Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Micro Four Thirds > Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II

Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II The second Micro Four Thirds camera that offers phase detect focusing so you can use Four Thirds DSLR lenses normally as well a Micro Four Thirds lenses.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 28th April 2017
Walti Walti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 2,398
Thanks: 259
Thanked 144 Times in 129 Posts
Likes: 194
Liked 1,079 Times in 433 Posts
Diffraction calculation

Trying to calculate the "ideal" aperture for the MKii...

Looks like f7.1 is the ideal from the calculations and research I've done... does this sound correct?

Paul
__________________

Some Olympus stuff
I didn't get where I am today...
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 28th April 2017
Beagletorque's Avatar
Beagletorque Beagletorque is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Extreme South Midlands, England
Posts: 5,845
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 732 Times in 670 Posts
Likes: 1,648
Liked 3,085 Times in 1,178 Posts
Re: Diffraction calculation

Ideal for what though?

Sent from my Nexus 5 using Tapatalk
__________________
Missed a Cuba Post? Catch up here!
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 28th April 2017
Walti Walti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 2,398
Thanks: 259
Thanked 144 Times in 129 Posts
Likes: 194
Liked 1,079 Times in 433 Posts
Re: Diffraction calculation

Balancing the DoF vs diffraction to get the best out of the system, especially for wildlife photography...

However the balance of diffraction vs noise is another consideration owing to the UK weather and the need to up the ISO a bit to get a decent shutter speed at times!

Just been dipping my toes into architectural photography and am struggling to get the best at times, though the high resolution mode and a tripod may be a better way forwards on occasion.
__________________

Some Olympus stuff
I didn't get where I am today...
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 28th April 2017
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4,904
Thanks: 516
Thanked 365 Times in 326 Posts
Likes: 625
Liked 1,473 Times in 892 Posts
Re: Diffraction calculation

Read this Walti

https://www.lensrentals.com/blog/201...atters-part-2/
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ricoh For This Useful Post:
Walti (28th April 2017)
The Following User Liked This Post:
Walti (28th April 2017)
  #5  
Old 28th April 2017
Beagletorque's Avatar
Beagletorque Beagletorque is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Extreme South Midlands, England
Posts: 5,845
Thanks: 1,019
Thanked 732 Times in 670 Posts
Likes: 1,648
Liked 3,085 Times in 1,178 Posts
Re: Diffraction calculation

Download a dof calculator for your phone, very handy to check dof and hyperfocals. In terms of diffraction best keep to as low an f stop as possible, assuming your glass is good and the dof is acceptable.
__________________
Missed a Cuba Post? Catch up here!
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 28th April 2017
Petrochemist Petrochemist is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: N Essex
Posts: 645
Thanks: 32
Thanked 71 Times in 65 Posts
Likes: 185
Liked 107 Times in 79 Posts
Re: Diffraction calculation

The only relevant diffraction calculation I know is from the Rayleigh diffraction limit giving:
'max resolution on sensor = 2.44* wavelength * f number'

I assume the units for resolution math those of the wavelength, as f number is dimensionless.

I've seen loads of posts about diffraction limited optics etc which don't consider that red light has a much worse problem than the blue.

I don't see how a calculation of any sort can give a optimum aperture. The ideal DOF depends so much on the subject, in some cases a little diffractive softening is worth it for increased DOF, in many others adequate DOF is achievable when diffraction is having no significant affect on the image.

There are other effects changing the image with aperture. Many forms of aberration are reduced by using smaller apertures. The data required to calculate the effects of these are not AFAIK available to photographers. If you're after the ultimate aperture for exhaustive focus stacking (where DOF is not an issue) trial & error is likely to be the best approach. Most lenses are reckoned to be at their best ~2 stops closed down, but the actual value can vary on a lens by lens basis.
__________________
Mike
Compulsive photographic Dabbler.
Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 28th April 2017
RobEW RobEW is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Nottingham
Posts: 1,276
Thanks: 127
Thanked 39 Times in 37 Posts
Likes: 737
Liked 107 Times in 73 Posts
Re: Diffraction calculation

According to the article by Roger Cicala which Ricoh posted a link to, if I understand it, the f stop at which diffraction begins to be problematical is dependent on the sensor characteristics (sensor size and pixel size) alone, and doesn't vary depending on what lens you attach.

If we take the approach Cicala describes based on tables 2 & 3, then "a four thirds sensor is becoming diffraction limited by f/11". If we take the approach based on pixel pitch (his table 4) then we would adopt a more conservative limit of f/8 (for a sensor with pixel pitch of 3.8 micrometres)

Of course there are other constraints and trade-offs which may make us want a narrow aperture in some circumstances.

Can I add a question here? How would I know, looking at a photo, if diffraction was compromising the quality? Is it just a rather subjective fuzziness, or is there something specific I can look for by pixel peeping?
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 28th April 2017
Walti Walti is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Cambridge
Posts: 2,398
Thanks: 259
Thanked 144 Times in 129 Posts
Likes: 194
Liked 1,079 Times in 433 Posts
Re: Diffraction calculation

Quote:
Originally Posted by RobEW View Post
According to the article by Roger Cicala which Ricoh posted a link to, if I understand it, the f stop at which diffraction begins to be problematical is dependent on the sensor characteristics (sensor size and pixel size) alone, and doesn't vary depending on what lens you attach.

If we take the approach Cicala describes based on tables 2 & 3, then "a four thirds sensor is becoming diffraction limited by f/11". If we take the approach based on pixel pitch (his table 4) then we would adopt a more conservative limit of f/8 (for a sensor with pixel pitch of 3.8 micrometres)

Of course there are other constraints and trade-offs which may make us want a narrow aperture in some circumstances.

Can I add a question here? How would I know, looking at a photo, if diffraction was compromising the quality? Is it just a rather subjective fuzziness, or is there something specific I can look for by pixel peeping?
I'm trying to understand it myself, as I've noticed that the photos away from wide open tend to not only be better in focus due to the increased DoF but also exposed slightly better (I'm unsure whether this is my imagination or not!)

So when trying to photograph birds I seem to have defaulted by accident to 1/1000s and f8 with the autoISO taking care of the exposure, which seems at the moment to be the best compromise, but I thought I'd look at the defraction limits of the camera to see where this makes a difference, and dependant on how you calculate it (or which website you look at) then the f8 looks to have potential issues f7.1 doesn't, so I thought I'd try a few and see if I can actually see any difference!

I think there's more issues than the camera settings at the moment, the guy holding the camera seems to be the biggest obstacle to excellent photos - it still feels like luck if I get a reasonable shot!
__________________

Some Olympus stuff
I didn't get where I am today...
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 28th April 2017
Growltiger Growltiger is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 200
Thanks: 1
Thanked 58 Times in 43 Posts
Likes: 6
Liked 35 Times in 24 Posts
Re: Diffraction calculation

I have done tests myself, which in very simple terms gave the following rule of thumb results:
f/16 Poor, loss of detail, never use unless desperate for extra DOF.
f/11 Acceptable, a little loss of detail. Can use for macro to get more DOF.
f/8 Very good indeed. Almost the same as f/5.6
f/5.6 The best, no loss of detail.

So I'm very happy to use f/8 or wider, I use f/11 for some macro shots, and never use f/16.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diffraction?? IainMacD Looking for improvement 18 30th September 2014 11:25 PM
Diffraction explained Kiwi Paul Tutorials, Informative & Classic threads 3 9th May 2012 09:43 AM
Sensor Sizes and Diffraction padgreen Micro Four Thirds 14 19th March 2012 11:12 PM
Diffraction effect? Swordfish Foto Fair 5 3rd August 2011 05:58 PM
Ian's DP Now Article on Diffraction padgreen Camera conference 5 6th February 2011 07:09 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 04:39 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger