Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > General photography discussion

General photography discussion Please look for a specific board to start your thread but if you can't find an appropriate one, post it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 26th June 2018
chris's Avatar
chris chris is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 681
Thanks: 65
Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
Likes: 361
Liked 177 Times in 57 Posts
Re: Milky Way

The bit i'm not entirely sure on is knowing where to point the camera! Generically south, but is it obvious to the naked eye in a dark enough area? I have downloaded a night sky app to my phone to help!
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 26th June 2018
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,009
Thanks: 392
Thanked 2,303 Times in 1,163 Posts
Likes: 742
Liked 1,365 Times in 646 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Quote:
Originally Posted by chris View Post
The bit i'm not entirely sure on is knowing where to point the camera! Generically south, but is it obvious to the naked eye in a dark enough area? I have downloaded a night sky app to my phone to help!
If you can't detect it with the naked eye I would think it's probably not going to photograph well - but those more experienced than me can comment more authoritatively.

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ian For This Useful Post:
chris (26th June 2018)
  #18  
Old 26th June 2018
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,009
Thanks: 392
Thanked 2,303 Times in 1,163 Posts
Likes: 742
Liked 1,365 Times in 646 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Nobody has mentioned the 500 rule. This calculates the maximum exposure time before the Earth's motion starts to turn the star points into little trails. For a 17mm lens you need to double to make 34 (full frame mm equivalent) and then divide 500 by it. Rounding up, that's a maximum of 15 seconds.

Actually, for Micro Four Thirds you can make it the 250 rule and there is no need to compensate for the crop factor, just divide the focal length (17) into 250.

For a 9mm super wide you can expose (250 divided by 9) for 28 seconds.

The longer the exposure the better of course and this is one reason why a moderate wide angle like a 17 isn't ideal for milky way shots, apart from the fact that it doesn't cover enough of the sky.

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
chris (26th June 2018)
  #19  
Old 26th June 2018
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 8,394
Thanks: 524
Thanked 418 Times in 395 Posts
Likes: 3,843
Liked 1,897 Times in 974 Posts
Re: Milky Way

All good god photos, but my favourite is the last one with the red sun/moon/light pollution....
__________________
My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #20  
Old 26th June 2018
wornish's Avatar
wornish wornish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,654
Thanks: 231
Thanked 330 Times in 254 Posts
Likes: 1,598
Liked 985 Times in 482 Posts
Re: Milky Way

The 500 rule is a good guide elongated stars are not pretty.

BUT if you set your ISO high enough then you will be amazed at what you camera can capture in under 20 secs. Certainly more than the naked eye.

If you look the at link in my post #2 it shows you whats possible.

Not sure what phone you have but Celestron do some free software called Sky Portal which is very good. Highly recommended. It works on Android phones, apple phones and iPads.
It certainly will help you in deciding where to point.

https://www.celestron.com/pages/sky-portal-mobile-app
__________________
Dave

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to wornish For This Useful Post:
chris (26th June 2018)
  #21  
Old 26th June 2018
chris's Avatar
chris chris is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 681
Thanks: 65
Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
Likes: 361
Liked 177 Times in 57 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
Nobody has mentioned the 500 rule. This calculates the maximum exposure time before the Earth's motion starts to turn the star points into little trails. For a 17mm lens you need to double to make 34 (full frame mm equivalent) and then divide 500 by it. Rounding up, that's a maximum of 15 seconds.

Actually, for Micro Four Thirds you can make it the 250 rule and there is no need to compensate for the crop factor, just divide the focal length (17) into 250.

For a 9mm super wide you can expose (250 divided by 9) for 28 seconds.

The longer the exposure the better of course and this is one reason why a moderate wide angle like a 17 isn't ideal for milky way shots, apart from the fact that it doesn't cover enough of the sky.

Ian
Thanks Ian, I was aware of the 500 rule and as you say, had calculated 15 seconds for my 17mm. Although I am on the lookout for a used 12-40 2.8 pro, so if i get one of those I can be upto 21 seconds at 12mm
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 26th June 2018
Graptolite's Avatar
Graptolite Graptolite is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Galloway
Posts: 936
Thanks: 566
Thanked 186 Times in 150 Posts
Likes: 101
Liked 307 Times in 82 Posts
Re: Milky Way

I've spent quite a bit of time trying to get good Milky Way photos with EM1.2 and never really been very satisfied, and I'm lucky enough to live somewhere with very low light pollution.This is fairly typical of what I've managed to get in a single exposure (this was taken in December - it never gets dark enough at this time of year for us to see the Milky Way. The wrinkly appearance of the sky is due to the phenomenon of air glow - it's relatively uncommon to see it as clear as this) )
EM1.2, 7-14mm Oly at 7mm, 30s f2.8 ISO 6400:

Milky Way and airglow, Mochrum Loch by DavidMB2006

P116926 by DavidMB2006

I think you do need a bigger sensor to really get the detail, or possibly I'll need to have a good look at image stacking, which I've not yet tried.
__________________
David
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Bengeo (26th June 2018), birdboy (2nd July 2018), chris (27th June 2018), Gate Keeper (8th July 2018), MJ224 (27th June 2018), OM USer (27th June 2018), wornish (27th June 2018)
  #23  
Old 27th June 2018
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,009
Thanks: 392
Thanked 2,303 Times in 1,163 Posts
Likes: 742
Liked 1,365 Times in 646 Posts
Re: Milky Way

David, what were your settings (no exif data in your shots)?

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #24  
Old 27th June 2018
wornish's Avatar
wornish wornish is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 3,654
Thanks: 231
Thanked 330 Times in 254 Posts
Likes: 1,598
Liked 985 Times in 482 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graptolite View Post


I think you do need a bigger sensor to really get the detail, or possibly I'll need to have a good look at image stacking, which I've not yet tried.
When the air glow is there it will still show on a shot made using a full frame sensor, plus you won't get any more detail. To get more detail needs longer exposures at a given ISO, thats when astrophotography starts to hurt your wallet!

I assume the airglow is constantly changing so stacking a few shots taken at say 5 minute intervals may help as long as you align them first. Many photo applications can do this for you.
__________________
Dave

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 27th June 2018
chris's Avatar
chris chris is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 681
Thanks: 65
Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
Likes: 361
Liked 177 Times in 57 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Whatched a tutorial on a free Milky Way stacking program called Sequator, looks user friendly with good results.
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 27th June 2018
Graptolite's Avatar
Graptolite Graptolite is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Galloway
Posts: 936
Thanks: 566
Thanked 186 Times in 150 Posts
Likes: 101
Liked 307 Times in 82 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
David, what were your settings (no exif data in your shots)?

Ian
The settings are in my post just above the first photo Ian.
__________________
David
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Graptolite For This Useful Post:
Ian (27th June 2018)
  #27  
Old 27th June 2018
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,009
Thanks: 392
Thanked 2,303 Times in 1,163 Posts
Likes: 742
Liked 1,365 Times in 646 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graptolite View Post
The settings are in my post just above the first photo Ian.
Ooops, sorry - didn't notice that

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #28  
Old 27th June 2018
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 11,009
Thanks: 392
Thanked 2,303 Times in 1,163 Posts
Likes: 742
Liked 1,365 Times in 646 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Can I presume that David's shots (which I would have been quite pleased with ) were despite less than perfectly ideal conditions, meaning there is still more potential?

I can see some star elongation and I actually wonder if the focus is very slightly out?

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 27th June 2018
chris's Avatar
chris chris is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Yorkshire
Posts: 681
Thanks: 65
Thanked 30 Times in 29 Posts
Likes: 361
Liked 177 Times in 57 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
David's shots (which I would have been quite pleased with)

Ian
Id be over the moon 🌛if I come out with anything even remotely approaching those.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Ian (27th June 2018)
  #30  
Old 27th June 2018
Graptolite's Avatar
Graptolite Graptolite is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Galloway
Posts: 936
Thanks: 566
Thanked 186 Times in 150 Posts
Likes: 101
Liked 307 Times in 82 Posts
Re: Milky Way

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post

I can see some star elongation and I actually wonder if the focus is very slightly out?

Ian
Focus could well be slightly off - it's always a problem at night. I usually manually focus to the infinity sign on the focus ring and hope that with the wide angle lens there's enough dof to give me some leeway. Star elongation due to exposure length is usually more noticeable at the corners.
__________________
David
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Milky Way photography - advice please Gwyver Olympus OM-D E-M1 3 6th August 2015 03:14 PM
The Milky Way and a shooting star Graptolite Foto Fair 19 23rd August 2014 07:59 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:53 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger