Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference

Camera conference General and model-specific E-System camera chat.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Internaut Internaut is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,379
Thanks: 286
Thanked 243 Times in 222 Posts
Likes: 1,299
Liked 461 Times in 216 Posts
And another argument for smaller sensor

And also a more general discussion of trade offs, by Ming Thein:

https://blog.mingthein.com/2019/02/2...always-better/

Take away: given the correct lens (ideally stabilised to take advantage of dual stabilisation), an E-M1 mk II is probably going to produce more usable files, in low light, than my A7II. Of course, this doesn’t take into account that the bigger sensor is better for freezing action.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Tram Tram is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 205
Thanks: 10
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Likes: 16
Liked 85 Times in 51 Posts
Re: And another argument for smaller sensor

Why is it so important to keep on trying to justify the small m4/3 sensor?
Seems to be a big inferiority complex thing going on.
__________________
Nationalism is power hunger tempered by self-deception
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
cedge (2 Weeks Ago), Jim Ford (4 Weeks Ago), Ricoh (4 Weeks Ago)
  #3  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Internaut Internaut is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Manchester
Posts: 2,379
Thanks: 286
Thanked 243 Times in 222 Posts
Likes: 1,299
Liked 461 Times in 216 Posts
Re: And another argument for smaller sensor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Tram View Post
Why is it so important to keep on trying to justify the small m4/3 sensor?
Seems to be a big inferiority complex thing going on.
I assumed shutter bugs would like to read a well written, cogent and relatively unbiased essay on the trade offs of format. Clearly I was wrong.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Tram Tram is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Location: United Kingdom
Posts: 205
Thanks: 10
Thanked 18 Times in 16 Posts
Likes: 16
Liked 85 Times in 51 Posts
Re: And another argument for smaller sensor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Internaut View Post
I assumed shutter bugs would like to read a well written, cogent and relatively unbiased essay on the trade offs of format. Clearly I was wrong.
Don't take it so personally, it was a rhetorical question and not aimed at anyone in particular.

Just seems to be a big or actually smaller thing to keep defending.
Don't notice it from those with APS-C format cameras, as a new'ish user just seems a bit strange
__________________
Nationalism is power hunger tempered by self-deception
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Graham_of_Rainham's Avatar
Graham_of_Rainham Graham_of_Rainham is online now
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Rainham
Posts: 7,897
Thanks: 629
Thanked 916 Times in 708 Posts
Likes: 2,185
Liked 1,522 Times in 865 Posts
Re: And another argument for smaller sensor

I judge lots of photographic competitions and in response to this:

https://www.duford.com/2019/02/the-p...-qdiIx0N1W3FQY

I wrote the following:

"I am seeing more and more very good pictures taken by people using their phone cameras, drones and even some scanned from slide film / negatives...

Only the images on the screen or on paper count for anything. How they are made is completely irrelevant as once post processing, compression for projection or manipulation for printing, has been done, there is nothing left of those “precious pixels” that the peepers keep banging on about..."


I was quite pleased with the reply it got from one person on FaceBook:

"THIS!! It’s a point that few — often even workshop instructors — fail to point out."

We seem to have become more interested in all the peripheral aspects of photography at the expense of the picture itself.
__________________
Graham

We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy...
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Internaut (4 Weeks Ago), MJ224 (4 Weeks Ago), Phill D (4 Weeks Ago), Ross the fiddler (4 Weeks Ago)
  #6  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Otto's Avatar
Otto Otto is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 2,631
Thanks: 85
Thanked 231 Times in 204 Posts
Likes: 882
Liked 756 Times in 487 Posts
Re: And another argument for smaller sensor

That was true in the film and darkroom days too. Camera Club members were always more obsessed with the equipment than the images. I remember one visiting FRPS saying in a lecture that his photography really improved when he started aiming for the lowest marks from the judge!
__________________
Regards
Richard
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Otto For This Useful Post:
MJ224 (4 Weeks Ago)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Bruce Clarke (3 Weeks Ago), Graham_of_Rainham (4 Weeks Ago), Internaut (4 Weeks Ago), MJ224 (4 Weeks Ago), OM USer (4 Weeks Ago), Phill D (4 Weeks Ago)
  #7  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 5,538
Thanks: 580
Thanked 392 Times in 350 Posts
Likes: 765
Liked 1,775 Times in 1,066 Posts
Re: And another argument for smaller sensor

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto View Post
That was true in the film and darkroom days too. Camera Club members were always more obsessed with the equipment than the images. I remember one visiting FRPS saying in a lecture that his photography really improved when he started aiming for the lowest marks from the judge!
Although film and darkroom camera clubs are all but gone, there's is an online community on Twitter, fortunately. It is exceedingly rare for anyone to comment on camera gear, apart from how a particular lens renders, but that's only occasionally. The focus (pun) primarily is on the image and secondary on the emulsion / processing. It's refreshing not to read about MPs, image stacking etc etc.
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
drmarkf (3 Weeks Ago)
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Small sensor/large sensor....IS spinoff. Dave in Wales General photography discussion 1 12th February 2019 06:18 PM
The Small Sensor Argument Internaut Camera conference 5 5th February 2019 01:38 PM
Reasons to like a smaller sensor, and less pixels... Ricoh The lounge 3 23rd April 2017 06:43 AM
Smaller scale Greytop Foto Fair 16 18th July 2014 08:08 AM
Smaller but no less impresive. NSS Foto Fair 1 2nd October 2011 04:31 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 05:48 PM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger