Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Out of Focus area > The lounge

The lounge Relax, take a break from photo and camera talk - have a chat about something else for a change. Just keep it clean and polite!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 11th January 2017
mm500 mm500 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: West Essex
Posts: 235
Thanks: 3
Thanked 13 Times in 13 Posts
Likes: 1
Liked 12 Times in 7 Posts
Re: Kodak Ektachrome 100 Revival

Quote:
Originally Posted by Naughty Nigel View Post

However, by the time digital came along many wedding togs were using 35 mm to save cost; but rather than taking 36 or 48 well composed shots they were using their cameras like machine guns, so the bar was actually set very low when it came to digital quality.
I agree. When I used 6x7 transparency film in the studio (Mamiya RB67) I used to aim for a "keeper rate" of as close to 100% as possible.

With 8 shots on a roll (allowing for a clip test if anyone knows what that is: if you do you really were a film user) every shot had to count.

There seem to be a lot of people now that shoot hundreds of images of no consequence.

To this day I am still quite brutal about "wasting images" and if I'm shooting anything of value (like travel shots) I only like to press the shutter button if I think I have a decent shot. This is a direct influence of my film days.

This thread made me look at some of my old transparencies. There's still a magic to looking at film. 35mm looks good but 120 still makes a real impression.

I keep intending to shoot film now and again but my inherent laziness stops me.

Mal.
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 11th January 2017
Naughty Nigel's Avatar
Naughty Nigel Naughty Nigel is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Land of the Prince Bishops
Posts: 4,144
Thanks: 204
Thanked 259 Times in 221 Posts
Likes: 1,059
Liked 799 Times in 551 Posts
Re: Kodak Ektachrome 100 Revival

Quote:
Originally Posted by mm500 View Post
I agree. When I used 6x7 transparency film in the studio (Mamiya RB67) I used to aim for a "keeper rate" of as close to 100% as possible.

With 8 shots on a roll (allowing for a clip test if anyone knows what that is: if you do you really were a film user) every shot had to count.

There seem to be a lot of people now that shoot hundreds of images of no consequence.

To this day I am still quite brutal about "wasting images" and if I'm shooting anything of value (like travel shots) I only like to press the shutter button if I think I have a decent shot. This is a direct influence of my film days.

This thread made me look at some of my old transparencies. There's still a magic to looking at film. 35mm looks good but 120 still makes a real impression.

I keep intending to shoot film now and again but my inherent laziness stops me.

Mal.
I was thinking more of 645 or 6 x 6 for wedding work, but the same principle applies.

When my wife and I got married, almost 25 years ago now (in 1992) we 'interviewed' half a dozen or so potential wedding photographers for our big day.

All but two brought along huge portfolios from recent weddings, and boasted of taking 200 plus photographs in all manner of locations and poses - all on 35 mm.

When I asked why they were not using medium format all said that 35 mm was "just as good", and that "nobody can tell the difference". Needless to say they didn't get the job.

(It was all a bit like the car salesman who says you don't need a spare wheel any more.)

However, what really persuaded us, (and is very telling), was that our Priest mentioned a recent wedding reception which in his words was 'completely ruined by the photographer', who 'took so many photographs that the guests were nearly two hours late for their meal'.

To me this speaks volumes about the lack of professionalism shown by far too many wedding photographers nowadays, who seem to think the wedding is staged for their benefit alone.

I fully agree about 120 roll film transparencies too; there is nothing quite like pulling a roll of freshly developed Velvia out of the tank and holding it up to the light for the first time.
__________________
---------------

Naughty Nigel


Difficult is worth doing
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Goodwood Revival Willom Events 6 17th October 2013 04:49 PM
Yet Another Goodwood Revival Thread smartwombat Foto Fair 7 19th September 2012 10:22 PM
Another Goodwood revival thread gazza95 Foto Fair 13 18th September 2012 11:01 PM
Goodwood Revival 2012 gazza95 Events 9 12th September 2012 10:53 PM
Goodwood Revival 2011 Willom Foto Fair 8 4th October 2011 10:37 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:45 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2015, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger