Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Micro Four Thirds > Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II The second Micro Four Thirds camera that offers phase detect focusing so you can use Four Thirds DSLR lenses normally as well a Micro Four Thirds lenses.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #31  
Old 20th December 2017
Bengeo Bengeo is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Herts
Posts: 687
Thanks: 82
Thanked 150 Times in 87 Posts
Likes: 323
Liked 335 Times in 117 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

Yes Brian. Just thought it might save someone here possibly spoiling their setup if using the 100-400mm. I'd like to try it with the 300mm f4 but I'm not going to take the risk until we know more as v1.3 is pretty good anyway. I am encouraged by the improved performance reports with Olympus lenses.
__________________
Andy
bengeo.com
Reply With Quote
  #32  
Old 20th December 2017
Keith-369 Keith-369 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: North West England
Posts: 440
Thanks: 5
Thanked 64 Times in 57 Posts
Likes: 138
Liked 182 Times in 103 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

If the new update is having an adverse effect when using the Panny 100-400 .... then surely it's about time Olympus got their act together and gave us their version of a long zoom.

At the moment, the lack of an Olympus version is forcing those who want a long zoom to go to Panasonic for such a lens.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Gwyver (21st December 2017)
  #33  
Old 20th December 2017
brian1208 brian1208 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dorset
Posts: 4,565
Thanks: 827
Thanked 929 Times in 742 Posts
Likes: 1,966
Liked 1,323 Times in 625 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

I did notice that another update is due early next year to make the mk2 compatible with the new 200f2.8, I'm probably dreaming but it would be nice if they got everything sorted in one go (maybe even dual IS and pro capture? )
Reply With Quote
  #34  
Old 20th December 2017
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 4,576
Thanks: 347
Thanked 1,013 Times in 770 Posts
Likes: 92
Liked 4,529 Times in 1,476 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

I just upgraded. Not really tried anything yet except point it around the house. Not noticing any difference at all yet.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #35  
Old 20th December 2017
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 8,158
Thanks: 520
Thanked 389 Times in 367 Posts
Likes: 3,767
Liked 1,800 Times in 930 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bengeo View Post
If you've got the Panasonic 100-400mm lens you might want to hold off doing this update as there might be a problem when using this lens.

This is being discussed on the E-M1 II Facebook page.

Gave my Pany 100-400mm a whirl this morning, having ugraded to V1.4 firmware.

No noticeable difference in performance. Works well still.............
__________________
My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Bengeo (21st December 2017)
  #36  
Old 20th December 2017
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 4,576
Thanks: 347
Thanked 1,013 Times in 770 Posts
Likes: 92
Liked 4,529 Times in 1,476 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

Prompted by postings over on DPR, I've been checking out CAF+tracking. With the 40-150 it actually seems to work now! Very snappy autofocus and in half decent light it seems to track the subject far better than I've ever seen tracking work before.

People on DPR are however pointing to poorer CAF with the 100-400, which isn't such good news if you have that lens.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pdk42 For This Useful Post:
brian1208 (20th December 2017), Graham from Wirral (21st December 2017)
The Following User Liked This Post:
brian1208 (20th December 2017)
  #37  
Old 20th December 2017
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 8,158
Thanks: 520
Thanked 389 Times in 367 Posts
Likes: 3,767
Liked 1,800 Times in 930 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

CAF+ Tracking was never good with the Pany100-400mm

Mj

Edited the CAF + Tracking
__________________
My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #38  
Old 20th December 2017
brian1208 brian1208 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dorset
Posts: 4,565
Thanks: 827
Thanked 929 Times in 742 Posts
Likes: 1,966
Liked 1,323 Times in 625 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

"CAF was never good with the Pany100-400mm"


I know that is the general view Martin but my experience is different, which is why CAF + tracking has been my standard setting when using the mk2 + 100-400 for all my water sport action work and most of my birding work so I am one who is disappointed with the change in both focus acquisition and tracking in this mode.


I'm hoping that the effect may be minimal in better light but so far after two days of testing in very poor light it doesn't look promising
Reply With Quote
  #39  
Old 20th December 2017
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 8,158
Thanks: 520
Thanked 389 Times in 367 Posts
Likes: 3,767
Liked 1,800 Times in 930 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

Quote:
Originally Posted by brian1208 View Post
"CAF was never good with the Pany100-400mm"


I know that is the general view Martin but my experience is different, which is why CAF + tracking has been my standard setting when using the mk2 + 100-400 for all my water sport action work and most of my birding work so I am one who is disappointed with the change in both focus acquisition and tracking in this mode.


I'm hoping that the effect may be minimal in better light but so far after two days of testing in very poor light it doesn't look promising
Might be the size of the subject. Tried tracking this morning on a couple of jets land at the airport. Tracking did not pick them up on neither 40-150mm nor the Pany 100-400mm. Jets were about a mile away I guess. But playing with flowers in the garden, both seemed to track Ok. Yet to try out flying birds..........

Mark j
__________________
My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #40  
Old 21st December 2017
brian1208 brian1208 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dorset
Posts: 4,565
Thanks: 827
Thanked 929 Times in 742 Posts
Likes: 1,966
Liked 1,323 Times in 625 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

I've just had an update from a couple of other users of the 100-400 on the mk2 post v1.4 which seem more positive when shooting in good light.


"I tried it today on fast moving birds and it is most definitely faster. I was able to track a fast flying duck on a clear dawn sky. The same conditions and shot it failed last week"


"Had my first backyard play with new FW and PL 100-400 and feels if anything a bit more "sticky" (better) for CAF to me. Tracked this pidgeon through trees and houses and got a few sharp ones... much like before."


So I look forward to seeing how this develops for others (we are stuck with miserable, dark skies for the next week or so by the look of it)


Thanks Mark, hmm, I'm seeing it consistently lock on to jets flying at vapour trail height (well, I was before v1.4 ) and birds occupying less than a tenth of the EVF area, as I said, I have no explanation why but after early problems one of the first firmware updates seemed to resolve any issues I was seeing with using CAF or CAF + tracking
Reply With Quote
  #41  
Old 23rd December 2017
GyRob GyRob is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Location: N.E.Lincs
Posts: 156
Thanks: 1
Thanked 22 Times in 17 Posts
Likes: 13
Liked 143 Times in 24 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

Well I just updated and cant see any difference in CAF it's still a bit hit and miss .
Rob.
Reply With Quote
  #42  
Old 23rd December 2017
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 4,278
Thanks: 270
Thanked 386 Times in 327 Posts
Likes: 1,436
Liked 982 Times in 556 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

It's so difficult to assess this sort of thing objectively that I'm currently fairly skeptical of what has been posted - by well-meaning people who genuinely believe what they've found, of course. Without blind testing it is unreliable, full stop.

So, there are so many variables, especially with CAF, that I recommend waiting before jumping to any conclusions if this is important to you!

I'm off to North Norfolk in a few days for 5 days birding (and landscape shooting), and I had thought about updating one body and leaving the other at v1.3 and choosing one or the other at random to see if I could find a difference, but in the end I just updated both and decided to worry about other things!

On the basis of 20' in the back garden I can confirm that I can find no glaring changes in tracking birds-in-flight or in % images in focus with the 300, plus or minus the 1.4!
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
http://www.microcontrast.com
Too much Oly gear.
Panasonic 12-35, 15. Samyang 7.5 fisheye. Laowa 7.5.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70.
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
brian1208 (23rd December 2017), Ross the fiddler (23rd December 2017)
  #43  
Old 23rd December 2017
brian1208 brian1208 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Dorset
Posts: 4,565
Thanks: 827
Thanked 929 Times in 742 Posts
Likes: 1,966
Liked 1,323 Times in 625 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

All one can do is record what is seen objectively and accurately, whether or not everyone see the same effect can be down to many variables


Over time shared experiences provide a data set, that's all


For example, I have yet to see many of the problems that others have experienced when using CAF + tracking (which is now my standard setting for the bulk of my work) but that in no way suggests that the experience of others is wrong.
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
drmarkf (23rd December 2017), MJ224 (23rd December 2017)
  #44  
Old 3rd January 2018
bigsambwfc bigsambwfc is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: banbury
Posts: 85
Thanks: 0
Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts
Likes: 23
Liked 83 Times in 30 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

been doing bif today with 100-400 lens on 1.4 update and I think it is better in caf but not much change in saf. I took some magpie in flight shots against a wooded dark background and out of about 10 shots 7 are good, this in not too good light using caf, bbf.there was a jay high up in a tree about 20% covered in branches saf could not pick it up, but could pick the nearest branch, so it is still an annoyance having to adjust or go mf.not tried caf-tr yet.
Reply With Quote
  #45  
Old 19th February 2018
CJJE's Avatar
CJJE CJJE is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Staffordshire, UK
Posts: 385
Thanks: 40
Thanked 88 Times in 50 Posts
Likes: 4
Liked 44 Times in 27 Posts
Re: Firmware Update

The 4/3 Rumors website has just said that two sources have confirmed that Olympus will release a new firmware update for the E-M1II on February 28.

One of the sources said that those could be some of the new features:
- It adds small focus points
- much improved pro capture
- improved CAF for video
- Image stabilization improved
- Video quality improvement

Not long to see now if they're right!
__________________
Chris

Black OM-D E-M1 MkII, Silver PEN-F, Black Lumix GX7, and too many lenses!
Reply With Quote
The Following 8 Users Say Thank You to CJJE For This Useful Post:
bassman (19th February 2018), Greytop (19th February 2018), Innit (19th February 2018), mack100 (19th February 2018), MJ224 (19th February 2018), Phill D (19th February 2018), Ross the fiddler (19th February 2018), Static (20th February 2018)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
brian1208 (19th February 2018), drmarkf (19th February 2018), Phill D (19th February 2018)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Pen-F firmware update Shaw Olympus Pen-F 0 10th December 2016 11:27 AM
One for a firmware update please Ian? DJMC Olympus OM-D E-M5 1 29th October 2012 11:48 AM
Don't update to E-M5 1.2 firmware for now. Ian Olympus OM-D E-M5 79 3rd October 2012 06:04 AM
HELP! E-1 firmware update with Win 7 StephenL Olympus E-1 30 28th June 2011 10:10 AM
Update of firmware... petrovich Software 3 21st December 2008 01:59 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 03:21 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger