Olympus UK E-System User Group
Olympus UK E-System User Group

Join our unique resource for Olympus Four Thirds E-System DSLR and Pen and OM-D Micro Four Thirds photographers. Show your images via our free e-group photo gallery. Please read the e-group.uk.net forum terms and conditions before posting for the first time. Above all, welcome!


Go Back   Olympus UK E-System User Group > Cameras, lenses and system accessories > Lens focus > Wide angle

Wide angle Lenses with focal lengths shorter than 14mm.

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
MikeOxon MikeOxon is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: oxford
Posts: 325
Thanks: 31
Thanked 60 Times in 54 Posts
Likes: 33
Liked 115 Times in 74 Posts
Fish-eye and De-fish

I have a Meike 6.5mm fish-eye lens in MFT mount, which I use on my Olympus E-M1 Mk.ii. This lens has received very good reviews and at around 125 for a fast - f/2 aperture - ultra-wide lens, I believe it represents excellent value-for-money.

It has been criticised because, since it was originally designed for APS cameras, the top and bottom of the circular image are slightly clipped by the MFT frame. In practice, I have not found this to be a problem, since these areas tend to contain sky and feet, which can be 'dubbed' in with an editor.

Recently, I have been visiting several National Trust houses, which now allow photography, providing flash is not used. This presents a challenge, since light-levels are often low and it can be difficult to capture the overall look of small interior rooms. The Meike excels in both light-capturing ability, with good image quality, even at full aperture, and field of view.

I also use the 'PanoTools' 'remap' plug-in for Photoshop, which can do a good job of converting the circular image to a conventional rectilinear image, with what I consider to be remarkably good results. (PanoTools is a free suite of programs and libraries originally written by the German physics and mathematics professor Helmut Dersch.)

The following images show the results of 'de-fishing' one of my photos from Wadesdon Manor, using the PanoTools plug-in:





For comparison with a more conventional lens, the image below marks the area covered by my Olympus 9-18mm zoom, when used from the same location. as the Meike (de-fished).






Finally, an image that can only be made with a super-wide lens - this is the 'de-fished' view from the Meike, looking vertically upwards from inside the Dairy Court at Chastleton House:


__________________
Mike
visit my Natural History Photos website:
http://home.btconnect.com/mike.flemming/

Last edited by MikeOxon; 4 Weeks Ago at 03:30 PM. Reason: improved re-mapping
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
drmarkf (4 Weeks Ago), Graham from Wirral (4 Weeks Ago), Keith-369 (4 Weeks Ago), MJ224 (4 Weeks Ago), Otto (4 Weeks Ago), wornish (4 Weeks Ago)
  #2  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
Otto's Avatar
Otto Otto is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: North Yorkshire
Posts: 1,975
Thanks: 75
Thanked 196 Times in 169 Posts
Likes: 615
Liked 517 Times in 340 Posts
Re: Fish-eye and De-fish

The "de-fishing" seems to work very well, although there is still a bit of distortion. Inevitable I suppose. I use my 9-18 a lot in such places and am generally pleased with the results. DxO does a good job of removing the minor distortions and aberrations. I'm quite surprised at how much extra the fisheye can see. I have the 16mm OM full-frame fisheye but I doubt the f-o-v on mFT would be much wider than the 9-18. I suppose I should try it and see!
__________________
Regards
Richard
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
MikeOxon MikeOxon is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: oxford
Posts: 325
Thanks: 31
Thanked 60 Times in 54 Posts
Likes: 33
Liked 115 Times in 74 Posts
Re: Fish-eye and De-fish

Quote:
Originally Posted by Otto View Post
......... I'm quite surprised at how much extra the fisheye can see. ..............

So was I, when I first saw the de-fish results .

The settings for FOV in the PanoTools menu are quite critical for controlling the curvature at the edges. Since I first posted, I've made a further small adjustment to the second image, which has helped a little.


My fish-eye shots were all taken at f/2. Possible a smaller aperture would improve edge definition but my objective was to test the low-light capability
__________________
Mike
visit my Natural History Photos website:
http://home.btconnect.com/mike.flemming/
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
drmarkf's Avatar
drmarkf drmarkf is online now
Full member
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Cambridge, UK
Posts: 4,458
Thanks: 284
Thanked 410 Times in 344 Posts
Likes: 1,520
Liked 1,044 Times in 586 Posts
Re: Fish-eye and De-fish

That's really good, especially considering the cost of admission.

I'm looking forward to seeing what the new range of Laowa ultrawide and FE lenses for MFT can do. Their 7.5mm has extremely low rectilinear distortion, and stopped down a bit gives superb results. These are likely to be significantly more expensive than your lens, but still considerably cheaper than anything Oly/Panny are ever likely to produce.
__________________
Regards,
Mark

------------------------------
http://www.microcontrast.com
Too much Oly gear.
Panasonic 12-35, 15. Samyang 7.5 fisheye. Laowa 7.5.
Assorted legacy lenses, plus a Fuji X70.
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
OM USer's Avatar
OM USer OM USer is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: London
Posts: 10,187
Thanks: 1,910
Thanked 1,336 Times in 1,276 Posts
Likes: 5,047
Liked 1,103 Times in 755 Posts
Re: Fish-eye and De-fish

Small enough to fit in my bag and certainly a good price. Your de-fished reults look very promising.
__________________
Cameras: E-M5, E-PM2, OM40, OM4Ti
Lenses (M.Zuiko Digital): 7-14mm/F2.8, 12-40mm/F2.8, 40-150mm/F2.8+TC1.4x, 12-50mm/F3.5-6.3, 14-42mm/F3.5-5.6 EZ, 75-300mm/F4.8-6.7 Mk1, 12mm/F2, 17mm/F1.8
Lenses (OM Zuiko): 50mm/F1.2, 24mm/F2, 35mm/F2.8 shift
Lenses (OM Fit): Vivitar Series II 28-105mm/F2.8-3.8, Sigma 21-35mm/F3.4-4.2, Sigma 35-70mm/F2.8-4, Sigma 75-200mm/F2.8-3.5, Vivitar Series II 100-500mm/F5.6-8.0, Centon 500mm/F8 Mirror
If you learn something new each day then that is not a day wasted.
Reply With Quote
  #6  
Old 4 Weeks Ago
MikeOxon MikeOxon is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Location: oxford
Posts: 325
Thanks: 31
Thanked 60 Times in 54 Posts
Likes: 33
Liked 115 Times in 74 Posts
Re: Fish-eye and De-fish

Quote:
Originally Posted by OM USer View Post
............ Your de-fished results look very promising.

I tried photographing a large wall from very close, to test the de-fish performance. The brickwork itself was not perfectly even but this is the result, before and after de-fish:





To test resolution of the Meike 6.5mm towards the edge of the frame, I took the following shot at f/8 (looking vertically upwards) and then compared with an actual-pixels area, near the edge:


__________________
Mike
visit my Natural History Photos website:
http://home.btconnect.com/mike.flemming/
Reply With Quote
Reply

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
Samyang 7.5mm F3.5 Fish-eye martyjward Wide angle 52 7th March 2016 02:39 PM
Lixouri Fish bilbo Foto Fair 6 29th October 2014 08:33 AM
Fish offered sapper The lounge 7 25th June 2012 08:45 PM
HELP! Fish ID needed please Barr1e The lounge 11 19th January 2012 08:53 PM
Wanted 8MM Fish Eye Roger.Tomblin@vodafone.ne For sale or wanted small ads 0 10th April 2011 09:33 PM


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:07 PM.


The Write Technology Ltd, 2007-2018, All rights reservedAd Management plugin by RedTyger