Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Micro Four Thirds > Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II The second Micro Four Thirds camera that offers phase detect focusing so you can use Four Thirds DSLR lenses normally as well a Micro Four Thirds lenses.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 1 Week Ago
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,222
Thanks: 140
Thanked 226 Times in 195 Posts
Likes: 422
Liked 459 Times in 282 Posts
DxO dynamic range vs. ISO comparisons

I hadn't seen this nifty graphic before, but what it does do is illustrate the uncanny work the Sony and Olympus engineers have done to dig performance out of the new E-M1 mkII sensor.

http://photonstophotos.net/Charts/PD...ny%20ILCE-7RII

Playing around with this app seems to confirm the approx. 1 stop improvement over the E-M1 mki, the marked step up in recorded information to the full frame sensor of the A7Rii (again no surprise), but the distinctly modest relative performance of some supposed industry leading competitors. I expected the 5D mkiv wouldn't show well, but I was surprised by how closely this little chip matches the D500, D750 and D810.

DXO Mark testing has its problems overall because of how they factor in sensor resolution, among other things, but the dynamic range testing they do must be straightforward and absolute, I think.

I'm not surprised Steve Gosling's landscapes looked so good on Sunday!
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
Olympus E-M1, E-M5ii & too much m4/3 glass.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70 & a Sony A7Rii.
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to drmarkf For This Useful Post:
maccabeej (1 Week Ago), Phill D (1 Week Ago)
  #2  
Old 1 Week Ago
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 2,889
Thanks: 320
Thanked 604 Times in 475 Posts
Likes: 30
Liked 2,234 Times in 807 Posts
Re: DxO dynamic range vs. ISO comparisons

Quote:
Originally Posted by drmarkf View Post
I hadn't seen this nifty graphic before, but what it does do is illustrate the uncanny work the Sony and Olympus engineers have done to dig performance out of the new E-M1 mkII sensor.

http://photonstophotos.net/Charts/PD...ny%20ILCE-7RII

Playing around with this app seems to confirm the approx. 1 stop improvement over the E-M1 mki, the marked step up in recorded information to the full frame sensor of the A7Rii (again no surprise), but the distinctly modest relative performance of some supposed industry leading competitors. I expected the 5D mkiv wouldn't show well, but I was surprised by how closely this little chip matches the D500, D750 and D810.

DXO Mark testing has its problems overall because of how they factor in sensor resolution, among other things, but the dynamic range testing they do must be straightforward and absolute, I think.

I'm not surprised Steve Gosling's landscapes looked so good on Sunday!
This is Bill Claff's site. I contributed a bunch of images from my Pen-F for him to be able provide data for it. And therein lies a caution. He gets the data by asking people to perform testing according to his method - e.g. http://photonstophotos.net/Collabora...laboration.htm

Of course, there is likely to be potential here for inconsistent results. I haven't looked in detail as to whether his subsequent processing of the results might compensate for such variability, but it's a concern nonetheless.

As regards DR being "absolute" - caution is needed here too. By definition DR is the range between the darkest usable area and the brightest.

Brightest is the easiest to be absolute about since the raw file will quite clearly show when we've hit the limit on the numerical pixel count - but even then, with real sensors, some channels will saturate before others and good raw processors will be able to realise this and make a half-decent job of colour-shifting recovered areas where there is only partial colour data. Most test measurements will assume max brightness recorded is when any channel clips but you might get a little more with good highlight recovery in your PP package.

For shadows, the question becomes what is the definition of a usable dark area? As light drops, the noise increases of course - but at what point does it become unusable? For some (e.g. DxO) it's when the signal to noise ratio is 50:50. I doubt many would consider that "usable", at least not if there's any image detail in there. In any case, since there's no formal definition of what constitutes the low end of the DR scale, it's hard to compare measurements across different testers. It's also hard to compare across sensor sizes too.

Bottom line for me is that these tests are useful as a comparative measure across a single test site, but not otherwise.
__________________
Paul
E-M1, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pdk42 For This Useful Post:
drmarkf (1 Week Ago)
  #3  
Old 1 Week Ago
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 2,222
Thanks: 140
Thanked 226 Times in 195 Posts
Likes: 422
Liked 459 Times in 282 Posts
Re: DxO dynamic range vs. ISO comparisons

Absolutely fascinating. I never cease to be amazed at the engagement, knowledge and skill of people on this site!

I'll temper my absolutism a bit, although this sort of testing is at least an attempt at scientific analysis with control of some of the important variables. Very refreshing in comparison with the usual opinion biased stuff one reads 90% of the time.
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
Olympus E-M1, E-M5ii & too much m4/3 glass.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70 & a Sony A7Rii.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Comparisons with Prosumer DSLRs? Xenon Olympus OM-D E-M1 18 26th October 2013 05:18 PM
E5 Dynamic Range ? Gwyver Camera conference 6 15th September 2010 03:46 PM
Body comparisons.... Xpres Camera conference 2 15th October 2009 04:40 PM
Dynamic range comparison snaarman Olympus E-510 6 13th September 2008 12:56 PM
Dynamic Range fix in Olympus E-3 dennisg Olympus E-3 16 27th December 2007 11:45 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 09:34 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2015, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger