Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference

Camera conference General and model-specific E-System camera chat.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 9th December 2007
shenstone's Avatar
shenstone shenstone is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 3,366
Thanks: 164
Thanked 316 Times in 240 Posts
Likes: 407
Liked 504 Times in 278 Posts
Question Some Raw vs JPEG education please

I've had the E500 for some time now and more recently the E510

On both the default option I have been using is Raw + SHQ. This in my mind gives me instant files to play with and RAW's for use when I've messed something up (like when I was taking non flash pictures underground and walked back onto the surface taking puctures at 1600 ISO and + 2 stops)

Mostly my post processing is limited to cropping and some gently sharpening in PSP and Once in a blue moon I do something adventurous like changing the saturation, but honestly I mostly like what I see..

Point is I hear a lot of you talk abot manually developing your RAW files and wonder whether I should be doing the same ?

What am I missing ?

Regards
Andy
__________________
My Kit (OK I'm a hoarder...)
4/3 E500, E510, E30 + 35macro, 50macro, 7-14, 11-22, 14-45 (x2), 14-54, 40-150 (both types), 50-200, 70-300, 50-500,
m 4/3 EM1MkII + 60 macro, 12-100 Pro
FL20, FL36 x2 , FL50, cactus slaves etc.
The Boss (Mrs Shenstone) E620, EM10-II, 14-41Ez, 40-150R, 9 cap and whatever she can nick from me when she wants it

My places
http://www.shenstone.me.uk
http://landroverkaty.blogspot.com/
https://vimeo.com/shenstone
http://cardiffnaturalists.org.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 9th December 2007
DTD DTD is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Manchester
Posts: 279
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Likes: 1
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

If you're happy with jpegs, then you might not need to use RAW – but RAW gives you a lot more options for the future and can be better quality.

RAW can mean a bit more faffing about, but software like Aperture or Lightroom has made a big difference.

If you're happy to keep the RAW files for possible future use then that seems a good policy.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 9th December 2007
theMusicMan's Avatar
theMusicMan theMusicMan is offline
E-3 Enthusiast....:)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Wales
Posts: 5,878
Thanks: 143
Thanked 267 Times in 178 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

If you don't do any Post Processing, or don't use Lightroom or Adobe RAW plug-in for Photoshop, I guess you don't really need to use RAW. Yes of course, you could be using Olympus Master etc or another RAW manager, but essentially what RAW provides is the ability to adjust more settings. JPG has predetermined algorithms for the things that you can do manually in RAW.

For example, compression, sharpening, pixelation etc... all of these can be controlled manually using RAW but not so much using a file format that will have already applied many of these parameters.

Does that make sense...?
__________________
John

Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 9th December 2007
shenstone's Avatar
shenstone shenstone is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 3,366
Thanks: 164
Thanked 316 Times in 240 Posts
Likes: 407
Liked 504 Times in 278 Posts
Re: Some Raw post processing opinions please

I guess I mislabelled this so I've renaned it

I know of the power of Raw processing and I fully know how do make all the adjustments I was playing with Rawshooter before the almight A took it over and built it into LR.

It's just that often after a lot of playing around I come to the opinion that the in camera engine does a pretty good job so I end up throwing it all away and going back to that.

I tend to fiddle with the camera settings at the point of taking the photograph and work with those settings to get the image I want.

I see a lot of people talking about how they process everying from Raw every time and I wonder how many people are doing that because they think that they have to in order to prove their credentials as a "serious" photographer. Is it better or is it just adjusting the settings in the warm in front of the PC?

It's like back in the film days when I decided that fuji did a better job at developing provia/velvia than I was ever going to so focussed on reshaping / cropping slides once the basic processing was done.

Maybe it's worth a poll some time - RAW processing - do you need to do it or do Olympus know a thing or two after all ?

Regards
Andy
__________________
My Kit (OK I'm a hoarder...)
4/3 E500, E510, E30 + 35macro, 50macro, 7-14, 11-22, 14-45 (x2), 14-54, 40-150 (both types), 50-200, 70-300, 50-500,
m 4/3 EM1MkII + 60 macro, 12-100 Pro
FL20, FL36 x2 , FL50, cactus slaves etc.
The Boss (Mrs Shenstone) E620, EM10-II, 14-41Ez, 40-150R, 9 cap and whatever she can nick from me when she wants it

My places
http://www.shenstone.me.uk
http://landroverkaty.blogspot.com/
https://vimeo.com/shenstone
http://cardiffnaturalists.org.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 10th February 2008
Solar Solar is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Seattle
Posts: 74
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Some Raw post processing opinions please

I also shoot Raw + Jpeg ... and sometimes I use the JPEG that came straight from the camera ... especially if it already looks good and I don't have the time to play with it.

I treat RAW as my negatives and process the images into my jpegs for distribution just as a photo film developer would, excepting the cases as stated in paragraph 1. I like the option.

Sometimes when shooting, I also find it easy to take a dozen pictures at various quick settings as well and adjust them later ... that helps me learn and doesn't tie me up with composing one shot for 10 minutes or whatever. I find I get more shots this way and often as has come with experience, I find I can shoot pretty fast anyway and not have to worry about settings because I usually pic the correct ones.

But just as a purist, I don't like that jpegs are lossy. I like that Raw is lossless. Once that opportunity (the SHOT) is gone, it's gone!! And if you only have jpeg then you have only captured a lossy version of it and are limited with what you can do with it later.

The only bad thing about Raw IMO is the space it takes on the HD ... but I make multiple back ups to multiple locations and use only HIGH QUALITY dvd discs ....

Another thing, in Vista Oly put out that codec that lets you preview the Raw thumbnails which is nice because XP doesn't have that option. So before I got Vista (still use XP on other machine), I would have to reference the file name with the jpeg to know which raw I wanted to open .... instead of just importing every RAW into LR or Master ....

Just my two cents, but each to his own.
__________________
Those who fail to plan, plan to fail ....
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 10th February 2008
Invicta's Avatar
Invicta Invicta is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Third rock from the sun
Posts: 1,016
Thanks: 66
Thanked 240 Times in 123 Posts
Likes: 18
Liked 80 Times in 46 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

There is an article: Raw Image Format: Pros and Cons

over on Wrotniak's web site. Makes an interesting read on this topic.

http://www.wrotniak.net/photo/tech/raw.html
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 10th February 2008
Scapula Memory
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

When I first got my E1 I shot in jpeg only because I wanted to see what could be achieved in camera. Also because I wanted to learn about the camera and not get bogged down by PP. In recent months I started to shoot in Raw & jpeg to start playing around with raw files and making comparisons to jpegs. Now I set the camera to raw only and feel confident about making adjustments in PP that appeal to me. Having said this I do not spend hours on each pic, more like minutes as I get a feel for the software and what I am trying to do.

Without a shred of doubt altering a raw image is far more efficient than a jpeg. As mentioned raw is lossless and you can revisit it again and again if need be. I would recommend it and suggest you spend a few minutes on each picture ( you can batch process to save time ) For me an image is much about retaining as much detail as possible, especially colour and exposure. Adjusting WB without a hit is also a fantastic facility. With raw you have it in the beginning unlike jpeg where much detail has been stripped out.

This is not about credentials or showing off, but more about getting the finished product you wanted and influencing that. It may not suit you in which case nothing to worry about. It takes only a few seconds to produce a jpeg from a raw file and doing this in real time and seeing the effects on a PC screen is quite rewarding. A raw file also serves as a digital negative, you always have the master copy.

At the end of the day it is only a learning curve, time might factor in, but so far for me processing raw files has been quite enjoyable and I assure you I do not spend hours tinkering with one image!

Horses for courses really, your 510s jpegs will be very very good and if this is serving your needs then do not feel you are missing out.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 10th February 2008
Jim Ford Jim Ford is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Watford, Herts..
Posts: 8,124
Thanks: 437
Thanked 576 Times in 501 Posts
Likes: 2,549
Liked 1,597 Times in 1,018 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

I used to shoot all jpeg, but in the last year have shot raw exclusively. Apart from any arguments regarding quality, I find it _much_ easier to do exposure adjustments in Adobe Camera Raw, than in Photoshop. We all try to get the exposure right on location, but it doesn't always work out. Even with a 'correctly' exposed image I find it can be quickly and easily fine tuned by holding down ALT and moving the 'exposure' slider to the right until the highlights are not quite blown, then again holding down ALT and moving the 'shadows' slider to the left until the shadows aren't quite blocked. This is such a quick and sensitive process compared to the 'levels' adjustment in PS. Finally, you can easily adjust the mid-tones with the 'brightness' slider and 'contrast' and 'saturation' to taste.

Another point that I feel is insufficiently emphasised, is that all these adjustments are non-destructive. The adjustment data is held within the file in the case of DNG files, or external xmp 'sidecar' files in the case of ORFs. In both cases the 'as shot' data is unaltered. This means that however many times you fiddle with an image, the original data remains untouched and you can always go back to it at a later date and start again.

Jim Ford
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 10th February 2008
Nick Temple-Fry's Avatar
Nick Temple-Fry Nick Temple-Fry is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wiltshire
Posts: 4,395
Thanks: 17
Thanked 190 Times in 142 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 5 Times in 5 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

I like this one, it comes up so regularly that you can well rehearse your arguments. Indeed by careful choice of forums/magazines you could devote your whole life to making just this one topic your hobby, in fact I suspect some of the more ubiquitous photography 'journalists' have done precisely that.

So my half pennies worth:-

It doesn't matter a printers cuss - what has worth/value is the photograph, and the photograph is what you can see with your eyes. Line up a mixed series of photographs, some shot raw, some on film, some with in camera jpeg development and then get a panel of 'judges' to decide which was shot with what technique.

But I would also argue it is worth learning to shoot raw, the fact you can play with aspects of colour temperature/noise/sharpening/exposure etc in comfort will give you a far better opportunity to learn to control these settings. Whether ultimately you choose to do so via the camera buttons or via the PC.

I shoot raw, because I enjoy both the composition of photographs and the control of the development process. I also like the capability to deal with difficult exposure situations and situations where the white balance/colour temperature can change from moment to moment.

But does my choice make be a better/more serious photographer than anyone else, of course not (just look at my images).

This is an art, practised for personal enjoyment, both the pallete knife and the calligraphy pen have equal value.

Nick
__________________
Nick Temple-Fry

Medicine as a science ranks somewhere between archaeology and economics.

www.theChurchPhotographer.co.uk 90 Churches -- Fairford St Mary's, exceptionally splendid
www.temple-fry.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 10th February 2008
j.baker j.baker is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: North Wiltshire
Posts: 1,071
Thanks: 0
Thanked 20 Times in 11 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

I normally use Raw and JPG. I have some older photo that I did not take using a Raw option, and now I wish that I had.

I basically have unlimited storage available, so now it is not a problem. (Currently over 4TB)

Just backup, and often.

The E-510 SHQ JPG are, in my opinion, very good, and I only get slightly better pictures when processing Raw occasionally.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 11th February 2008
Ellie Ellie is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: SW Hants, UK
Posts: 2,382
Thanks: 62
Thanked 16 Times in 16 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

I recently started using RAW and thought I'd be converted to using it all the time, but I haven't. There are various reasons.
  • I don't have the time to edit every picture I take, and it seems pointless to use a standard 'fits all' editing.
  • The RAW file sizes on the E400 are so big that I'll fill the computer and external storage in no time at all.
  • I've messed around with deliberately over and underexposed pictures, and no matter how hard I try I can't get the detail out of blown highlights or the deep shadows.
So some of the claimed benefits of RAW aren't there, for me at least. It's still important to take care with getting the picture as near right as possible in the first place.

I think RAW has got a place though, and I'm also far more confident about editing now. If there's a special occasion, or a special picture, I might use RAW and PhaseOne4.

But even so it isn't always the quality of the picture - perfect exposure, perfect colour etc - that's important, it's what it shows. No matter how hard you try it isn't always possible to have the camera on the right setting for "that shot" - the one that would get away if the photographer takes too much time to press the button.

So, I'm going back to SHQ JPEGs, bracketed where necessary, and taking care to get it as right as I can before I press the shutter. And I'll be always looking out for that special picture.
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 11th February 2008
dbutch's Avatar
dbutch dbutch is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Yateley, Hampshire
Posts: 652
Thanks: 46
Thanked 29 Times in 19 Posts
Likes: 21
Liked 13 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

I shoot 90-95% jpeg, I shoot raw if I think there might be an issue or if I must nail a shot, this applies in the studio or out and about. In the studio you are in control so you should be able to nail it, colour and exposure wise, the only exception tends to be young kids, you are having to take pics so quick the flash might not of recharged fully so the expression is caght but it may be a tad dark then shooting in Raw is useful.

Overal I think the jpeg engine in the E-1 is great, the E-400 is good but not up to the E-1

Check out the wifes studio shots (she's Cheesy Grins on here if you didn't know) www.cheesygrins.co.uk most of the shots on there are jpeg

Cheers

Dave
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 11th February 2008
shenstone's Avatar
shenstone shenstone is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 3,366
Thanks: 164
Thanked 316 Times in 240 Posts
Likes: 407
Liked 504 Times in 278 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

I'm glad that I started this thread because some interesting opinions are coming out.

I like your collective tone - it ain't something that people should seem *shamed* into, but I think some people begin to feel pressured that way. If you need it for a shoot or a picture or for everything it's a tool in your toolbox.

I had begun to think that I was one of the only luddites that prefered to spend time in front of the lens than the computer (too much of that at work) and I agree with all the opinions that you can do more with RAW (and I do sometimes and I do improve things, but in the main I just like taking the pictures.

One day I'll find a raw converter that I really like and I'll do more, but I'm not satisfied with anything I've tried so far (and I've tried a lot). Until then I'll use both RAW and JPEG and keep enjoing pushing the shutter

Regards
Andy
__________________
My Kit (OK I'm a hoarder...)
4/3 E500, E510, E30 + 35macro, 50macro, 7-14, 11-22, 14-45 (x2), 14-54, 40-150 (both types), 50-200, 70-300, 50-500,
m 4/3 EM1MkII + 60 macro, 12-100 Pro
FL20, FL36 x2 , FL50, cactus slaves etc.
The Boss (Mrs Shenstone) E620, EM10-II, 14-41Ez, 40-150R, 9 cap and whatever she can nick from me when she wants it

My places
http://www.shenstone.me.uk
http://landroverkaty.blogspot.com/
https://vimeo.com/shenstone
http://cardiffnaturalists.org.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 11th February 2008
ianc ianc is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Kilbride, Ayrshire
Posts: 241
Thanks: 0
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ellie View Post
No matter how hard you try it isn't always possible to have the camera on the right setting for "that shot" - the one that would get away if the photographer takes too much time to press the button.

So, I'm going back to SHQ JPEGs
I'm not sure I understand your logic Ellie of course this could just be my innate stupidity. One of the advantages of shooting RAW is that you don't have to bother about the settings to the same extent. With a RAW file you can muck about with contrast and colour balance settings to your hearts content in PP without any quality loss. You are right that trying to regain detail from a badly exposed shot will never give you as good a result as proper exposure but in my experience you can save more detail from a badly exposed RAW file than a badly exposed JPEG. You might have to spend a bit more on memory but nowadays it is so cheap that isn't a problem and for long term storage you can pickup a 500Gb external hard drive for less than 70 or 100 DVDs, a total of 470Gb, for less than 13. Lets face it the thing that matters is the end result, a badly composed picture will always be a badly composed picture no matter how well exposed, I just feel that shooting in RAW gives more options and a better chance of getting a technically good shot allowing you to concentrate on the composition.

Ian C.
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 11th February 2008
theMusicMan's Avatar
theMusicMan theMusicMan is offline
E-3 Enthusiast....:)
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: South Wales
Posts: 5,878
Thanks: 143
Thanked 267 Times in 178 Posts
Likes: 8
Liked 30 Times in 19 Posts
Re: Some Raw vs JPEG education please

Ellie, Ianc gives excellent and sound advice in his post. I'd wholeheartedly agree with his comments too. Shooting in RAW gives you as the photographer much more control over the end result, than if you only shoot in JPG format.
__________________
John

Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:44 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger