Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > General photography discussion

General photography discussion Please look for a specific board to start your thread but if you can't find an appropriate one, post it here.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 16th January 2019
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,619
Thanks: 369
Thanked 1,240 Times in 929 Posts
Likes: 145
Liked 5,924 Times in 1,923 Posts
Interesting article from Thom Hogan about mirrorless in 2019

Quote:
That m4/3 customer wanting smaller/lighter product used to be me, but lately Olympus is losing me. The full frame bodies have come way down in size, and I'm now starting to find lenses that make for a really small kit. Smaller than my m4/3 kit in some cases, with more and better pixels. Olympus is trying to deliver more pixels through the pixel shift arrangement, which helps for totally static subjects, but not for everything. They're truly in a defensive game here, and they're no longer fielding a full team.

I can't see how this ends any way other than constrained niche for Olympus. The question is whether that niche is big enough to be sustainable. Maybe. The jury is out on that.

2019 is the year Olympus needs to tell us what the future is really like for them. Their partner Panasonic has already taken that step (e.g. adding full frame). And I'm going to argue that the E-M1x is not an answer to that question.

Olympus is now in the back of the pack with Pentax: interesting products, but not mainstream and not producing volume in sales.
http://www.sansmirror.com/newsviews/...is-headed.html
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pdk42 For This Useful Post:
Bruce Clarke (16th January 2019), OM USer (17th January 2019)
  #2  
Old 16th January 2019
Keith-369 Keith-369 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: North West England
Posts: 1,563
Thanks: 95
Thanked 175 Times in 155 Posts
Likes: 809
Liked 457 Times in 240 Posts
Re: Interesting article from Thom Hogan about mirrorless in 2019

Hogan says "I'm now starting to find lenses that make for a really small kit".

Can't see him using long or long tele's then.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 16th January 2019
Bruce Clarke's Avatar
Bruce Clarke Bruce Clarke is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Oxford
Posts: 456
Thanks: 60
Thanked 46 Times in 35 Posts
Likes: 116
Liked 63 Times in 46 Posts
Re: Interesting article from Thom Hogan about mirrorless in 2019

Thanks Paul, very interesting read. Several companies seem to have a gap between their messaging, and what they are delivering. At present, Oly's gap is more of a gulf. I hope they address this before it's too late.

At a simplistic level, they used to feature high up in the top tens of mirrorless, but have all but disappeared. Partly of course because the party is getting more crowded.
__________________
Bruce

http://flickr.com/photos/bruce-clarke/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 16th January 2019
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,619
Thanks: 369
Thanked 1,240 Times in 929 Posts
Likes: 145
Liked 5,924 Times in 1,923 Posts
Re: Interesting article from Thom Hogan about mirrorless in 2019

Quote:
Originally Posted by Bruce Clarke View Post
Thanks Paul, very interesting read. Several companies seem to have a gap between their messaging, and what they are delivering. At present, Oly's gap is more of a gulf. I hope they address this before it's too late.

At a simplistic level, they used to feature high up in the top tens of mirrorless, but have all but disappeared. Partly of course because the party is getting more crowded.
I know there will be a lot of people who disagree, but I think Hogan is right in identifying that Olympus is facing significant challenges. When I switched from Canon FF (5dii) to m43 in 2013 I found a system that was smaller, cheaper, higher in function and very very close in terms of IQ. The 16Mp Sony sensor in the E-M5 was a significant step up and it narrowed the gap in IQ to almost nothing. I lost very little but gained a lot. It was a time when m43 was acquiring new users.

The intervening years though have seen full frame (135 format) mirrorless advance at a spectacular rate to the point now where except for long tele lenses, the size difference is not large but the IQ difference is enormous.

Really for most people embarking now on a new system for serious general photography it would be hard to recommend u43. And for existing users of Canon or Nikon DSLRs they can now stay in their own eco-system or even go to Sony. The net result is that there's far fewer new users coming into the system than 5 or 6 years ago. Olympus is increasingly appealing only to the converted.

So what to do? Because of the sensor size difference, Olympus will never win the IQ marketing fight against FF (even if fewer than 1% of buyers actually need that improved IQ) so they need to take the fight elsewhere. They need to embrace the smaller sensor and take it into one of two places IMHO:

- The "Reduced to Perfection" story for general photography (landscape, street, portrait, studio) - small, light, high features, IQ good enough.

- Top platform for sports and wildlife - where the smaller sensor can offer significant weight savings for equivalent reach.

The former needs a new generation of the E-M5, but with an improved sensor and decent CAF. The bar for "good enough IQ" needs to be noise performance at least 1 stop above where it was on the original M5, and ideally better. I'm talking raw file performance here, not improved jpeg NR.

The latter needs speed, top class AF and improved noise handling.

The upcoming E-M1x is clearly a play for the latter and if they do eventually get AF right then I think with the current lens range they must be in with a very good shot at it.

The former is a much harder sell though and unfortunately they'll always be on the wrong side of the price curve (from Olympus's point of view) since people won't value the smaller sensor as highly because the the IQ will always be worse.

From my point of view, I'll be watching what Olympus do this coming year carefully. If the E-M1x is the only real step forward I'll be getting concerned as to whether there's a place for me in their future.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Bengeo (17th January 2019), blu-by-u (19th January 2019)
  #5  
Old 16th January 2019
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 5,426
Thanks: 336
Thanked 477 Times in 400 Posts
Likes: 2,094
Liked 1,233 Times in 703 Posts
Re: Interesting article from Thom Hogan about mirrorless in 2019

Well, we’ll see.

Hogan’s already been proved wrong about his prognostications on the Sony A6xxx series: the 6400 has just been announced and looks very interesting.
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
http://www.microcontrast.com
Too much Oly gear.
Panasonic 12-32, 12-35, 15. Laowa 7.5.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70 & a Sony A7S.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 16th January 2019
Olybirder Olybirder is online now
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Norfolk
Posts: 6,531
Thanks: 2,378
Thanked 969 Times in 768 Posts
Likes: 1,875
Liked 2,855 Times in 841 Posts
Re: Interesting article from Thom Hogan about mirrorless in 2019

There is an interesting thread on DPReview at the moment, entitled 'Latest E-M1X tidbits (MAJOR, if true).' I have no idea whether it is true or not but, if it is, Olympus might have wrong footed many of their critics.

Ron
Reply With Quote
The Following User Says Thank You to Olybirder For This Useful Post:
OM USer (17th January 2019)
  #7  
Old 17th January 2019
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 5,426
Thanks: 336
Thanked 477 Times in 400 Posts
Likes: 2,094
Liked 1,233 Times in 703 Posts
Re: Interesting article from Thom Hogan about mirrorless in 2019

Quote:
Originally Posted by Olybirder View Post
There is an interesting thread on DPReview at the moment, entitled 'Latest E-M1X tidbits (MAJOR, if true).' I have no idea whether it is true or not but, if it is, Olympus might have wrong footed many of their critics.

Ron
There’s the usual range of dpreview psychopathology on display in it, for sure

Plus the bloke claiming the M1ii VF was no improvement over that of the i has obviously never tried to use 10fps+ to photograph anything that moves...

Again, we’ll just have to see.
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
http://www.microcontrast.com
Too much Oly gear.
Panasonic 12-32, 12-35, 15. Laowa 7.5.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70 & a Sony A7S.
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 17th January 2019
OM USer's Avatar
OM USer OM USer is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: London
Posts: 11,712
Thanks: 2,292
Thanked 1,467 Times in 1,395 Posts
Likes: 5,979
Liked 1,371 Times in 875 Posts
Re: Interesting article from Thom Hogan about mirrorless in 2019

Quote:
Originally Posted by pdk42 View Post
...If the E-M1x is the only real step forward I'll be getting concerned as to whether there's a place for me in their future.
I think you have summed it up concisely. I'm will be far more interested if/when they announce an E-M5iii.
__________________
Cameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, M.ZD 40-150 F4-5.6 R, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
Learn something new every day
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Thom Hogan slams Olympus M 4/3 Pistnbroke General photography discussion 57 16th July 2018 01:06 PM
Thom Hogan review of E-M1ii pdk42 Olympus OM-D E-M1 Mark II 6 21st August 2017 11:27 AM
Interesting Article LR vs CO maccabeej Software 1 15th October 2016 05:40 AM
Thom Hogan on the future of Olympus. Wally The lounge 2 14th February 2011 08:20 PM
Olympus prediction from Thom Hogan ardvorlich The lounge 0 13th November 2010 07:05 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:43 PM.


© The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger