragged down by comments from a Poster, who above, and through their earlier comments, obviously has no appreciation of what photography is about.
Name names
__________________
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #37  
Old 13th April 2017
Naughty Nigel's Avatar
Naughty Nigel Naughty Nigel is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Land of the Prince Bishops
Posts: 5,858
Thanks: 278
Thanked 348 Times in 297 Posts
Likes: 1,756
Liked 1,263 Times in 863 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Quote:
Originally Posted by iso View Post
It is a shame that a Thread on what actually is a topic of importance to many of us, should be dragged down by comments from a Poster, who above, and through their earlier comments, obviously has no appreciation of what photography is about.

Forgive me and my warped sense of humour. I shall go and stand in the naughty corner.

I had given this matter serious thought, and wrote accordingly earlier in the life of this thread, but few people responded.

(I also note that the Complainant had made no substantive contribution to the thread.)

As the thread matured and once opinions had been stated it seemed to become quite light hearted, so I responded in similar fashion.

I sincerely apologise if I have offended anyone, as that was not my intention. I had thought it was just a bit of fun.

I have to say though, it does worry me that some members feel the need take themselves so seriously these days. I have also been reminded of why I haven't stepped foot in a camera club for many years now.

As for the allegation that I 'obviously have no appreciation of what photography is about', I will leave it to him to elucidate, and look forward to a healthy and serious debate on the subject.
__________________
---------------

Naughty Nigel


Difficult is worth doing
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
alfbranch (14th April 2017)
  #38  
Old 14th April 2017
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 3,807
Thanks: 326
Thanked 823 Times in 624 Posts
Likes: 57
Liked 3,408 Times in 1,161 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Naughty Nigel - no need to get on the naughty step in my opinion. I wasn't offended at all by your posts. I got the humour.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pdk42 For This Useful Post:
Naughty Nigel (14th April 2017)
The Following User Liked This Post:
alfbranch (14th April 2017)
  #39  
Old 14th April 2017
Wee man's Avatar
Wee man Wee man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Newcastle Co. Down N. Ireland
Posts: 7,686
Thanks: 2,374
Thanked 1,092 Times in 977 Posts
Likes: 283
Liked 1,049 Times in 698 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Yes let's work together with a full range of responses. Think how boring this place would be if every reply was on topic and academic in nature.
Remember Nigel is naughty​ by nature so should be forgiven that is if it is he who is being referred to.

Wee Man
__________________
Ed

What if the Hokey Cokey is what its all about?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wee man For This Useful Post:
Naughty Nigel (14th April 2017)
  #40  
Old 14th April 2017
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3,902
Thanks: 430
Thanked 321 Times in 288 Posts
Likes: 500
Liked 1,042 Times in 638 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

I enjoyed the humour once the 'semi-serious' stuff had run the distance. If photographers can't laugh at themselves, then God help them. I enjoy photography but I also want to have fun whilst I'm doing it.
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Ricoh For This Useful Post:
Naughty Nigel (14th April 2017), Wee man (14th April 2017)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
alfbranch (14th April 2017), wornish (14th April 2017), Zuiko (14th April 2017)
  #41  
Old 14th April 2017
Zuiko's Avatar
Zuiko Zuiko is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunmow, Essex
Posts: 19,980
Thanks: 1,859
Thanked 2,849 Times in 2,195 Posts
Likes: 2,592
Liked 3,479 Times in 1,633 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Quote:
Originally Posted by iso View Post
It is a shame that a Thread on what actually is a topic of importance to many of us, should be dragged down by comments from a Poster, who above, and through their earlier comments, obviously has no appreciation of what photography is about.
Actually, I think this is the contentious comment that soured the mood of this thread. Lighten up, please.
__________________
John

"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zuiko For This Useful Post:
Naughty Nigel (14th April 2017)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
alfbranch (14th April 2017), drmarkf (14th April 2017), Harold Gough (14th April 2017), Naughty Nigel (14th April 2017), wornish (14th April 2017)
  #42  
Old 14th April 2017
Harold Gough Harold Gough is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Reading UK
Posts: 3,426
Thanks: 43
Thanked 487 Times in 461 Posts
Likes: 26
Liked 1,466 Times in 830 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

Getting back to the original question:

Where is the image created? Is it in the mind of the photographer prior to framing? Is it in the viewfinder? Is it in PP? Probably a blend/combination. It could be that what the photographer intended never existed and never will but at least the flavour of it may be the end result.

Some random comments:

When you look through a viewfinder, you see a rectangular image, viewed through one eye.

The naked eye sees two, partly merged, disc-shaped images.

Two normal eyes give you binocular vision, out to the middle distance. One of them cannot see this through a viewfinder, although focus gives some impression of depth.

It used to be/still is a sign of a pro at weddings, etc. that they use a medium format camera with a waist-level VF.

Part of the creation of the image is (e.g. landscape) is chosing the season/weather/time of day/night/. Then comes the lighting and the viewpoint. Some research on the subject may be needed so as to show the pertinent features.

Harold
__________________
The body is willing but the mind is weak.
Reply With Quote
  #43  
Old 14th April 2017
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3,902
Thanks: 430
Thanked 321 Times in 288 Posts
Likes: 500
Liked 1,042 Times in 638 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

When I look through my viewfinder I can choose whether or not to have the other eye open and see with binocular vision - but that's fairly unique to RF photography. It has benefits if you're a documentary type of photographer.

Otherwise, close one eye and see the world the way camera does. Squint and better see the luminosity levels, especially contrast in light levels.

Anyway, back to the proposition that technical perfection doesn't matter... here's a short video I came across of an Australian photographer Marcus Anderson. Definitely worth 15 or so minutes to watch this guy and the results he obtains. He uses a mix of 35mm and medium format, and in his own words he says the medium isn't perfect but it captures the essence of the street in an organic manner. He shoots with almost anything, toy cameras having an appeal due to the low quality of the optics.
Here it is: https://youtu.be/cgB5fxYjZXE
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #44  
Old 14th April 2017
Crazy Dave Crazy Dave is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 474
Thanks: 42
Thanked 50 Times in 42 Posts
Likes: 133
Liked 151 Times in 84 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

The great Eric Morecambe once said to Andre Prevue, "I'm playing the right notes but not necessarily in the right order". One of the issues is for example, if I can produce a perfectly exposed photo, all the blacks with texture, no burnt out highlight but chose not to, persuading a critic that it is my creative intent is often very difficult. Did the guy who looked at my images two weeks ago ever see Edward Weston's profile portraits (no eye contact there), or Bill Brandt's work? No way.

So the answer to the question is Yes it does if addressed to the wrong person and No if addressed to yourself - sometimes.

David
__________________
The beauty of not planning is that failure comes as a complete surprise and is not preceded by periods of anxiety
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 14th April 2017
iso iso is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Kent
Posts: 1,638
Thanks: 207
Thanked 116 Times in 112 Posts
Likes: 683
Liked 202 Times in 175 Posts
Re: Technical perfection doesn't truly matter

It was not a ‘complaint’, it was an observation.
I had not realised the Thread had moved from discussion on an important topic, into ‘fun mode’.
The topic is actually close to my heart, and I had not responded because I was weighing up what to say.
As for ‘lighten up’, anyone reading the majority of my replies to things will know I am far from serious…..
I apologise if I have offended anyone or ‘the system’, it was simply a reaction to how I saw it.
For the record, ‘Does Technical Perfection in Images Matter’ – not a lot. Ben Davis IMHO, has it right.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
The world of technical acronyms jamie allan The lounge 4 20th June 2011 01:38 PM
Technical info required. David Morison Telephoto 1 16th April 2011 07:33 PM
SOLVED Technical Question Graham_of_Rainham Olympus E-3 6 8th April 2010 09:50 AM
Does Size matter.....? Jon*E Lens focus 0 20th February 2010 02:00 PM
A technical IS question.. snaarman Camera conference 6 4th February 2009 04:35 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:07 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2017, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger