Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!
|
Home | Forum Index | FAQ | Register | Olympus Hire | Gallery | Members List | Social Groups | Calendar | Search | Today's Posts | Mark Forums Read |
Tutorials, Informative & Classic threads A new e-Group area for all the wonderful tutorials and helpful threads put on here by our members. Tutorials on using software, camera hardware - and feel free to request a tutorial if you need assistance! |
![]() |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
#1
|
||||
|
||||
Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
Should I sacrifice quality for working distance, what say you?
I favour IQ over ED. I have a Panny 60mm macro and a Panny 75-300 with extension tubes. The working distance for the 60mm (end of hood to subject) to get a butterfly to nearly fill the frame is 7". For the 75-300mm at the 300 end, the WD is 39"-54"... yes I know, it's a dream. With the 300 + tubes I get many more shots but of reduced quality. 60mm....100% crop of OOC JPG. ![]() 300mm + tubes..100% crop of OOC JPG. ![]() |
#2
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
I have the Olympus 60mm macro and I tried various combinations with extension tubes.I was never satisfied with the results.I bought a sigma 150 macro,it has the reach,very good image quality.Autofocus can be slow but the lens has a focus ring,3 position focus limiter if you want to speed things up.This is my lens of choice for dragonfly/butterfly photography.The hardest part is finding one.
![]() |
The Following Users Liked This Post: | ||
Minniesmum (5th January 2016), raymondo (22nd July 2015) |
#3
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
I favor IQ over most things. I do however find the extra working distance to be of value for some subjects and where the lighting requires it.
![]()
__________________
Graham We often repeat the mistakes we most enjoy... |
#4
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
I prefer IQ first too. I already had the Sigma 150 macro lens & later added the Oly 60mm macro. I too have tried extension tubes with that (Oly 60mm) & other lenses with less success, but the EX25 (4/3's extension tube) with the Sigma 150 macro lens works well though (as would a M4/3's ext tube set with that lens, I would think).
__________________
Ross I fiddle with violins (when I'm not fiddling with a camera). Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ross-the-fiddler/ Cameras: OM-D E-M1 & Mk II, Olympus Stylus 1, OM-D E-M5. Lenses: M.ZD12-40mm f2.8 PRO Lens, M.ZD40-150mm f2.8 PRO Lens with MC-14, M.ZD12-50, M.ZD60 Macro, M.ZD75-300 Mk II, MMF-3, ZD14-54 II, Sigma 150mm F2.8 APO Macro DG HSM. Flashes: FL36R X2, FL50R, FL50. Software: Capture One Pro 10 (& Olympus Viewer 3). |
#5
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
Whilst IQ is definitely important if you don't have enough working distance your subject may not remain to be photographed...
Once you have enough working distance for your stalking skills (or lighting for static subjects) more working distance is generally fairly irrelevant while more IQ is always good. ![]() |
#6
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
IQ is everything and the Sigma 150mm is a beauty I was considering selling it a while ago but then decided it wasn't worth letting it go after all.
Tom
__________________
"Who is watching the Watchers, watching the Watchers watching us" Its not what you see, it's the way that you see it" Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/photofxstudios |
The Following User Says Thank You to tomphotofx For This Useful Post: | ||
Wee man (22nd July 2015) |
#7
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
Just out of interest, what is the working distance, end of hood to subject, for say a mag of 1:2?
|
#8
|
|||
|
|||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
With my Kiron 105mm macro I have both. I can use a matched TC to increase working distance, with no visible loss of quality.
Harold
__________________
The body is willing but the mind is weak. |
#9
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
Undoubtedly the 60mm is a superb lens IQ wise but the shorter working distance over a 150mm or even 300mm can be an issue in the field where you often have to get down and dirty for the smaller creatures. It is much easier to stealthily approach a wary insect on foot than doing a leopard crawl through the grass. There is the problem of reduced DoF when using longer lenses to be considered and DoF is more often than not the factor that makes or breaks a good macro shot. Personally I don't like the mechanism of focus limiting on the 60mm so I rarely use it - selling it on here soon!
David
__________________
PBase Galleries:-http://www.pbase.com/davidmorisonimages |
#10
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
Dave in Wales from hood to subject at 1:2 is approx 10inches.
Tom
__________________
"Who is watching the Watchers, watching the Watchers watching us" Its not what you see, it's the way that you see it" Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/photofxstudios |
#11
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
Quote:
I expected it to be much more than that, don't ask me why. When I use the Oly Ring Flash with the 60mm, the hood is not used, distance from RF to subject is approx. 5 inches at 1:2. |
#12
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
Quote:
![]() ![]() ![]()
__________________
Ross I fiddle with violins (when I'm not fiddling with a camera). Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ross-the-fiddler/ Cameras: OM-D E-M1 & Mk II, Olympus Stylus 1, OM-D E-M5. Lenses: M.ZD12-40mm f2.8 PRO Lens, M.ZD40-150mm f2.8 PRO Lens with MC-14, M.ZD12-50, M.ZD60 Macro, M.ZD75-300 Mk II, MMF-3, ZD14-54 II, Sigma 150mm F2.8 APO Macro DG HSM. Flashes: FL36R X2, FL50R, FL50. Software: Capture One Pro 10 (& Olympus Viewer 3). |
#13
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
I've come to a decision
![]() Slightly inferior initial RAW IQ and high IQ jpg's for display, how....LR6 sharpening. So it's the 75-300 + 26mm Kenko extension tubes, with the E-M1 onboard flash as fill in. I've always got the 60mm + RF-11 ring flash to fall back on. A working distance of 33" for a magnification of 1:3 is just too good to miss. This is with the 75-300 + tubes and is cropped to about 25% of the frame. ![]() |
The Following User Says Thank You to Dave in Wales For This Useful Post: | ||
The Following Users Liked This Post: | ||
Kiwi Paul (28th July 2015), Ross the fiddler (21st July 2015) |
#14
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
That certainly looks nice!
__________________
Ross I fiddle with violins (when I'm not fiddling with a camera). Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ross-the-fiddler/ Cameras: OM-D E-M1 & Mk II, Olympus Stylus 1, OM-D E-M5. Lenses: M.ZD12-40mm f2.8 PRO Lens, M.ZD40-150mm f2.8 PRO Lens with MC-14, M.ZD12-50, M.ZD60 Macro, M.ZD75-300 Mk II, MMF-3, ZD14-54 II, Sigma 150mm F2.8 APO Macro DG HSM. Flashes: FL36R X2, FL50R, FL50. Software: Capture One Pro 10 (& Olympus Viewer 3). |
#15
|
||||
|
||||
Re: Macro..Sacrifice quality for working distance?
Hi there Dave!
I could be wrong, but isn't the 75-300 supposed to start to soften towards the long end - I'm sure that people have advised to not use at the full extension unless necessary. Perhaps you would get even greater IQ if you limit it to 250mm? Personally I would say that the sigma 150mm is the way to go if you can find one, although it is a big beast to get between flower stems compared to a 60mm Macro. The distance from the lens hood to subject isn't that huge for the focal length, but you can easily get another 80mm or so by removing the lens hood if your lighting is ok. Cheers, Ralph. |
![]() |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
![]() |
||||
Thread | Thread Starter | Forum | Replies | Last Post |
The Ultimate Sacrifice | Harold Gough | The lounge | 3 | 29th November 2014 02:05 PM |
Focus distance of the 60mm macro at 2:1? | Otto | Standard zoom and mid range | 9 | 6th September 2013 04:18 PM |
9-18 mm and hyperfocal distance | Pete_Murrell | Wide angle | 14 | 17th May 2012 02:47 PM |
Hyperfocal Distance | jdal | Camera conference | 19 | 25th April 2011 12:07 PM |
Hyperfocal Distance | knikki | The lounge | 8 | 14th May 2008 05:46 PM |