Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference

Camera conference General and model-specific E-System camera chat.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2nd February 2011
padgreen's Avatar
padgreen padgreen is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: London
Posts: 148
Thanks: 4
Thanked 6 Times in 5 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 0 Times in 0 Posts
Ian's DP Now Article on Diffraction

Hi

Has anyone read Ian's article on diffraction over on DP Now? I did and I was shocked! Like most people, I assume, I have heard of diffraction and knew that past a certain aperture images would become progressively less sharp due to softness caused by diffraction. On 4/3rd's I've always assumed that this would be at f11 or above and that using f8 would be OK. For this reason, I hardly ever use f11.

Ian's article shows crops from an E5 with a 35-100 f2 lens. It clearly shows that even at f8, there is some softening due to diffraction. That was a surprise. At f11 the softening is clearly visible.

However, what shocked me the most was the table at the bottom of the article that gave the diffraction limit for different sensors with varying pixel counts. What shocked me was the suggestion that for a 16 MP 4/3rd sensor, diffraction would kick in not at f8 but at f5.6.

I'm wondering whether this is the reason why Olympus haven't gone past 12 MP on 4/3rd's? I also wonder where it leaves Panasonic's 16 MP sensor?

I also noted that on a full frame 12 MP camera, diffraction kicks on at f13 and f11 on a 24 MP camera.

Has anyone else read the article?. If so, what do you think? Read it here:

http://dpnow.com/7644.html
__________________
Cheers

Padgreen
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to padgreen For This Useful Post:
Kiwi Paul (2nd February 2011)
  #2  
Old 2nd February 2011
Kiwi Paul's Avatar
Kiwi Paul Kiwi Paul is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Aberdeen
Posts: 2,539
Thanks: 310
Thanked 249 Times in 195 Posts
Likes: 372
Liked 431 Times in 186 Posts
Re: Ian's DP Now Article on Diffraction

Yes I read it too, it was interesting. Certainly having a diffraction starting at f5.6 on 4/3 with a 16Mp sensor is a limitation although that still corresponds to an equivalent DOF as f11 on full frame so it's not as bad as it sounds but may well be why Oly has decided to stick to 12Mp.
I think in real terms using anything up to f9.5 is not a concern, I use f9.5 often when photographing landscapes where I want max DOF, the photos are sharp and crisp.

Paul
__________________
View my online album.
Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd February 2011
David M's Avatar
David M David M is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: A Brit now living in Ontario, Canada.
Posts: 6,603
Thanks: 41
Thanked 683 Times in 645 Posts
Likes: 257
Liked 1,294 Times in 792 Posts
Re: Ian's DP Now Article on Diffraction

There's already a thread discussing the article;

http://e-group.uk.net/forum/showthread.php?t=12859
__________________
It's the image that's important, not the tools used to make it.

The Grumpy Snapper blog or follow me on Instagram.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 3rd February 2011
David Morison's Avatar
David Morison David Morison is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fulbeck, Lincolnshire
Posts: 3,507
Thanks: 71
Thanked 591 Times in 475 Posts
Likes: 48
Liked 298 Times in 175 Posts
Re: Ian's DP Now Article on Diffraction

I think there is a danger of getting to hung up with numbers and pixels. It must depend on what you need from your subject, how much you want to crop/enlarge and whether technical or artistic factors are to prevail. I took this image on a Leica 14-150mm @14mm with an aperture of f20 to gain max DoF. If there is any loss of sharpness due to diffraction then I hadn't noticed it and it would not anyhow detract from the finished picture for me. I have printed this to A3 without concern. (appologies image posted before)





David
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 3rd February 2011
Jim Ford Jim Ford is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Watford, Herts..
Posts: 5,562
Thanks: 244
Thanked 427 Times in 364 Posts
Likes: 1,482
Liked 849 Times in 557 Posts
Re: Ian's DP Now Article on Diffraction

Quote:
Originally Posted by padgreen View Post
Has anyone else read the article?. If so, what do you think? Read it here:

http://dpnow.com/7644.html
Hmm, is that moire I see in the window net curtains? Moire has been reported on E5s because of the 'weaker' anti-alias filter.

Jim
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 6th February 2011
Internaut Internaut is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 1,857
Thanks: 264
Thanked 201 Times in 185 Posts
Likes: 988
Liked 320 Times in 153 Posts
Re: Ian's DP Now Article on Diffraction

I think the issue might be a bit overrated. However, we shouldn't forget how equivalence works for us. F11 is the same for us as F22 on full frame so we're already getting plenty of depth of field at that point (and the image should respond well to sharpening if the effect of diffraction is visible), especially if shooting with a wider focal length.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Diffraction limits to aperture settings Ian Announcements 26 29th January 2011 12:44 AM
Economist article mentions MFT Who's_E The lounge 0 11th March 2010 07:50 PM
Ian's new prize for us? KEITHBD Foto Fair 7 29th November 2008 08:05 PM
New E30 article from 4/3 Photo Forum. dennisg Olympus E-520 0 5th November 2008 10:15 PM
Detailed article on the New Olympus E30 dennisg Olympus E-520 0 5th November 2008 09:42 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:24 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger