Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Out of Focus area > The lounge

The lounge Relax, take a break from photo and camera talk - have a chat about something else for a change. Just keep it clean and polite!

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 25th July 2010
Kiwi Paul
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Weight and size of camera gear.

How many folk find the size and weight of camera gear to be an issue?

Personally I'm not bothered at all, I happily carry the E3 with the 7-14, 14-35 or 35-100. I have 5 camera bags that each have their own purpose and enable me to carry any combination of camera and lenses from the E3 with 1 lens to everything.
My favourite combo is the Lowepro Slingshot 100 bag with the E3, 14-35 and 7-14, I don't find it heavy or obtrusive at all, access and changing lenses is easy.

I like the ergonomics of the E3 and wouldn't want to sacrifice that for say m4/3's gear.

Paul
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 25th July 2010
Who's_E's Avatar
Who's_E Who's_E is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: London
Posts: 612
Thanks: 1
Thanked 24 Times in 23 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 1 Post
Re: Weight and size of camera gear.

Paul,

With you on the weight: The more weight, the more exercise I get I don't like the way the Slingshot sits on my shoulder, though.

I have three bags - Lowepro trekker for (storing) everything, Lowepro Rezo for the 520 + 14-42, and a Tamrac shoulder bag with three pockets. I usually carry the shoulder bag, alone or inside whatever daysack I have, with a selection of lenses that I think I will need.

Shoulder bag is trip specific:

Wildlife/Sport: E3 + 50-200, EC-14, beanbag, Blower/Batteries/Cards etc

Weekend/holiday: E3 or 520, 12-60, maybe 8mm or EC-14, beanbag, filters, BBC etc, Ixus 60

Macro: E3 + macro lens/12-60, FL-50R, BBC etc.


The Rezo is for really space limited/unlikely photo opportunities and will have the E520 + 14-42mm/8mm and I will have a circular polariser, lenspen and a charger/spare battery. But it does take a lot to make me leave the 12-60 behind.

I only sacrifice the image quality of my SLR when I am running / mountain cycling / some other exertion because I don't want to damage them with vibrations or shock. I will usually carry the Canon Ixus in these situations as it can do almost everything but with lots less weight.

Nick
__________________
Bodies: E3, E-P1
Lenses: 8mm, 14-42mm, 12-60mm, 50-200mm
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 26th July 2010
ewan
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Weight and size of camera gear.

I like to travel light, my favorite combo being an Olympus shoulder bag that just about holds my E-30 with 12-60 attached and 70-300. I find backpacks uncomfortable so I tend to leave mine in the boot with a few other lenses and E-510 just in case needed. I am thinking of getting a bigger shoulder bag or trying a slingshot.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 26th July 2010
StephenL's Avatar
StephenL StephenL is offline
Senior Pixelmonger
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 984
Thanked 1,126 Times in 921 Posts
Likes: 658
Liked 755 Times in 499 Posts
Re: Weight and size of camera gear.

Lightness is important to me, but on the other hand I like the kit to feel substantial. That's why I got rid of my G1, and that's why I like my E-P2.

I agree with Nick about the Slingshot - had one for quite a long while before I realised what was causing severe shoulder impingement! (That was with Canon 5D kit though).
__________________
Stephen

A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

My Flickr site
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 26th July 2010
snaarman's Avatar
snaarman snaarman is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: Baaarkshire UK
Posts: 6,805
Thanks: 491
Thanked 416 Times in 324 Posts
Likes: 488
Liked 1,268 Times in 491 Posts
Re: Weight and size of camera gear.

Yes, lightness for me as well (neck and back problems). So I want small, light, quality gear - hence a E620 and one or maximum 2 pro lenses.

Ideally a showerproof E-camera that is mysteriously lighter than the E620
__________________
Look, I'm an old man. I shouldn't be expected to put up with this.


Pete's photoblog Misleading the public since 2010.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 26th July 2010
ndl0071
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Re: Weight and size of camera gear.

I don't find the weight an issue at all, my normal kit will be the E3/E30 with grip plus 14-35/50-200 plus bits and bobs all packed into a Lowepro sling 200 and if I'm really serious there will be a gitzo tripod and head as well (in it's own bag), I keep meaning to try different types of bag but all the while the sling 200 is serviceable I can't find a good enough excuse to spend the money.
Reply With Quote
  #7  
Old 26th July 2010
DerekC's Avatar
DerekC DerekC is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Posts: 887
Thanks: 212
Thanked 97 Times in 81 Posts
Likes: 37
Liked 43 Times in 20 Posts
Re: Weight and size of camera gear.

Weight is not a problem particuarly now I'v found a bag I like for heavy kit the Vertex 200. I this bag for Motorsport or Wildlife with 2 E-3 90-250, 50-200, 12-60, EC14. I find the Vertex really spreads the weight of the kit and once you have removed what you are shooting with it is no hassle on your back. A Mini Trekker as a general bag with E-3 50-200 and 12-60. for walking a Lowepro combination bag camera bag in base other bits on top. carrying E-510 12-60 and 9-18.
__________________
Derek

____________________________________________

www.dncphotography.co.uk
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 26th July 2010
benvendetta's Avatar
benvendetta benvendetta is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pontypool, South Wales
Posts: 3,714
Thanks: 83
Thanked 294 Times in 260 Posts
Likes: 164
Liked 330 Times in 224 Posts
Re: Weight and size of camera gear.

I do find my E-3 and HG/SHG lenses on the heavy side. Having said that I am used to the quality of the images that I get so it is a price I have to pay. I COULD probably live with an E-620 body but I would still need the decent lenses to use with it.
How I would love to have top bodies and lenses in the old OM tradition!
I will just have to dream on (micro 43rds is not really for me).
__________________
Dave

E-M1 Mk2, Pen F, E-PL5, HLD-9, 17, 45, 60 macro, 12-40 Pro, 40-150 Pro, 12-50, 40-150, 75-300, MC-14, MMF-3 (all micro 4/3rds), 7-14 (4/3rds), 50, 135 (OM), Nikon F80 (film), 28-105 Sigma, GoPro Hero 3, Novo/Giottos/ Manfrotto supports. Lowepro, Tamrac and Billingham bags.

External Competition Secretary, Cwmbran PS & Welsh Photographic Federation Judge
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
HELP! E3 JPeg size IPWheatley Olympus E-3 5 22nd April 2010 09:16 AM
JPEG/File Size/Image Size/Image Quality jdal Software 7 23rd August 2009 01:51 PM
The size of the E-P1 benvendetta Micro Four Thirds 5 4th July 2009 10:33 PM
size matters muckup61 Software 2 5th August 2008 05:50 PM
Camera Gear Insurance? Jim Ford The lounge 9 31st January 2008 07:10 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:56 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger