Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Site news and information > Introduce yourself

Introduce yourself Don't be bashful - please say hello so we can all welcome you here!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12th May 2018
banjukes's Avatar
banjukes banjukes is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Dundalk Ireland
Posts: 1,544
Thanks: 177
Thanked 282 Times in 275 Posts
Likes: 145
Liked 98 Times in 81 Posts
Banjukes, Return to the group.

Hi, It's been quite a long time since I have taken part in the forum and I'm hoping to partake more often from now on. The past 3 years have been very difficult for myself and a lot of everyday things had to be put aside for a time. However I did miss the Foto Fair forum and the usual contributors to it. As soon as I can figure how to reduce the size of the files (I have forgotten) I will start posting images again. I know there are tutorials here so I will look into it this evening.
Thanks,
Conor
__________________
Conor.
Ever wondered what happens the dark when the light is switched on?
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
bassman (13th May 2018), IainMacD (12th May 2018), MJ224 (12th May 2018)
  #2  
Old 12th May 2018
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 7,634
Thanks: 471
Thanked 369 Times in 348 Posts
Likes: 3,528
Liked 1,647 Times in 851 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

look forward to that Conor....

Also the Monthly Challenge is good ground to start on....................
__________________
My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to MJ224 For This Useful Post:
banjukes (13th May 2018)
  #3  
Old 12th May 2018
Phill D's Avatar
Phill D Phill D is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 7,897
Thanks: 869
Thanked 1,158 Times in 1,082 Posts
Likes: 566
Liked 1,418 Times in 744 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

Good to have you back Conor.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phill D For This Useful Post:
banjukes (13th May 2018)
  #4  
Old 12th May 2018
Zuiko's Avatar
Zuiko Zuiko is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunmow, Essex
Posts: 20,805
Thanks: 1,918
Thanked 2,959 Times in 2,298 Posts
Likes: 2,913
Liked 3,864 Times in 1,820 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

Welcome back, Connor. Most editing software has resizing options, I usually resize to 864 pixels along the longest side at 72 pixels per inch and save at the highest quality possible whilst keeping the file size below 510 kb to comply with the restrictions of the forum.
__________________
John

"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zuiko For This Useful Post:
banjukes (13th May 2018)
  #5  
Old 13th May 2018
Phill D's Avatar
Phill D Phill D is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 7,897
Thanks: 869
Thanked 1,158 Times in 1,082 Posts
Likes: 566
Liked 1,418 Times in 744 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

That's interesting John, my forum settings are a bit different. I've been using Lightroom recently and for the forum I use 960 pixels as the longest edge but 300 pixels per inch (as it was set that way for printing and I've never changed it) and then set LR to keep the file size below 500kb. Sometimes for letterbox panorama shots I'll use up to 1200 pixels wide for the longest edge with the others the same. My question is what's the influence of the pixels per inch setting on a forum post?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Phill D For This Useful Post:
banjukes (14th May 2018)
  #6  
Old 13th May 2018
Zuiko's Avatar
Zuiko Zuiko is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunmow, Essex
Posts: 20,805
Thanks: 1,918
Thanked 2,959 Times in 2,298 Posts
Likes: 2,913
Liked 3,864 Times in 1,820 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phill D View Post
That's interesting John, my forum settings are a bit different. I've been using Lightroom recently and for the forum I use 960 pixels as the longest edge but 300 pixels per inch (as it was set that way for printing and I've never changed it) and then set LR to keep the file size below 500kb. Sometimes for letterbox panorama shots I'll use up to 1200 pixels wide for the longest edge with the others the same. My question is what's the influence of the pixels per inch setting on a forum post?
I've always selected 72 ppi because that is the standard resolution of most monitors, but as you use 300 ppi without any problems it would appear not to be important; I would guess the monitor is sorting this out automatically. I tend to restrict the longest edge to 864 pixels because at 72 ppi that's 12 inches, which fills my screen without having to scroll.
__________________
John

"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Zuiko For This Useful Post:
Phill D (13th May 2018)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
banjukes (13th May 2018), Johnheatingman (13th May 2018)
  #7  
Old 13th May 2018
Johnheatingman's Avatar
Johnheatingman Johnheatingman is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 630
Thanked 369 Times in 304 Posts
Likes: 902
Liked 931 Times in 589 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Zuiko View Post
I've always selected 72 ppi because that is the standard resolution of most monitors, but as you use 300 ppi without any problems it would appear not to be important; I would guess the monitor is sorting this out automatically. I tend to restrict the longest edge to 864 pixels because at 72 ppi that's 12 inches, which fills my screen without having to scroll.
If everyone here adopted that method, viewing photos on the forum would be a much more pleasant experience. Sadly however, many are of the opinion that "bigger is better" which means members like myself who use a laptop have to either re-size the screen or scroll back and forth to view an entire image. Some things never change though so I don't hold out any hope in this instance.

John
__________________
Where ignorance is bliss .. tis folly to be wise - Thomas Gray
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnheatingman For This Useful Post:
banjukes (14th May 2018)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Phill D (13th May 2018), Zuiko (13th May 2018)
  #8  
Old 13th May 2018
Bikie John's Avatar
Bikie John Bikie John is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wessex
Posts: 3,581
Thanks: 169
Thanked 586 Times in 518 Posts
Likes: 377
Liked 596 Times in 408 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phill D View Post
My question is what's the influence of the pixels per inch setting on a forum post?
My understanding is that when displaying on screen, the pixels per inch setting is ignored. It just displays 1 pixel of image on 1 pixel of screen. Of course, there is the caveat that some software might be "clever" and decide it knows better, but generally for displaying in web pages I have found this to be the case.

Pixels per inch is critical for printing though. My first attempt at an inkjet print was from a scanned 35mm negative. I didn't change the setting from the 2400 pixels per inch of the scanner and sent off a huge file to the printer, to be rewarded with a sheet of A4 with a tiny 24 x 36mm print in the middle - probably at incredibly high quality!

John
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bikie John For This Useful Post:
Phill D (13th May 2018)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
OM USer (13th May 2018), Zuiko (13th May 2018)
  #9  
Old 13th May 2018
Bikie John's Avatar
Bikie John Bikie John is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wessex
Posts: 3,581
Thanks: 169
Thanked 586 Times in 518 Posts
Likes: 377
Liked 596 Times in 408 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

And welcome back Conor, I look forward to seeing some more of your shots of life in beautiful Ireland.

John
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Bikie John For This Useful Post:
banjukes (13th May 2018)
  #10  
Old 13th May 2018
Phill D's Avatar
Phill D Phill D is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 7,897
Thanks: 869
Thanked 1,158 Times in 1,082 Posts
Likes: 566
Liked 1,418 Times in 744 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

John & John & John (at least you aren't called Bruce ) thanks for the info. Just out of curiosity then "heating" John when I post an image at 960 pixels wide do you have to scroll to see it all on your laptop?
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 13th May 2018
Johnheatingman's Avatar
Johnheatingman Johnheatingman is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 3,645
Thanks: 630
Thanked 369 Times in 304 Posts
Likes: 902
Liked 931 Times in 589 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

Hi Phil, the size I usually post pics is 800x640. I've just tried 960 wide and it's also fine with no scrolling needed. Some of the problem is due to my eyesight as I often have the forum enlarged to make reading the text easier. Some posted photos however are virtually twice the width of the screen. Somebody posted an image on the For Sale board and you had to scroll up and down, for 2 mins, to actually locate the item

Similar to this post: http://e-group.uk.net/forum/showthread.php?t=45478

I'm using a Lenovo Ideapad 510 with a 15.6 inch screen and full HD display but i'm not sure what that equates to in terms of actual maximum pixel width of photos. I suppose it depends on the enlargement factor of the screen. 1280 x 872 gives a slight overlap in height and width with my normal screen setting.

Regards,
John
__________________
Where ignorance is bliss .. tis folly to be wise - Thomas Gray
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Johnheatingman For This Useful Post:
banjukes (14th May 2018)
  #12  
Old 13th May 2018
banjukes's Avatar
banjukes banjukes is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Dundalk Ireland
Posts: 1,544
Thanks: 177
Thanked 282 Times in 275 Posts
Likes: 145
Liked 98 Times in 81 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

Thanks to all above. I'm using photoshop software and tried uploading to an album I had created in my gallery. No joy!! I got called away and had to abandon it for the evening. I will try again tonight using the settings you have recommended.
__________________
Conor.
Ever wondered what happens the dark when the light is switched on?
Reply With Quote
  #13  
Old 13th May 2018
OM USer's Avatar
OM USer OM USer is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: London
Posts: 9,679
Thanks: 1,823
Thanked 1,293 Times in 1,236 Posts
Likes: 4,806
Liked 1,030 Times in 714 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

Welcome back Conor. For the more mundane posting I usually resize to 800 pixels wide but will use 1024 or 1200 for some of the competition entries where more detail is needed. I feel that this is a fair balance but it is good to hear other people's opinions. I'm a great believer in using Olympus Viewer 3 and use this to resize and quality reduce anything I upload to this forum.
__________________
Cameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
If you learn something new each day then that is not a day wasted.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to OM USer For This Useful Post:
banjukes (14th May 2018)
The Following User Liked This Post:
Zuiko (13th May 2018)
  #14  
Old 13th May 2018
banjukes's Avatar
banjukes banjukes is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: Dundalk Ireland
Posts: 1,544
Thanks: 177
Thanked 282 Times in 275 Posts
Likes: 145
Liked 98 Times in 81 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

Welcome back Conor. For the more mundane posting I usually resize to 800 pixels wide but will use 1024 or 1200 for some of the competition entries where more detail is needed. I feel that this is a fair balance but it is good to hear other people's opinions. I'm a great believer in using Olympus Viewer 3 and use this to resize and quality reduce anything I upload to this forum.
Thanks for that, I'm having trouble all evening trying to get an image resized correctly. My version of PS doesn't show the same screens as others have talked about and the image ends up too small. I will try the Olympus viewer.... fingers crossed.
__________________
Conor.
Ever wondered what happens the dark when the light is switched on?
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 14th May 2018
Ross the fiddler's Avatar
Ross the fiddler Ross the fiddler is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Blue Mtns, NSW Australia
Posts: 12,487
Thanks: 1,894
Thanked 1,174 Times in 932 Posts
Likes: 4,582
Liked 1,508 Times in 898 Posts
Re: Banjukes, Return to the group.

G'day Conor. Good to to see you here again (even if my visits aren't often) & I also use Olympus Viewer 3 to resize (& sharpen) for web viewing as I find it so easy, & that's also after editing in Capture One.

__________________
Ross
I fiddle with violins (when I'm not fiddling with a camera).
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ross-the-fiddler/
Cameras: OM-D E-M1 & Mk II, Olympus Stylus 1, OM-D E-M5.
Lenses: M.ZD12-40mm f2.8 PRO Lens, M.ZD40-150mm f2.8 PRO Lens with MC-14, M.ZD12-50, M.ZD60 Macro, M.ZD75-300 Mk II, MMF-3, ZD14-54 II, Sigma 150mm F2.8 APO Macro DG HSM.
Flashes: FL36R X2, FL50R, FL50.
Software: Capture One Pro 10 (& Olympus Viewer 3).
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ross the fiddler For This Useful Post:
banjukes (14th May 2018)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Banjukes RogerRamjet Small ads seller and buyer feedback 5 25th May 2018 05:03 PM
Return of the Prof JohnN Looking for improvement 1 17th August 2014 07:26 PM
Banjukes banjukes Olympus E-1 10 6th September 2013 08:59 PM
Banjukes banjukes Introduce yourself 3 18th August 2013 09:23 PM
A welcome return! David Morison Olympus E-5 1 30th August 2012 07:32 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 02:59 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger