Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Site news and information > Announcements > General photography news from DPNow.com

General photography news from DPNow.com This board is updated by our sibling site, DPNow.com and lists new product and other news items that may be of interest to e-group members.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 8th April 2018
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4,926
Thanks: 519
Thanked 365 Times in 326 Posts
Likes: 647
Liked 1,479 Times in 895 Posts
Four reasons why film photography is stupid

Hereís the facts: https://www.kpraslowicz.com/2018/04/...t-plain-stupid

Result: Film 0 : Digital 4
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 8th April 2018
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 4,575
Thanks: 347
Thanked 1,013 Times in 770 Posts
Likes: 92
Liked 4,528 Times in 1,475 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
Hereís the facts: https://www.kpraslowicz.com/2018/04/...t-plain-stupid

Result: Film 0 : Digital 4
I never doubted the result
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Ricoh (8th April 2018), Ross the fiddler (9th April 2018)
  #3  
Old 8th April 2018
OM USer's Avatar
OM USer OM USer is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: London
Posts: 9,857
Thanks: 1,859
Thanked 1,304 Times in 1,247 Posts
Likes: 4,918
Liked 1,040 Times in 719 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

McAfee doesn't like the website!
__________________
Cameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
If you learn something new each day then that is not a day wasted.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 8th April 2018
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 4,575
Thanks: 347
Thanked 1,013 Times in 770 Posts
Likes: 92
Liked 4,528 Times in 1,475 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM USer View Post
McAfee doesn't like the website!
Who cares what McAfee thinks! It's pretty safe visiting web-sites; unless you go downloading stuff explicitly you won't come to harm!
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 8th April 2018
Crazy Dave Crazy Dave is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 581
Thanks: 44
Thanked 59 Times in 50 Posts
Likes: 164
Liked 209 Times in 116 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM USer View Post
McAfee doesn't like the website!
Donít worry, while the conclusions are possibly OK, this is a pretty banal piece of work.

David
__________________
The beauty of not planning is that failure comes as a complete surprise and is not preceded by periods of anxiety
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Crazy Dave For This Useful Post:
OM USer (9th April 2018)
  #6  
Old 11th April 2018
alfbranch's Avatar
alfbranch alfbranch is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Whitehaven Cumbria
Posts: 6,134
Thanks: 1,468
Thanked 743 Times in 705 Posts
Likes: 975
Liked 2,125 Times in 783 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdk42 View Post
Who cares what McAfee thinks! It's pretty safe visiting web-sites; unless you go downloading stuff explicitly you won't come to harm!
Not always true
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Drive-by_download
__________________
OMD E-M1 OMD E-M5II MMF3 12-40 pro 12-50 EZ 14-42 EZ 9-18 f4.0 -5.6 40 -150f4-f5.6 R 60mm f2.8 macro Sigma 105 f2.8 macro Holga 60mm plastic Holga pinhole lens lens and a XZ-1 Olympus - 35 SP Trip 35 Pen EEs OM2sp

I nice view does not mean a good photograph. My FLickr

Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 11th April 2018
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4,926
Thanks: 519
Thanked 365 Times in 326 Posts
Likes: 647
Liked 1,479 Times in 895 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Crazy Dave View Post
Donít worry, while the conclusions are possibly OK, this is a pretty banal piece of work.

David
And there I was thinking it was a serious piece of work.
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Crazy Dave (11th April 2018)
  #8  
Old 11th April 2018
Crazy Dave Crazy Dave is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 581
Thanks: 44
Thanked 59 Times in 50 Posts
Likes: 164
Liked 209 Times in 116 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
And there I was thinking it was a serious piece of work.
Steve, I just dusted off my unused Nikon 35Ti and am seriously disappointed with the results. This is reputed to be a high-class point and shoot camera that cost serious money when it was launched and still needs close to £350 to buy. The photography is cr*p but the quality of the prints is rubbish. I used a lab for processing and some film bought from Boots. Its a pity as I thought that I would use film for a project tracing the locations frequented by an infamous East London criminal born about 1886. Still got a couple of frames in my XA so will be interesting to see the results from that.

Maybe that guy was right after all and the ghosts of past owners are jinxing my efforts? If you have any tips about film selection, processing, please let me know.

David
__________________
The beauty of not planning is that failure comes as a complete surprise and is not preceded by periods of anxiety
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12th April 2018
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4,926
Thanks: 519
Thanked 365 Times in 326 Posts
Likes: 647
Liked 1,479 Times in 895 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

David, the Emulsive website is a good resource to help with film selection.

https://emulsive.org/film-reviews

Addendum: I would also recommend Twitter for film photography, very active with hashtags such as #filmisnotdead #believeinfilm and of course #emulsive. Just search anything with film in the hashtag and you can't go wrong.
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Crazy Dave (12th April 2018)
  #10  
Old 12th April 2018
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4,926
Thanks: 519
Thanked 365 Times in 326 Posts
Likes: 647
Liked 1,479 Times in 895 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

I would add that the primary determinant is the lens. The camera body is nothing more than a light box with a method of regulating the shutter opening.

Ansel Adams once said the negative is the equivalent of the score, and the print is he performance. I don't think we should expect one of Mazart's concertos to be played equally well by the Royal Philharmonic, and an amateur bunch of musicians. It's the same with printing; the set of prints ordered at the time of processing are generated by a machine making exposure judgements based on negative density. For top quality you need an experienced print technician who can work with artistic judgement, based on the photographer's brief. Having your own darkroom would be beneficial, otherwise it's probably best to scan and print. (Have a look at Light Jet C-Type printing; digital scan printed on silver paper using laser light.)
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Crazy Dave (12th April 2018)
  #11  
Old 12th April 2018
Crazy Dave Crazy Dave is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 581
Thanks: 44
Thanked 59 Times in 50 Posts
Likes: 164
Liked 209 Times in 116 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

Steve, thanks for that, very helpful. I’m ashamed to say that one of my reels had been in the plastic canister for at least 12 years going by the subjects! The other was about three years in the camera. So I’ve got fresh film in both the Nikon 35ti and the XA so the next batches and will try again. I’m really keen that my new project is captured on film. Thankfully, I have a friend whose sole camera is an Olympus Trip and she produces extraordinary images, so have booked a tutorial.

Regards

David
__________________
The beauty of not planning is that failure comes as a complete surprise and is not preceded by periods of anxiety
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12th April 2018
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4,926
Thanks: 519
Thanked 365 Times in 326 Posts
Likes: 647
Liked 1,479 Times in 895 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

David,
For colour Portra 160 of 400 are highly recommended - really nice colours and phenomenal tolerance to exposure, -1 to + 4 stops. Ektar is also recommended for nice colour pop.

For B&W there are many films to choose, HP5+ FP4 Delta 100, 400 and 3200 (expose for 1600 and develop at 3200), all Ilford of course, plus a host of others.

Film is definitely not deceased, it's alive and kicking a**e !
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 21st April 2018
pandora's Avatar
pandora pandora is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Victoria, Australia
Posts: 14,121
Thanks: 726
Thanked 1,336 Times in 1,295 Posts
Likes: 1,460
Liked 3,011 Times in 1,446 Posts
Re: Four reasons why film photography is stupid

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
Ansel Adams once said the negative is the equivalent of the score, and the print is he performance.
A clumsy way of putting it. My view is that the camera kneads the dough, processing bakes the bread.
__________________
* mark * Wangaratta, Victoria, Australia **
OMD M5 Mkii * XZ2 * XZ1 * E3
Sometimes I think the surest sign that intelligent life exists elsewhere in the universe is that none of it has tried to contact us. ~ Calvin-
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Eight reasons digital photographers should try film Ricoh The lounge 20 17th June 2017 03:47 PM
A film maker's take on analogue photography Ricoh Nostalgia Nexus - early and pre-digital discussion 0 12th May 2017 08:24 AM
The top ten reasons... Wally The lounge 7 23rd April 2016 09:04 PM
Photography students using film cameras alfbranch The lounge 74 30th December 2015 08:07 PM
Reasons to be happy Wally Foto Fair 7 28th July 2012 05:52 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:57 AM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger