Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!

Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Software

Software Discuss Olympus Master, Studio and Viewer software applications as well as third party programs like Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom, Apple Aperture, and others.

Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 3rd September 2008
OlyPaul's Avatar
OlyPaul OlyPaul is offline
Senior Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,470
Thanks: 140
Thanked 715 Times in 577 Posts
Likes: 177
Liked 875 Times in 355 Posts

Although I have CS3 and the latest raw converter and have tried many other raw converters I have always tended to gravitate back to Silkypix for raw conversion because I just got the (unscientific ) feeling the tones were smoother.

Now I have come across a article from a fine art photogrpaher that might explain my "feeling"

Editing of Master files: combining SilkyPix and Photoshop
SilkyPix has a true 16-bit processing engine under the hood. The most popular professional photo editing application, Photoshop, surprisingly handles only up to 15 bits of the image data. Losing that 16th bit means that an entire HALF of the tonal information is ignored by Photoshop when the image file is opened and is subsequently discarded once it is saved. Considering the importance of the tonal information in creation of fine art images, I recommend using the full 16-bit power of the raw conversion process to create a full tonal base for the desired look of the Master image file while keeping an overall contrast of the image low and avoiding clipping by staying away from pure whites and blacks. The tonal and color adjustments in Photoshop should be applied only in adjustment layers.
Regards Paul.
One day I hope to be the person my dogs think I am.

Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2008
Dick Bowman Dick Bowman is offline
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/a
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Silkypix

I feel pretty positive about Silkypix in terms of results, but I'm a bit less enthused of their sales arm (Shortcut) who seem a bit casual about responding to queries (there's a forum, and there seem to be one or two "officialish" support people who are responsive - but Shortcut themselves seem to keep a low profile).

I'd probably splash the cash if I felt that the sales/support people were more responsive. When I first looked - a couple of years ago - Silkypix themselves were quite approachable. I can understand their wanting to have a sales/distribution agent, but I wonder whether they've made a good choice.
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2008
crimbo crimbo is offline
Full member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Shetland
Posts: 1,736
Thanks: 100
Thanked 149 Times in 130 Posts
Likes: 22
Liked 122 Times in 62 Posts
Re: Silkypix

one of the things that has always confused me is that the cameras only have 12-bit or 14-bit RAW capture.
That is then mapped to 15-bit or 16 bit and then we are viewing it in 8-bit
don't ask me to explain...I cant .... but it makes me confused over the difference between Silypix and PS
Reply With Quote
Old 3rd September 2008
Jim Ford Jim Ford is offline
Full member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Watford, Herts..
Posts: 8,133
Thanks: 439
Thanked 576 Times in 501 Posts
Likes: 2,553
Liked 1,598 Times in 1,019 Posts
Re: Silkypix

I don't think Photoshop users need exercise themselves too much over 15, rather than 16 bits. Jpeg users seem to do quite well on a meagre 8 bits!

Quoting Bruce Fraser on Photoshops 15 bits:

"One advantage of this approach is that it provides an unambiguous mid point between black and white, which is very useful in imaging operations such as blending modes, that a channel comprising 65,536 levels lacks."

I tried Silkypix once, but IIRC found the interface pretty wierd!

Reply With Quote

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Any downside to Silkypix? Dick Bowman Software 5 3rd August 2008 09:09 AM
E-420 now supported by Silkypix OlyPaul Software 0 10th May 2008 07:11 AM
Silkypix installation problem. Jim Ford Software 8 4th April 2008 03:56 PM
Silkypix Raw support for E3 andym Software 0 1st December 2007 12:30 PM

All times are GMT. The time now is 02:14 AM.

The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger