Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Out of Focus area > The lounge

The lounge Relax, take a break from photo and camera talk - have a chat about something else for a change. Just keep it clean and polite!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 16th June 2017
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 10,079
Thanks: 333
Thanked 2,081 Times in 1,032 Posts
Likes: 543
Liked 937 Times in 456 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
Yes, as Ian pointed out, diffraction is your enemy at f8 on a u4/3 sensor. (It begs the question why the manufacturer provides smaller apertures knowing they're virtually unusable.)
I disagree that smaller apertures are unusable. Sometimes limiting exposure is an acceptable cost of some sharpness. It's also critical when you need adequate depth of field. And as we are learning from this thread, the size of the end result may not reveal the loss in resolution.

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 16th June 2017
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 3,413
Thanks: 324
Thanked 735 Times in 564 Posts
Likes: 47
Liked 2,924 Times in 1,014 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

I know we don't want this to descend into a slanging match - but really it's a useless thread. Comparisons across formats are always tricky, even when the tester uses careful process and posts their results for us all to see.

In this case we have someone who has created several similar threads, all containing outrageous statements with no real evidence or structured argument to defend them. I don't know why he's a member here or why he has a u43 system given the opinions expressed.

IMHO, close the thread now. Nothing of value will come from it.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Grumpy Hec (18th June 2017), Johnheatingman (16th June 2017), pault (16th June 2017), wornish (16th June 2017)
  #18  
Old 16th June 2017
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 10,079
Thanks: 333
Thanked 2,081 Times in 1,032 Posts
Likes: 543
Liked 937 Times in 456 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdk42 View Post
I know we don't want this to descend into a slanging match - but really it's a useless thread. Comparisons across formats are always tricky, even when the tester uses careful process and posts their results for us all to see.

In this case we have someone who has created several similar threads, all containing outrageous statements with no real evidence or structured argument to defend them. I don't know why he's a member here or why he has a u43 system given the opinions expressed.

IMHO, close the thread now. Nothing of value will come from it.
Paul, I understand where you are coming from but I'm not really in favour of closing threads. I have deleted threads in the past but closing a thread simply stifles things in my view. I feel the best thing is - if you don't like what is being said in a thread, then either make a considered contribution or leave it alone. I do respect your view assuming that you don't agree with this policy.
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 16th June 2017
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 3,413
Thanks: 324
Thanked 735 Times in 564 Posts
Likes: 47
Liked 2,924 Times in 1,014 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
Paul, I understand where you are coming from but I'm not really in favour of closing threads. I have deleted threads in the past but closing a thread simply stifles things in my view. I feel the best thing is - if you don't like what is being said in a thread, then either make a considered contribution or leave it alone. I do respect your view assuming that you don't agree with this policy.
I do agree actually Ian and I've deliberately not responded to the specifics of the "results". I guess the best approach is to keep my own counsel! I do like this forum though and would hate to see it go the way of dpreview and such like.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
drmarkf (18th June 2017), Johnheatingman (16th June 2017)
  #20  
Old 16th June 2017
Michael Sewell's Avatar
Michael Sewell Michael Sewell is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: Burnley
Posts: 317
Thanks: 18
Thanked 39 Times in 27 Posts
Likes: 80
Liked 179 Times in 78 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

In an effort to show a fair comparison between a D4 image and an E-M1 mk1 image, see if you can figure which is which. That said, I really don't mind which you prefer as both clients were more than happy with their images. One image was for the bridal brochure of an international hotel group, the other image was for a wedding. And no, I'm not telling you which was for whom.



Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
cliff (17th June 2017), drmarkf (18th June 2017), George Dorn (18th June 2017), Graham_of_Rainham (16th June 2017), Greytop (16th June 2017), Hemlockwood (16th June 2017), Innit (17th June 2017), Johnheatingman (16th June 2017), Naughty Nigel (18th June 2017), Otto (17th June 2017), pdk42 (17th June 2017), PeterBirder (16th June 2017), Phill D (17th June 2017), Ross the fiddler (17th June 2017), wornish (16th June 2017), Zuiko (16th June 2017)
  #21  
Old 16th June 2017
Johnheatingman's Avatar
Johnheatingman Johnheatingman is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NW-UK
Posts: 2,020
Thanks: 428
Thanked 266 Times in 204 Posts
Likes: 362
Liked 436 Times in 238 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ian View Post
Paul, I understand where you are coming from but I'm not really in favour of closing threads. I have deleted threads in the past but closing a thread simply stifles things in my view. I feel the best thing is - if you don't like what is being said in a thread, then either make a considered contribution or leave it alone. I do respect your view assuming that you don't agree with this policy.
Closing the thread, in my opinion would be a totally futile action as another will surely appear to replace it. We already have 2 threads active with similar topics started by the same member and several previous ones.

The actual threads and resulting discussion by the members are not the problem here. The real problem is the OP's purpose and intentions in posting them. I fully appreciate that Ian and the Admins. have to be seen to apply a measured degree of political correctness in these situations but surely as a Forum funded either wholly or in part by Olympus there comes a time when enough brand assassination is enough.

It only takes a quick look through the various comments and threads made by the OP to come to the conclusion his only purpose in being a member here is to create argument, cause offence and decry the Olympus name.

The real question is, do we need such a member ? The answer can only be decided by the forum Administrators.

John
__________________
Where ignorance is bliss .. tis folly to be wise - Thomas Gray
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Crazy Dave (17th June 2017), George Dorn (18th June 2017)
  #22  
Old 16th June 2017
wornish's Avatar
wornish wornish is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cheshire
Posts: 1,513
Thanks: 149
Thanked 149 Times in 114 Posts
Likes: 617
Liked 348 Times in 173 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Don't let one individual spoil what is a very friendly and useful forum.
It's obvious what they are trying to do, simply wind people up.
Please don't let this forum turn into "dpreview"
__________________
Dave
Reply With Quote
  #23  
Old 16th June 2017
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A Brit now living in Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,314
Thanks: 40
Thanked 660 Times in 623 Posts
Likes: 213
Liked 1,166 Times in 721 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

People, will you please stop feeding the troll. It only encourages their attention seeking behaviour.
__________________
It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

The Grumpy Snapper blog.
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
George Dorn (18th June 2017), Grumpy Hec (18th June 2017), wornish (16th June 2017)
  #24  
Old 16th June 2017
Ian's Avatar
Ian Ian is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Hemel Hempstead, Hertfordshire, UK
Posts: 10,079
Thanks: 333
Thanked 2,081 Times in 1,032 Posts
Likes: 543
Liked 937 Times in 456 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnheatingman View Post
Closing the thread, in my opinion would be a totally futile action as another will surely appear to replace it. We already have 2 threads active with similar topics started by the same member and several previous ones.

The actual threads and resulting discussion by the members are not the problem here. The real problem is the OP's purpose and intentions in posting them. I fully appreciate that Ian and the Admins. have to be seen to apply a measured degree of political correctness in these situations but surely as a Forum funded either wholly or in part by Olympus there comes a time when enough brand assassination is enough.

It only takes a quick look through the various comments and threads made by the OP to come to the conclusion his only purpose in being a member here is to create argument, cause offence and decry the Olympus name.

The real question is, do we need such a member ? The answer can only be decided by the forum Administrators.

John
We are no longer funded by Olympus.

Anyway, I don't feel this is doing bottom line harm to Olympus as the counter-arguments are very convincing.

What we all need to do is calm down and simply deal in carefully considered, respectful, responses based on facts and common sense.

Ian
__________________
Founder and editor of:
Olympus UK E-System User Group (http://e-group.uk.net)
Four Thirds User (http://fourthirds-user.com)
Digital Photography Now (http://dpnow.com)
Olympus camera, lens, and accessory hire (http://e-group.uk.net/hire)

Twitter: www.twitter.com/ian_burley
Flickr: www.flickr.com/photos/dpnow/
Pinterest: www.pinterest.com/ianburley/
NEW: My personal BLOG ianburley.com
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Zuiko (16th June 2017)
  #25  
Old 16th June 2017
Graham_of_Rainham's Avatar
Graham_of_Rainham Graham_of_Rainham is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rainham
Posts: 6,633
Thanks: 525
Thanked 793 Times in 599 Posts
Likes: 1,705
Liked 1,027 Times in 616 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Michael Sewell View Post
In an effort to show a fair comparison between a D4 image and an E-M1 mk1 images, see if you can figure which is which. That said, I really don't mind which you prefer as both clients were more than happy with their images. One image was for the bridal brochure of an international hotel group, the other image was for a wedding. And no, I'm not telling you which was for whom.



When the images are this good, who cares what was used to produce them.

When shooting food, does the question of the cooking utensils ever get mentioned. Imagine saying to the chefs "that's delicious, you must have a really expensive oven".

I love the detail in the dress. Excellent work.
__________________
Graham

We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Graham_of_Rainham For This Useful Post:
Michael Sewell (16th June 2017)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
MJ224 (18th June 2017), Zuiko (16th June 2017)
  #26  
Old 17th June 2017
Phill D's Avatar
Phill D Phill D is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 6,512
Thanks: 763
Thanked 974 Times in 903 Posts
Likes: 333
Liked 854 Times in 518 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Couldn't agree more Graham, Michael has posted some stunning images.
Hey just realised we have just installed a new oven in our kitchen so hopefully I can look forward to gourmet meals in the future
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Graham_of_Rainham (17th June 2017), Michael Sewell (17th June 2017)
  #27  
Old 17th June 2017
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 3,413
Thanks: 324
Thanked 735 Times in 564 Posts
Likes: 47
Liked 2,924 Times in 1,014 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phill D View Post
Couldn't agree more Graham, Michael has posted some stunning images.
Hey just realised we have just installed a new oven in our kitchen so hopefully I can look forward to gourmet meals in the future
We're getting a new oven soon too - really looking forward to it! I'll be pastry peeking and will write up my thoughts.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Michael Sewell (17th June 2017)
  #28  
Old 17th June 2017
Otto's Avatar
Otto Otto is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 991
Thanks: 56
Thanked 113 Times in 106 Posts
Likes: 289
Liked 189 Times in 131 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Graham_of_Rainham View Post
Imagine saying to the chefs "that's delicious, you must have a really expensive oven".
Bert Hardy is reputed to have said just that to the hostess of a dinner party who had complimented his work and said he must have a very good camera .
__________________
Regards
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 17th June 2017
Wreckdiver's Avatar
Wreckdiver Wreckdiver is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: From Liverpool, live in Chippenham, Wiltshire.
Posts: 1,551
Thanks: 67
Thanked 60 Times in 56 Posts
Likes: 63
Liked 43 Times in 24 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Just to slightly drift away from the main theme of this thread I find the comments Ian and others have made regarding the Diffraction issue very interesting. I have been aware of Diffraction but not really read into it. So I had a search and found this useful and informative site on the subject. Near the bottom is a calculator that gives some indication as the the limits of diffraction for the many camera systems.

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tut...hotography.htm

Steve
__________________
Old divers never die, they just go down on old wrecks
Take nothing but photographs, leave nothing but bubbles
My website
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wreckdiver For This Useful Post:
MJ224 (18th June 2017)
  #30  
Old 17th June 2017
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 3,614
Thanks: 401
Thanked 302 Times in 270 Posts
Likes: 467
Liked 967 Times in 586 Posts
Re: Two camera test.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Wreckdiver View Post
Just to slightly drift away from the main theme of this thread I find the comments Ian and others have made regarding the Diffraction issue very interesting. I have been aware of Diffraction but not really read into it. So I had a search and found this useful and informative site on the subject. Near the bottom is a calculator that gives some indication as the the limits of diffraction for the many camera systems.

http://www.cambridgeincolour.com/tut...hotography.htm

Steve
Also remember for a given aperture, diffraction is a function of wavelength. So if you see colour separation when you pixel peep you'll know why.
Have a look at this nice easy to understand explanation: https://physics.stackexchange.com/qu...ct-diffraction
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Wreckdiver (17th June 2017)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Three camera test. Pistnbroke Olympus OM-D E-M5 18 16th June 2017 09:01 PM
Oly Digital Camera Updater - 2.0 Saves camera settings! Ross the fiddler Software 6 4th November 2016 10:29 AM
test pic ... IanB Foto Fair 9 3rd October 2015 08:58 AM
New Olympus Camera test...I've got a brand new Combine Harvester(image heavy) Wee man Foto Fair 15 31st August 2013 04:32 PM
Test drive an E-System camera (UK news) Ian Announcements 8 20th September 2008 08:13 AM


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:43 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2017, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger