Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Micro Four Thirds > Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II

Olympus OM-D E-M5 Mark II The first OM-D's successor.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 31st December 2018
JeanieW JeanieW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 15
Thanks: 14
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Question Lens confusion

Hi there.
I'm having a lens issue which should be easy to solve by buying a different lens, if only I knew what to buy.
I have a 14-40 1:2.8 Pro for use with my E-M5II which I'm very happy with - most of the time. However, now and again a little more reach would not go amiss and so decided to buy one of the cheapy Olympus 40-150 1:4-5.6 ED as the reviews seem reasonable for the outlay and its light weight makes it attractive to me.
So my problem is that I ordered the cheapy lens which arrived today (used but in excellent condition) but I can't mount it onto the camera. Putting the Pro lens mount up against the newly purchased one shows and obvious diameter size difference.
I've been onto the company who say that the lens should be compatible with my camera. I've emailed them with my problem and am waiting for a reply but suspect the lens will be going back. Not a problem, but if it doesn't fit, then what exactly am I looking for?
The description of the lens I have just received read: 'Olympus 40-150mm f/4.0-5.6 M.ZUIKO DIGITAL ED'
Many thanks in advance.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 31st December 2018
Mark_R2 Mark_R2 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: Manchester, UK
Posts: 84
Thanks: 1
Thanked 26 Times in 20 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 15 Times in 9 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

I bet they've sent you the old 4/3 E-system DSLR mount lens. This can be used on micro-4/3 but needs an adapter. If the seller said it was a micro-4/3 lens, i would send it back.

EDIT: the description 'M.Zuiko' definitely means micro-4/3, so they've mis-sold the lens.

Mark
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Mark_R2 For This Useful Post:
Cerebus (31st December 2018)
The Following User Liked This Post:
Cerebus (31st December 2018)
  #3  
Old 31st December 2018
090657 090657 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Gloucester
Posts: 462
Thanks: 66
Thanked 34 Times in 24 Posts
Likes: 19
Liked 296 Times in 94 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

Would not decribe myself as an expert but.........have you bought a FOUR THIRDS version rather that a MICRO FOUR THIRDS version? Is the box badged something like `43`? Micro four thirds (m43) is the newer, current mount used by your camera.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Cerebus (31st December 2018)
  #4  
Old 31st December 2018
Bengeo Bengeo is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Herts
Posts: 991
Thanks: 90
Thanked 181 Times in 110 Posts
Likes: 476
Liked 447 Times in 162 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

I guess you have the old 4/3 version that won't fit without an adapter:
http://lensbeam.com/obektivy/zuiko-d...0150-456-obzor

The ' M.ZUIKO' in the description means you should have received the correct lens for your camera.


EDIT - Wow 3 replies in 1 minute!
__________________
Andy
bengeo.com
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Cerebus (31st December 2018)
  #5  
Old 31st December 2018
CJJE's Avatar
CJJE CJJE is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 411
Thanks: 40
Thanked 88 Times in 50 Posts
Likes: 4
Liked 47 Times in 29 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

What is printed on the front of the lens itself (around the glass). If it says 'M.Zuiko' it should fit your E-M5 II. But if it just says 'Zuiko' then it is the older 4/3 lens which needs an adapter. As others have said, if you ordered the M.Zuiko lens they've sent you the wrong one!
__________________
Chris

Black OM-D E-M1 MkII, Silver PEN-F, Black Lumix GX7, and too many lenses!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 31st December 2018
JeanieW JeanieW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 15
Thanks: 14
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

Thank you everyone for your prompt replies - very much appreciated. Who would have thought one little 'M' on the lens could make so much difference!
So now its going back and I'll be looking for the right lens at the right price. Many thanks again and Happy New Year!
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 31st December 2018
DavidB DavidB is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Bucks.
Posts: 78
Thanks: 13
Thanked 11 Times in 11 Posts
Likes: 18
Liked 52 Times in 19 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

I've heard of Cash Converters getting these muddled up (including m 4/3 image with 4/3 description), and a google a couple of minutes ago showed MPB are also doing it, but the other way round.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 31st December 2018
IainMacD's Avatar
IainMacD IainMacD is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Drumnadrochit
Posts: 3,728
Thanks: 1,215
Thanked 538 Times in 482 Posts
Likes: 1,677
Liked 788 Times in 228 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

£90 new if you are OK with grey imports (no manufacturer warranty) and a bit of a wait for delivery?
__________________
Iain

E-M5 II, E-M1, 7.5, 8-18, 12-40, 25, 40-150, 45, 60, 300

Website
Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 31st December 2018
Bengeo Bengeo is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Herts
Posts: 991
Thanks: 90
Thanked 181 Times in 110 Posts
Likes: 476
Liked 447 Times in 162 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

Or £109 new inc p&p from SRS:
https://www.srsmicrosystems.co.uk/un...ens-black.html
__________________
Andy
bengeo.com
Reply With Quote
  #10  
Old 31st December 2018
Promethius Promethius is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: France
Posts: 8
Thanks: 0
Thanked 2 Times in 1 Post
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

A lot of vendors on Ebay do this, but in most cases the MFT version can be identified by having a silver ring between the aperture ring and the lens mount section.
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 9th January 2019
JeanieW JeanieW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Kent, UK
Posts: 15
Thanks: 14
Thanked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 10 Times in 3 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

Thanks everyone for your help and suggestions. I've now got the correct lens in mint used condition, with free postage, 10% off and a years guarantee for £87! So all has worked out well.
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Bikie John (9th January 2019), Darkroom (9th January 2019), IainMacD (9th January 2019), Melaka (9th January 2019), MJ224 (10th January 2019), OM USer (9th January 2019), rsh1960 (9th January 2019)
  #12  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
blu-by-u blu-by-u is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Selangor, Malaysia
Posts: 1,481
Thanks: 176
Thanked 77 Times in 63 Posts
Likes: 220
Liked 502 Times in 269 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

Off topic.

If you are looking for a lens to have a better reach, there are actually a few. there is that Panny 14-140, Tamron 14-140, Olympus 14-150, if you want bright, then there is that Panny 35-100/2.8 and if you want super duper quality, then that Oly 12-100/4

I got that 35-100/2.8 used and loved it. Tried that 12-100, it's IQ is superb But it heavy and bulky.
__________________
* Henry
* Location: Subang Jaya, Selangor
* Malaysia


All my garbage so far.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to blu-by-u For This Useful Post:
griffljg (4 Weeks Ago), JeanieW (4 Weeks Ago)
  #13  
Old 3 Weeks Ago
steveliddle steveliddle is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Sandy
Posts: 23
Thanks: 2
Thanked 1 Time in 1 Post
Likes: 4
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Re: Lens confusion

Recently got the 12-100 "travel" lens as a kit, the camera ticked all the boxes apart from far off telephoto like moon shots, it seems to be ok for some macro (not as good as the TG-4).

Not massively heavy and fits in a leather shoulder bag that I prefer to padded bags.

Some photos soon
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to steveliddle For This Useful Post:
JeanieW (3 Weeks Ago)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Lens Confusion of GAS MJ224 Standard zoom and mid range 13 4th November 2017 07:45 AM
Diffraction confusion! Phill D Tutorials, Informative & Classic threads 26 6th October 2017 11:14 PM
Seasonal confusion Mrs T Foto Fair 6 3rd November 2016 08:30 PM
M.Zuiko lens hood - confusion Invicta Micro Four Thirds 31 5th April 2013 12:33 PM
Confusion on the track andym Foto Fair 1 10th February 2009 02:11 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 01:08 PM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger