Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Software

Software Discuss Olympus Master, Studio and Viewer software applications as well as third party programs like Adobe Photoshop, Lightroom, Apple Aperture, and others.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 2nd August 2008
Dick Bowman Dick Bowman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/a
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Any downside to Silkypix?

Last time I went through the "which RAW processor to use?" I settled on RawShooter - which was fine until Adobe decided to buy the company and stop development.

Which was recoverable because they gave Lightroom 1 to registered Rawshooter users. Happyish with the processing options that Lightroom gives, but don't care for Adobe as a company, and really dislike all the cataloguing nonsense (quite capable of organising that for myself thankyou).

Now here comes Lightroom 2 as a paid-for upgrade (I know I don't have to upgrade, but past experience tells me that older versions of Adobe stuff get left high-and-dry). For whatever reason I can't reach the Adobe website this week.

So I looked around again, mostly at Silkypix because it was a near miss last time I paid for PP software - Version 3 seems a step up from Version 2. Started a trial, like the results. Takes a bit of adjusting to, but I think I'm mostly there.

But, are there any bears lurking in the undergrowth that would make me regret?

In the interim I've looked casually at most of the alternatives - haven't been much tempted. But if anyone knows something that's "streets ahead" that would be interesting.
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 2nd August 2008
StephenL's Avatar
StephenL StephenL is offline
Senior Pixelmonger
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Yorkshire Dales
Posts: 9,863
Thanks: 984
Thanked 1,126 Times in 921 Posts
Likes: 658
Liked 755 Times in 499 Posts
Re: Any downside to Silkypix?

I'm going through exactly the same angst, and for much the same reasons. Studio 2.2 isn't at all bad. I tried Silkypix a couple of years back but was frustrated by the interface (perhaps I wasn't patient enough!). Rawtherapee is OKish and free but somehow I can't quite get the "bite" that Rawshooter used to give me on Canon files.
__________________
Stephen

A camera takes a picture. A photographer makes a picture

Fuji X system, + Leica and Bronica film

My Flickr site
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 2nd August 2008
andym's Avatar
andym andym is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Epping Forest
Posts: 4,349
Thanks: 37
Thanked 345 Times in 257 Posts
Likes: 39
Liked 1,004 Times in 297 Posts
Re: Any downside to Silkypix?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dick Bowman View Post
Last time I went through the "which RAW processor to use?" I settled on RawShooter - which was fine until Adobe decided to buy the company and stop development.

Which was recoverable because they gave Lightroom 1 to registered Rawshooter users. Happyish with the processing options that Lightroom gives, but don't care for Adobe as a company, and really dislike all the cataloguing nonsense (quite capable of organising that for myself thankyou).

Now here comes Lightroom 2 as a paid-for upgrade (I know I don't have to upgrade, but past experience tells me that older versions of Adobe stuff get left high-and-dry). For whatever reason I can't reach the Adobe website this week.

So I looked around again, mostly at Silkypix because it was a near miss last time I paid for PP software - Version 3 seems a step up from Version 2. Started a trial, like the results. Takes a bit of adjusting to, but I think I'm mostly there.

But, are there any bears lurking in the undergrowth that would make me regret?

In the interim I've looked casually at most of the alternatives - haven't been much tempted. But if anyone knows something that's "streets ahead" that would be interesting.
I use Silkypix as my main raw developer.I work my way down the five main settings on the left hand side.
I dont find it hard to use at all.
I like the way you can save parameters and recall them.For my general pictures I load film colour version 1 and start from there.Also I think the noise reduction is very good with lots of fine adjustment.
__________________
All the best

Being left handed my brain sometimes works sdrawkcab

Andy

Lots of cameras and lenses.


My Flickr
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 3rd August 2008
OlyPaul's Avatar
OlyPaul OlyPaul is offline
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: West Midlands
Posts: 5,470
Thanks: 140
Thanked 715 Times in 577 Posts
Likes: 177
Liked 875 Times in 355 Posts
Re: Any downside to Silkypix?

Silkypix can be a little hard to get your head around initially due to the terminology used,even magazine reviewers have said it does not have features that it does and that it does not do batchwork well (it does when you know how) but it really is a program that rewards the effort of learning it.

As Andy pointed out there are the five main adujustments in the main side bar.
But eight more can be brought up from the icons at the bottom of it.

__________________
Regards Paul.
One day I hope to be the person my dogs think I am.

https://www.flickr.com/photos/paul_silk/
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 3rd August 2008
Dick Bowman Dick Bowman is offline
Banned
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: N/a
Posts: 124
Thanks: 0
Thanked 7 Times in 6 Posts
Likes: 0
Liked 2 Times in 2 Posts
Re: Any downside to Silkypix?

Partly answering my own question...

One downside appears to be a very restrictive/paranoid licensing policy. It seems that the licence is strictly for one machine - there may be a supplemental licence fee payable if people want to use Silkypix occasionally on a travelling laptop. It's also not clear whether the licence can be transferred onto replacement machines at end of hardware life. I'm asking Silkypix/Shortcut to clarify here.

As for the interface - yes, it's "different" - but that doesn't have to be a bad thing.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 3rd August 2008
jdal's Avatar
jdal jdal is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Northumberland
Posts: 4,039
Thanks: 129
Thanked 503 Times in 439 Posts
Likes: 199
Liked 664 Times in 282 Posts
Re: Any downside to Silkypix?

From Shortcut Inc, who license Silkypix these days: "Yes we do offer licenses for a 2nd computer. They are 29$ only if your second computer is running the same operating system." (from their forum).

hmm.. not very good really. I have version 2 on the laptop, which wasn't so restrictive, and run version 3 on my home PC but I haven't used the laptop recently and V2 may not suppprt the E3.

The program itself I find to be very good. I like it's resizing, perspective correction & rotating functionality particularly. The Oly colours are very good. and in general there is shed loads of functionality.


ps my virus checker thinks that the homepage of www dot shortcutinc dot com has a virus. It may well have, so be careful.
__________________
John

m4/3: E-P2, EM-5, 100-300, 14-42mm 12-50mm, 45mm, panny 14mm. 4/3: 7-14 + Flashes & tripods & stuff

"Take nothing but pictures and leave nothing but footprints".

Flickr gallery
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
E-420 now supported by Silkypix OlyPaul Software 0 10th May 2008 07:11 AM
Silkypix installation problem. Jim Ford Software 8 4th April 2008 03:56 PM
Silkypix Raw support for E3 andym Software 0 1st December 2007 12:30 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 07:36 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2019, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger