Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Camera conference > Micro Four Thirds > Olympus OM-D E-M1

Olympus OM-D E-M1 The first Micro Four Thirds camera that offers phase detect focusing so you can use Four Thirds DSLR lenses normally as well a Micro Four Thirds lenses.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 13th April 2015
Olybirder Olybirder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 6,220
Thanks: 2,319
Thanked 941 Times in 749 Posts
Likes: 1,713
Liked 2,595 Times in 802 Posts
Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

I am feeling pretty deflated at the moment. I spent a couple of hours attempting to photograph Marsh Harriers in flight on Friday. The light was good and some of them were approaching unusually close. I have just looked at the results and from over 100 images I have kept just 4 and even they are not very good. None of the others were sharp.

I thought that I had set the camera up as advised for C-AF but it just didn't work. A lot of the time it refused to focus and wouldn't let me take the shot. On other occasions it didn't hold the focus as the bird moved.

I honestly can't see any improvement with v3.0 and my best results are still obtained by using S-AF and continually half pressing the shutter button.

Has anyone had any success using C-AF with v3.0 and, if so, would they care to post some images and reveal the settings and technique used? At the moment I feel like lobbing the camera into the bin!

Ron
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Olybirder For This Useful Post:
Mrs T (17th April 2015)
  #2  
Old 13th April 2015
DavyG DavyG is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 3,064
Thanks: 563
Thanked 413 Times in 324 Posts
Likes: 1,732
Liked 1,281 Times in 303 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

Take a look at the images I posted on this thread Ron:

http://e-group.uk.net/forum/showthread.php?t=36753

I have little or no experience in shooting BIF's however, the images I took of the gulls were the best results I've obtained.

I have a Myset which allows me to use C-AF on Sequential H, I also have the AEL button set up to focus.

Which lens were you using to photograph the Harriers?

Dave
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to DavyG For This Useful Post:
Olybirder (13th April 2015)
  #3  
Old 13th April 2015
Olybirder Olybirder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 6,220
Thanks: 2,319
Thanked 941 Times in 749 Posts
Likes: 1,713
Liked 2,595 Times in 802 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

Thanks Dave. I was using the 75-300 II, which is the only lens that I have for bird photography, apart from the 50-200 SWD but I find that too heavy to use these days.

What is the advantage of using the AEL button?

Ron
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Mdb2 (17th April 2015)
  #4  
Old 13th April 2015
DavyG DavyG is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 3,064
Thanks: 563
Thanked 413 Times in 324 Posts
Likes: 1,732
Liked 1,281 Times in 303 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olybirder View Post
Thanks Dave. I was using the 75-300 II, which is the only lens that I have for bird photography, apart from the 50-200 SWD but I find that too heavy to use these days.

What is the advantage of using the AEL button?

Ron
Hi Ron,

Setting the AEL button to focus allows you to have the camera set up for "back button" focus.

In practice, this means you use your thumb on the AEL button to obtain and hold focus, you the use the shutter button to take the photograph only.

I hope I've explained this clearly and that it's of some help.

I'm planning a trip to Bempton Cliffs next week and intend to try photographing BIF's with both the 40-150 Pro and the 75-300 Mk II hopefully this will help me to improve.

My wife will als be using a 75-300 Mk II on her E-M10, if things go as normal I suspect she'll get some decent images with her rig set up in the same way.

Dave
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to DavyG For This Useful Post:
Olybirder (13th April 2015), Paul19 (29th June 2015)
  #5  
Old 13th April 2015
Wee man's Avatar
Wee man Wee man is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Newcastle Co. Down N. Ireland
Posts: 7,901
Thanks: 2,373
Thanked 1,128 Times in 1,005 Posts
Likes: 281
Liked 1,180 Times in 773 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

Only you are not alone 75-300 mk 2 out this afternoon got a lot of hunting, focus beep, poor shots. Even for nearly static birds and focus peaking still poor shots can I share your bin? Loath to purchase the 40 - 150 2.8f if this is what I will be getting.
__________________
Ed

What if the Hokey Cokey is what its all about?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Wee man For This Useful Post:
Olybirder (13th April 2015)
  #6  
Old 13th April 2015
Olybirder Olybirder is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 6,220
Thanks: 2,319
Thanked 941 Times in 749 Posts
Likes: 1,713
Liked 2,595 Times in 802 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

I think I am probably going to need a bigger bin Ed.

Ron
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
OM USer (29th June 2015)
  #7  
Old 13th April 2015
damianmkv damianmkv is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 363
Thanks: 21
Thanked 35 Times in 31 Posts
Likes: 24
Liked 122 Times in 53 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

I think that the 75-300ii is not the best for BIF, it's "slow" to focus and needs great light to keep the ISO down, especially when you'll be wanting a quick shutter speed. Obvious advantage is reach of course.

On larger subjects, the combination works just fine with either L or H mode.
__________________
D500 / 35 f1.8 / 50 f1.8 /16-80 / 70-300
e-m10 mk2 + P12-32 and PL 25 f1.4
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to damianmkv For This Useful Post:
Olybirder (13th April 2015), Wee man (14th April 2015)
The Following User Liked This Post:
Alpha1 (14th April 2015)
  #8  
Old 13th April 2015
Jim Ford Jim Ford is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Watford, Herts..
Posts: 7,518
Thanks: 386
Thanked 525 Times in 453 Posts
Likes: 2,266
Liked 1,407 Times in 905 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

[QUOTE=DavyG;340005
Setting the AEL button to focus allows you to have the camera set up for "back button" focus.

In practice, this means you use your thumb on the AEL button to obtain and hold focus, you the use the shutter button to take the photograph only.
[/QUOTE]

I've currently got my E5 setup for 'back button focus', but find that "in practice" I often forget and get OOF shots because I only pressed the shutter release button! I'm not sure whether I'll stick with it.

Jim
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Jim Ford For This Useful Post:
Olybirder (13th April 2015)
  #9  
Old 14th April 2015
Ross the fiddler's Avatar
Ross the fiddler Ross the fiddler is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Blue Mtns, NSW Australia
Posts: 13,195
Thanks: 1,976
Thanked 1,239 Times in 981 Posts
Likes: 4,932
Liked 1,809 Times in 1,015 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olybirder View Post
I am feeling pretty deflated at the moment. I spent a couple of hours attempting to photograph Marsh Harriers in flight on Friday. The light was good and some of them were approaching unusually close. I have just looked at the results and from over 100 images I have kept just 4 and even they are not very good. None of the others were sharp.

I thought that I had set the camera up as advised for C-AF but it just didn't work. A lot of the time it refused to focus and wouldn't let me take the shot. On other occasions it didn't hold the focus as the bird moved.

I honestly can't see any improvement with v3.0 and my best results are still obtained by using S-AF and continually half pressing the shutter button.

Has anyone had any success using C-AF with v3.0 and, if so, would they care to post some images and reveal the settings and technique used? At the moment I feel like lobbing the camera into the bin!

Ron
If you are taking shots into less distinct lighting & detail you will get less reliable focus with C-AF (Hi) with the 75-300 (II) lens as it using PD-AF (with all AF lenses). I discovered that last week as well (it was going to be too much weight to take the 50-200 SWD lens so went with the 75-300 II lens instead). The results were quite different using CD-AF in S-AF & Sequential Lo which focusses (& exposes) for each frame. Using C-AF & Hi (fps) in traffic it was quite different as it had something of reasonable detail to work with (as well as good light) & focussed quite well for most frames. I think it's a case of using either one for suitable conditions & low light & indistinct subjects are just not good with PD-AF on the E-M1 (keeping in mind it only uses horizontal sensing & not twin cross types like the E30 & E5) whether it's C-AF Hi or S-AF (for 4/3's lenses).
__________________
Ross
I fiddle with violins (when I'm not fiddling with a camera).
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ross-the-fiddler/
Cameras: OM-D E-M1 & Mk II, Olympus Stylus 1, OM-D E-M5.
Lenses: M.ZD12-40mm f2.8 PRO Lens, M.ZD40-150mm f2.8 PRO Lens with MC-14, M.ZD12-50, M.ZD60 Macro, M.ZD75-300 Mk II, MMF-3, ZD14-54 II, Sigma 150mm F2.8 APO Macro DG HSM.
Flashes: FL36R X2, FL50R, FL50.
Software: Capture One Pro 10 (& Olympus Viewer 3).
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Ross the fiddler For This Useful Post:
Olybirder (14th April 2015)
  #10  
Old 14th April 2015
Miketoll Miketoll is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Suffolk
Posts: 567
Thanks: 99
Thanked 85 Times in 60 Posts
Likes: 71
Liked 126 Times in 80 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

I also read somewhere that with a slow focussing lens like my Panny 100-300 and your 75-300 (II) that in C-AF Hi it is best to limit the FPS to 6 or lower as otherwise the lens can't keep up. This apparently can make quite a difference to the keeper rate but does assume you can get an initial lock in the first place!
The EM-1 is still a long long way behind DSLRs for CAF and I am saving my pennies for an eventual purchase of the Canon 7D II and new 100-400 L lens for just that reason. Unless of course Olympus manage to bring out an EM-1 (II) first with a killer C-AF...
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Miketoll For This Useful Post:
Olybirder (14th April 2015)
  #11  
Old 14th April 2015
TonyR TonyR is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Location: Bath
Posts: 374
Thanks: 0
Thanked 109 Times in 71 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 117 Times in 54 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olybirder View Post
...
A lot of the time it refused to focus and wouldn't let me take the shot...
That sounds like you have Release Priority for C-AF set to Off. Switch it to On so that the shutter can release even if the image is not in focus. Although this sounds stupid (!), it seems to work better when you take a burst of photos.

The other thing that is really important with C-AF is getting the initial focus lock which shows up as a beep and a green rectangle. If you use back button focus, wait until you get the green rectangle before pressing the shutter, and then just keep taking shots for a burst. Sometimes, it takes a few shots before the focus gets really good.

This is a fairly heavy crop of a shot of a Great White Egret taken with the 40-150 f/2.8 + MC-14. One of a burst of about a dozen. It is quite a difficult subject because of the lack of contrast between the bird and the bright sky, but the E-M1 did okay.

Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to TonyR For This Useful Post:
Olybirder (14th April 2015)
The Following User Liked This Post:
Alpha1 (14th April 2015)
  #12  
Old 15th April 2015
David Morison's Avatar
David Morison David Morison is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Fulbeck, Lincolnshire
Posts: 3,507
Thanks: 71
Thanked 588 Times in 472 Posts
Likes: 48
Liked 298 Times in 175 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

I was seriously disappointed when I first tried the EM5 with my 300mm f2.8 and 50-200 SWD, compared to my E5, so much so that I sold both lenses and purchased a Canon 7D and 400mm. The M5 still delighted and I, once again, had great hopes for the M1 and bought one of the first available. I very soon realised that, despite better IQ the M1 could not compete with the 7D for BIFs although I have managed some good results using SAF but I'm no longer patient enough to persevere with CAF. The V3 does seem to have MARGINALLY improved CAF when I tried it on a slow flying Buzzard over the house but my newly aquired 7DII is still so much easier to use, and to be honest it is quite possible to MF a Buzzard, so not a difficult target. The upshot of this is that I will still use the EM1 for BIFs on SAF but only when I don't have the 7DII available to hand. It's horses for courses, the EM1 being my camera of choice for landscape and macro with the Canon for birdies.

David
__________________
PBase Galleries:-http://www.pbase.com/davidmorisonimages
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to David Morison For This Useful Post:
Olybirder (15th April 2015), OM USer (29th June 2015)
  #13  
Old 15th April 2015
Iansky's Avatar
Iansky Iansky is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Cirencester, Glos, UK
Posts: 1,242
Thanks: 878
Thanked 194 Times in 174 Posts
Likes: 391
Liked 292 Times in 150 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

I have to admit to not having the confidence to use CAF for fast moving objects even with the latest firmware, I was hoping to use the EM1+Pany 100-300 for airshow shots but will instead revert to full frame beast.

I do notice that even if I get follow focus when I press the shutter all the way to get the shot there is lag that means I miss the decisive moment.

Any suggestions from the experts who shoot BIF & airshows on a regular basis will be very much appreciated.
__________________
Ian from the Cotswolds
http://571photography.blogspot.co.uk/
Reply With Quote
  #14  
Old 15th April 2015
Mdb2's Avatar
Mdb2 Mdb2 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Hampshire
Posts: 480
Thanks: 55
Thanked 56 Times in 47 Posts
Likes: 36
Liked 46 Times in 40 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

Quote:
Originally Posted by David Morison View Post
I was seriously disappointed when I first tried the EM5 with my 300mm f2.8 and 50-200 SWD, compared to my E5, so much so that I sold both lenses and purchased a Canon 7D and 400mm. The M5 still delighted and I, once again, had great hopes for the M1 and bought one of the first available. I very soon realised that, despite better IQ the M1 could not compete with the 7D for BIFs although I have managed some good results using SAF but I'm no longer patient enough to persevere with CAF. The V3 does seem to have MARGINALLY improved CAF when I tried it on a slow flying Buzzard over the house but my newly aquired 7DII is still so much easier to use, and to be honest it is quite possible to MF a Buzzard, so not a difficult target. The upshot of this is that I will still use the EM1 for BIFs on SAF but only when I don't have the 7DII available to hand. It's horses for courses, the EM1 being my camera of choice for landscape and macro with the Canon for birdies.

David
I fully concur
Kind regards mike
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 16th April 2015
DerekC's Avatar
DerekC DerekC is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Doncaster, South Yorkshire
Posts: 887
Thanks: 212
Thanked 97 Times in 81 Posts
Likes: 37
Liked 43 Times in 20 Posts
Re: Is C-AF actually improved with v3.0?

I can't say that I have notice any difference since V.3, Shooting motorsport I use C-AF but have used mainly L-FPS as it is supposed to re focus for each shot, and therefore I probably will not see the improvement Olympus suggest. H-FPS was tried without any success. Pre V.2 I had serious hunting problems with most lens 35-100 F.2 was terrible. V.2 I found was a fix for this.
Since upgrading to V.3 I have used the E-M1 twice Donington park British Superbikes and Olivers Mount Spring Cup. Corner shots mainly head on with a fast enough shutter speed reasonable success rate. Panning is still bad where the bike is getting closer then going away. One of the issues especially with 4/3rds lens, is often it just doesn't focus. Bike tend to have enough lines and shape to pick up a focus on but many shots are missed due to not focussing. I still take the E-5 with me so when I get frustrated with the poor performance from E-M1 I still have good old reliable.
The other issue I have is noise, although better than E-5 I don't find above iso 1600 any good.
Lens I have tried for motorsport 75-300 mk2, 50-200 swd, 35-100 F2, 90-250 F2.8
__________________
Derek

____________________________________________

www.dncphotography.co.uk
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
C-AF improved since Version 2 Firmware? Bengeo Olympus OM-D E-M1 48 1st December 2014 07:40 PM
Where is the improved E-P1 noise performance? Ian Olympus Pen E-P1 4 3rd October 2009 03:22 PM
Improved repair service - a different kind of wish for Watanabe-san Gwyver Announcements 5 5th April 2009 06:33 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 08:55 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger