Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > General photography discussion

General photography discussion Please look for a specific board to start your thread but if you can't find an appropriate one, post it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #16  
Old 9th July 2018
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 8,069
Thanks: 510
Thanked 387 Times in 365 Posts
Likes: 3,730
Liked 1,769 Times in 913 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Phill D View Post
Yep I agree with that too Mark, that Panny lens is on my potential shopping list unless Oly do bring one out. Interesting comment actually I only thought it was the pro capture L setting that wasn't compatible are there more issues?
Won't do the focus Stacking, although it does Bracketing. But that's a function of the body rather than the lens. With bracketing you can bracket very many shots, but need computer power to do the stacking. I am lazy, and like to stack at the time of the photo...

Mark j
__________________
My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #17  
Old 9th July 2018
MikeOxon MikeOxon is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: oxford
Posts: 278
Thanks: 26
Thanked 53 Times in 47 Posts
Likes: 31
Liked 92 Times in 63 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ224 View Post
Won't do the focus Stacking, although it does Bracketing. But that's a function of the body rather than the lens. With bracketing you can bracket very many shots, but need computer power to do the stacking. I am lazy, and like to stack at the time of the photo...
Quite a few Oly lenses won't do focus stacking either. I tend to find 8 steps rather too few, so am moving towards more steps followed by computer stacking. Perhaps Olympus could add more stacking steps with a firmware update?
__________________
Mike
visit my Natural History Photos website:
http://home.btconnect.com/mike.flemming/
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Crazy Dave (10th July 2018)
  #18  
Old 9th July 2018
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4,926
Thanks: 519
Thanked 365 Times in 326 Posts
Likes: 647
Liked 1,479 Times in 895 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

I think it was 'Uncle' Ken Rockwell who said shoot 'real' RAW. Sounds good to me!
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #19  
Old 9th July 2018
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 4,575
Thanks: 347
Thanked 1,013 Times in 770 Posts
Likes: 92
Liked 4,528 Times in 1,475 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

For what it's worth, I think Hogan's right. There's no good technological reason why m43 should be languishing at 16 or 20 Mp. The Sony 1" BSI sensors (RX100 et al) are at 20Mp but have an area approx 55% of m43. The same tech on a m43-sized sensor would give us approx 36Mp. That would be nice . And before someone says that more Mp means more noise, I'll just add a few points:

- The RX100 is scarcely any worse than m43. The same pixel density, with the same per-pixel noise, but scaled up to a 36Mp m43 sensor would mean equivalent enlargements would show notably less noise than today's m43 sensors.

- The 42Mp A7Rii delivers very similar image-level noise on real-world enlargements as the 12Mp A7Sii.

Truth be known, progress in m43 sensors since the EM5 of 2012 has been very slow. I personally would really like a significant improvement in m43 sensor performance. Can I make decent images with what I have today? - yes, I think so. Does the overall m43 system today offer things that other systems don't - yes, but you have to take a detailed look to realise it. Does m43 look competitive against other systems - I think increasingly less so; which is the point Hogan is making.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to pdk42 For This Useful Post:
Barr1e (10th July 2018)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Barr1e (10th July 2018), Bengeo (11th July 2018), griffljg (11th July 2018), The Technician (10th July 2018)
  #20  
Old 10th July 2018
Phill D's Avatar
Phill D Phill D is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Derbyshire
Posts: 7,999
Thanks: 880
Thanked 1,177 Times in 1,094 Posts
Likes: 589
Liked 1,461 Times in 761 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdk42 View Post
- The RX100 is scarcely any worse than m43. The same pixel density, with the same per-pixel noise, but scaled up to a 36Mp m43 sensor would mean equivalent enlargements would show notably less noise than today's m43 sensors.
Interesting Paul. If what you say would translate into say a 30Mp sensor with less noise than todays sensor then that sounds like the way to go. If it mean's even slightly more noise though then it would be a disaster in sales/marketing terms. I suspect the slower development in m4/3s sensors probably has a lot to do with the fact that Sony doesn't use that size.
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
MJ224 (10th July 2018)
  #21  
Old 10th July 2018
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 8,069
Thanks: 510
Thanked 387 Times in 365 Posts
Likes: 3,730
Liked 1,769 Times in 913 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Bigger and bigger files...…………..Unsure of the optimum, but I was always very pleased with my Pentax Ist 6Mp...…..But of course I could not do half as much cropping with that size.....My present 20Mp seems PDG....How far do we go. I guess progress in 10 years time might have an almost infinite sensor, things we dare not dream about...………….
__________________
My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #22  
Old 10th July 2018
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 4,926
Thanks: 519
Thanked 365 Times in 326 Posts
Likes: 647
Liked 1,479 Times in 895 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ224 View Post
Bigger and bigger files...…………..Unsure of the optimum, but I was always very pleased with my Pentax Ist 6Mp...…..But of course I could not do half as much cropping with that size.....My present 20Mp seems PDG....How far do we go. I guess progress in 10 years time might have an almost infinite sensor, things we dare not dream about...………….
You should crop with your feet, to mis-quote Ernst Haas, but the same sentiment non the less.
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
IPWheatley (11th July 2018)
  #23  
Old 10th July 2018
MJ224's Avatar
MJ224 MJ224 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Carmarthenshire
Posts: 8,069
Thanks: 510
Thanked 387 Times in 365 Posts
Likes: 3,730
Liked 1,769 Times in 913 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
You should crop with your feet, to mis-quote Ernst Haas, but the same sentiment non the less.
Yes understand your drift, but my blackbird does not, and the moon definitely has cloth ears...………..
__________________
My Sailing Page

My Flickr
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
angelpaaul (10th July 2018), drmarkf (11th July 2018), George Dorn (11th July 2018), Zuiko (11th July 2018)
  #24  
Old 10th July 2018
angelpaaul's Avatar
angelpaaul angelpaaul is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Wirral
Posts: 387
Thanks: 40
Thanked 21 Times in 20 Posts
Likes: 42
Liked 39 Times in 25 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Here we go - 'My camera has more pixels than yours'. Didn't we have this years ago when we used film? 'My Canon is better than your Nikon', '35mm!!, medium format is far superior', etc..... I've used many different systems and makes over the years, bought with a specific job in mind. Medium format for weddings, 35mm for when I was hill walking, compacts for a 'carry everywhere' camera and so on. When the bride and groom were looking at their wedding photos, they never asked what camera or film did I use, the results said it all. I use olympus m43 and it suits me just fine. In fact, if people bought a camera they needed and not wanted, there'd be a lot more compacts around.
__________________
Regards - Paul
Reply With Quote
  #25  
Old 10th July 2018
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 4,575
Thanks: 347
Thanked 1,013 Times in 770 Posts
Likes: 92
Liked 4,528 Times in 1,475 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Quote:
Originally Posted by angelpaaul View Post
Here we go - 'My camera has more pixels than yours'. Didn't we have this years ago when we used film? 'My Canon is better than your Nikon', '35mm!!, medium format is far superior', etc..... I've used many different systems and makes over the years, bought with a specific job in mind. Medium format for weddings, 35mm for when I was hill walking, compacts for a 'carry everywhere' camera and so on. When the bride and groom were looking at their wedding photos, they never asked what camera or film did I use, the results said it all. I use olympus m43 and it suits me just fine. In fact, if people bought a camera they needed and not wanted, there'd be a lot more compacts around.
I sort of agree Paul - but cameras are not sold because they're "adequate"; they're sold because they are competitive with alternative offerings. It's a ratchet and it's Darwinian. That's the way the Western World works!
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #26  
Old 10th July 2018
Pistnbroke's Avatar
Pistnbroke Pistnbroke is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: UK
Posts: 180
Thanks: 28
Thanked 25 Times in 19 Posts
Likes: 20
Liked 24 Times in 17 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

I think PDK 42 makes realistic comments but I do notice that many move to 4/3 as they get older and want smaller gear . I go that way myself using the larger Nikons when the punter pays but using the oly when I am relaxing.
__________________
The Master Masons....Nikon D810 x 2 + 28-300 x 2,D 800 with Samy 14mm f2.8 D7100, D7200 with 18-140, and 24-85 FX, Tamy 100-400 + Nikon 200-500mm
The apprentice..... Olympus OMD M5 Gripped + 14-42 R ,40-150 R,15mm F8 body cap lens.
Reply With Quote
  #27  
Old 10th July 2018
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 4,575
Thanks: 347
Thanked 1,013 Times in 770 Posts
Likes: 92
Liked 4,528 Times in 1,475 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Pistnbroke - I agree! I think the benefits of m43 tend to become apparent to experienced photographers who understand a few important points:

- They understand that ultimate image IQ is not the only parameter when comparing camera systems. If their m43 cameras deliver "very very good" IQ, then that's good enough for nearly all of what they do. It's the image that matters.

- They value the wider features of the camera system as a whole. They value compactness, a huge range of excellent lenses, class-leading image stabilisation, superb feature set, and excellent support from two active and innovative manufacturers.

- They have the experience and skills to work around what IQ limitations remain. This could be knowing how to use image stabilisation well, how to stack images, or how to expose and process raw files properly.

- They appreciate that the ergonomics and usability of a camera is a huge part of making them WANT to take images. They know that big and heavy kit tends to get left on the shelf, and that fancy cameras with great IQ lose their appeal if the usability and ownership experience isn't right.

However, relative newcomers find these arguments too subtle and not readily understood since they are hard to measure objectively and their true value needs experience to properly appreciate.

Olympus and Panasonic need to attract these photographers and unfortunately that means they need to keep up in the sensor race since that measure is what is easily marketed and what newbies will look to when they are comparing systems.

Truth be known, the four thirds system was dead by 2012. The E-M5 changed the game and size was only a part of that. The Sony 16Mp sensor lifted mage quality to the equal or better of APS-C at the time. But there has been too little evolution since then. All the subsequent 16Mp sensors add essentially nothing to the E-M5's raw handling. The 20Mp sensors add a little - but it's marginal. I personally think this IS a big challenge for Olympus and Panasonic - which is Hogan's point.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
griffljg (11th July 2018), MJ224 (11th July 2018), Ross the fiddler (11th July 2018), The Technician (11th July 2018)
  #28  
Old 10th July 2018
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 4,278
Thanks: 270
Thanked 386 Times in 327 Posts
Likes: 1,436
Liked 982 Times in 556 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Quote:
Originally Posted by Pistnbroke View Post
Interesting points.

http://www.dslrbodies.com/newsviews/...try-point.html

My M5 with the 15mm is doing a great job
Hogan’s lost the plot. Zero facts quoted in that article, which is entirely based on preconceived prejudice.

It’s a shame, because 8 years ago he wrote and thought well for Nikon owners.
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
http://www.microcontrast.com
Too much Oly gear.
Panasonic 12-35, 15. Samyang 7.5 fisheye. Laowa 7.5.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70.
Reply With Quote
  #29  
Old 10th July 2018
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 4,575
Thanks: 347
Thanked 1,013 Times in 770 Posts
Likes: 92
Liked 4,528 Times in 1,475 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Quote:
Originally Posted by drmarkf View Post
Hogan’s lost the plot. Zero facts quoted in that article, which is entirely based on preconceived prejudice.
That's true Mark - but his prejudice is reflecting a wider prejudice. And that's not an issue that facts or reason can easily counter.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #30  
Old 11th July 2018
shenstone's Avatar
shenstone shenstone is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Cardiff
Posts: 2,906
Thanks: 98
Thanked 240 Times in 180 Posts
Likes: 206
Liked 367 Times in 203 Posts
Re: Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3

Quote:
as 24mp full frame is enough for a two-page magazine spread, even at high ISO values.
Sadly he clearly does not know publishing as much as he thinks he does or the 12Mp image I took with my E-30 would not have been able to be used as a 2 page spread in a book would it!


It's good that people comment to correct misunderstandings like his here because he does not permit comments - at least if people see this thread they can see that all he has offered is an opinion - not a fact at all

Regards
Andy
__________________
My Kit (OK I'm a hoarder...)
4/3 E500, E510, E30 + 35macro, 50macro, 7-14, 11-22, 14-45 (x2), 14-54, 40-150 (both types), 50-200, 70-300, 50-500,
m 4/3 EM1MkII + 60 macro, 12-100 Pro
FL20, FL36 x2 , FL50, cactus slaves etc.
The Boss (Mrs Shenstone) E620, EM10-II, 14-41Ez, 40-150R, 9 cap and whatever she can nick from me when she wants it

My places
http://www.shenstone.me.uk
http://landroverkaty.blogspot.com/
https://vimeo.com/shenstone
http://cardiffnaturalists.org.uk/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thom Hogan review of E-M1ii pdk42 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II 6 21st August 2017 11:27 AM
For sale Olympus OM2 KIT, Olympus Bag L & Book Olympus OM-System EdR For sale or wanted small ads 3 22nd August 2013 02:02 PM
Olympus UK event: Olympus photographic experience at the Circus[/B] Southend-on-Sea, 08 July 2013 – Four Thirds User Articles from FourThirds-User.com 0 8th July 2013 08:50 AM
Thom Hogan on the future of Olympus. Wally The lounge 2 14th February 2011 08:20 PM
Olympus prediction from Thom Hogan ardvorlich The lounge 0 13th November 2010 07:05 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:45 PM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger