Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Lens focus > Standard zoom and mid range

Standard zoom and mid range Lenses with focal lengths larger than 12mm, but no longer than 60mm, includes standard zooms and portrait primes plus some macro lenses.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12th July 2015
Dave in Wales's Avatar
Dave in Wales Dave in Wales is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: West Wales
Posts: 1,088
Thanks: 60
Thanked 149 Times in 122 Posts
Likes: 136
Liked 661 Times in 234 Posts
Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

I'm considering letting the Oly go and replacing it with a Panasonic 14-45mm f3.5-5.6.

Why, because the 12-40 is just TOOOO BIG AND HEAVY.

I don't really need f2.8.

I've had the the Panny 14-45 before, years ago, beautiful little lens.

'Little'...isn't that what M4/3 is supposed to be all about?
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
mstphoto (26th August 2015)
  #2  
Old 12th July 2015
benvendetta's Avatar
benvendetta benvendetta is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Pontypool, South Wales
Posts: 3,742
Thanks: 83
Thanked 296 Times in 261 Posts
Likes: 167
Liked 338 Times in 228 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

I wouldn't change my 12-40 for anything! As for its size, it may not be as small as the kit lenses but it certainly isn't large, to me at least (I came from 43rds and an e3 and ZD Zuikos). The size is perfect for the em1. Mind you, the 40-150 Pro is quite bulky and despite convincing my wife that it was loads smaller than the 43rds 50-200 that it replaced, I don't think the difference is that great. However, It is a brilliant lens, as is the 12-40 and f2.8 is pretty important for low light and getting shallow dof and is the reason why they are larger than their kit lens equivalents. These two lenses, plus my humunguss (you wouldn't like it, lol) 7-14 plus mmf3 are the mainstays of my em1 kit.
The m43rds Pro equipment is near on perfect for me.
__________________
Dave

E-M1 Mk2, Pen F, HLD-9, 17, 25, 45, 60 macro, 12-40 Pro, 40-150 Pro, 12-50, 40-150, 75-300, MC-14, MMF-3 (all micro 4/3rds), 7-14 (4/3rds), 50, 135 (OM), GoPro Hero 3, Novo/Giottos/ Manfrotto supports. Lowepro, Tamrac and Billingham bags.

External Competition Secretary, Cwmbran PS & Welsh Photographic Federation Judge
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Wee man (10th August 2015)
  #3  
Old 12th July 2015
m-888-khan m-888-khan is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: southshields
Posts: 158
Thanks: 11
Thanked 7 Times in 7 Posts
Likes: 7
Liked 1 Time in 1 Post
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

you can also change it to panasonic 12-35,but if you don't need f2.8 then 14-45 is best lens
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12th July 2015
pvasc pvasc is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 680
Thanks: 90
Thanked 139 Times in 112 Posts
Likes: 59
Liked 101 Times in 59 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

I like the 12-40mm, can't afford one, but I like it. I did a very quick test comparing it with the 14-45mm at SWPP. Not much in it, but as I said a it was very quick, and I think I may have move a bit when I shot with it. I find it hard to settle down at those shows and really investigate the product. But over all the result did not make me want to rush out and buy one, I was hoping it would.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12th July 2015
pvasc pvasc is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 680
Thanks: 90
Thanked 139 Times in 112 Posts
Likes: 59
Liked 101 Times in 59 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

I, if needed, have been known to run the 14-54mm on the M10. Not really a problem with size, but I do carry by the lens, and support the camera at all times. Don't trust the adapter.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 12th July 2015
martyjward's Avatar
martyjward martyjward is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Essex, UK
Posts: 257
Thanks: 28
Thanked 39 Times in 34 Posts
Likes: 2
Liked 73 Times in 41 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

Gotta agree with benvendetta the pro lenses are worth the extra weight & size. Just wish my skills could make the most of them.
__________________
OMD E-M1, 12-40 f2.8 pro, 40-150 f2.8 pro, MC-14, MMF-3 & 70-300 f4-5.6

E-620, 12-40 , 40-150 f4-5.6,

https://www.flickr.com/photos/68406149@N08/
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Melaka (12th July 2015), pvasc (12th July 2015)
  #7  
Old 12th July 2015
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,671
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,245 Times in 934 Posts
Likes: 149
Liked 5,949 Times in 1,938 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

The size of the 12-40 is on the big side, I agree. Whilst the 14-45 is smaller and IQ pretty good, you'll lose 2mm at the wide end and up to 2 stops of light gathering. For me, these would be problems unless I was treating the zoom only as a casual, daytime walkabout lens. If you're planning to use a standard range zoom for more serious use then lenses like the 14-45 aren't really ideal. Take a look at the 12-35 first - it's notably smaller and lighter than the 12-40.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
  #8  
Old 12th July 2015
pvasc pvasc is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 680
Thanks: 90
Thanked 139 Times in 112 Posts
Likes: 59
Liked 101 Times in 59 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

And they tend to let in water and dust. (14-45mm)
Reply With Quote
  #9  
Old 12th July 2015
zuiko-holic's Avatar
zuiko-holic zuiko-holic is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Athens, Greece
Posts: 282
Thanks: 31
Thanked 24 Times in 20 Posts
Likes: 17
Liked 12 Times in 5 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave in Wales View Post
'Little'...isn't that what M4/3 is supposed to be all about?
Not exactly.
m4/3 is supposed to be smaller than regular 4/3 which was supposed to be smaller than competitive crop systems and FF.









One cannot just use terms like "little" and "small" out of context.
The terms are relative and you have to compare to what are the other options. And the pictures above really show how small the Zuiko 12-40 is.
If size is all that matters, then we would probably use pocket cameras or our smartphones.

True, the Zuiko 12-40 could probably be a bit smaller and lighter but that would mean worse construction quality (don't forget it is a weather-proof and all-metal lens).
A lens of this caliber is supposed to be of top quality so it can match the quality of a professional camera body (and with the battery grip attached).
I've used a friend's E-M1+HLD-7 with this lens it actually brought balance to the Force! Awesome combination...

I totally agree that the Lumix 14-45 is a wonderful lens, but it cannot really match the Zuiko 12-40 in any aspect.
__________________
Quote:
After breaking through the technology barrier,
you run into the barrier of accepted wisdom.
-Yoshihisa Maitani
Reply With Quote
The Following 4 Users Say Thank You to zuiko-holic For This Useful Post:
DavidJ1609 (14th July 2015), Graham_of_Rainham (12th July 2015), Tucksy81 (10th August 2015), Wee man (12th July 2015)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Graham_of_Rainham (12th July 2015), tomphotofx (12th July 2015), Wee man (10th August 2015)
  #10  
Old 12th July 2015
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 5,792
Thanks: 592
Thanked 421 Times in 373 Posts
Likes: 787
Liked 1,919 Times in 1,143 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by pvasc View Post
I, if needed, have been known to run the 14-54mm on the M10. Not really a problem with size, but I do carry by the lens, and support the camera at all times. Don't trust the adapter.
What adapter are you using? I have the 14-54 MkII with MMF-1 (both up for sale, incidentally) the adapter is as solid as metal can be, it feels like a natural extension of the lens.
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #11  
Old 12th July 2015
Ricoh Ricoh is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Lancashire
Posts: 5,792
Thanks: 592
Thanked 421 Times in 373 Posts
Likes: 787
Liked 1,919 Times in 1,143 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

Relating to the statement above that the 12-40 is metallic, yes it is, but only superficially. The internal bulk is plastic, and the metalic lens mount is screwed into the plastic inner body (without inserts to spread the load).
__________________
Steve

on flickr
Reply With Quote
  #12  
Old 12th July 2015
Bikie John's Avatar
Bikie John Bikie John is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Wessex
Posts: 3,889
Thanks: 186
Thanked 639 Times in 567 Posts
Likes: 471
Liked 712 Times in 478 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave in Wales View Post
'Little'...isn't that what M4/3 is supposed to be all about?
No.

It is not what m43 is ALL about.

The architecture means that for some applications it can be small. We have small kit lenses, I think there is a pancake and even some of the fast primes are tiny compared to the opposition. However, it doesn't mean that everything HAS TO be small. If you want long and/or fast it is inevitably going to be big - that is just the laws of physics and as we all know, ye canna change them, cap'n.

M4/3 means that if you want small you can have it. You will have to make compromises like maximum aperture - so if you don't need f/2.8 you can indeed get a smaller lens. It has taken a while but I think that m4/3 has delivered on its promise, offering small lightweight options where possible but still offering a more-or-less full system for those who want it. And there some outstanding gems such as the much-admired 45mm f/1.8 - compare that with 35mm-format equivalents and you will immediately see how much has been achieved.

John
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
Kiwi Paul (27th August 2015), Ross the fiddler (12th July 2015), zuiko-holic (12th July 2015)
  #13  
Old 12th July 2015
Zuiko's Avatar
Zuiko Zuiko is offline
Administrator
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Dunmow, Essex
Posts: 22,000
Thanks: 1,976
Thanked 3,140 Times in 2,449 Posts
Likes: 3,362
Liked 4,437 Times in 2,104 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dave in Wales View Post
I'm considering letting the Oly go and replacing it with a Panasonic 14-45mm f3.5-5.6.

Why, because the 12-40 is just TOOOO BIG AND HEAVY.

I don't really need f2.8.

I've had the the Panny 14-45 before, years ago, beautiful little lens.

'Little'...isn't that what M4/3 is supposed to be all about?
I've got a Panny 14-45mm, I'll do a straight swap with you!
__________________
John

"A hundredth of a second here, a hundredth of a second there even if you put them end to end, they still only add up to one, two, perhaps three seconds, snatched from eternity." ~ Robert Doisneau
Reply With Quote
The Following User Liked This Post:
Ross the fiddler (12th July 2015)
  #14  
Old 12th July 2015
Ross the fiddler's Avatar
Ross the fiddler Ross the fiddler is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Blue Mtns, NSW Australia
Posts: 13,771
Thanks: 2,024
Thanked 1,300 Times in 1,015 Posts
Likes: 5,279
Liked 1,943 Times in 1,079 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
What adapter are you using? I have the 14-54 MkII with MMF-1 (both up for sale, incidentally) the adapter is as solid as metal can be, it feels like a natural extension of the lens.
I think (but could be wrong) that the MMF-1 is a metal adapter while the MMF-3 appears to be plastic in the body (not the mounts), which could make the MMF-1 more desirable (except for the weight). I'd be happy to be corrected on that though.
__________________
Ross
I fiddle with violins (when I'm not fiddling with a camera).
Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/ross-the-fiddler/
Cameras: OM-D E-M1 & Mk II, Olympus Stylus 1, OM-D E-M5.
Lenses: M.ZD12-40mm f2.8 PRO Lens, M.ZD40-150mm f2.8 PRO Lens with MC-14, M.ZD12-50, M.ZD60 Macro, M.ZD75-300 Mk II, MMF-3, ZD14-54 II, Sigma 150mm F2.8 APO Macro DG HSM.
Flashes: FL36R X2, FL50R, FL50.
Software: Capture One Pro 10 (& Olympus Viewer 3).
Reply With Quote
  #15  
Old 12th July 2015
pvasc pvasc is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 680
Thanks: 90
Thanked 139 Times in 112 Posts
Likes: 59
Liked 101 Times in 59 Posts
Re: Oly 12-40 Pro 'out'..Panny 14-45 'in'..well maybe.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Ricoh View Post
What adapter are you using? I have the 14-54 MkII with MMF-1 (both up for sale, incidentally) the adapter is as solid as metal can be, it feels like a natural extension of the lens.
I have the MMF-2. Didn't realize the _1 was metal. The lens is the Mk1 version. Apparently for m4/3's have have the wrong lenses....14-54 Mk1 and 50-20mm Mk2. Should be the other way around.
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Panny 7-14 arrived. Dave in Wales Wide angle 12 3rd July 2015 06:34 PM
Sold Panny 100-300 f/4-5.6 Lens james n For sale or wanted small ads 3 9th December 2014 01:33 PM
EM1 plus Panny 25mm f1.4 Swordfish Foto Fair 2 5th May 2014 08:58 PM
Panny GH3 Greytop Camera conference 5 29th November 2012 06:18 PM
Anybody using a Panny 14-140? baldyb Micro Four Thirds 8 2nd June 2011 02:52 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:35 AM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger