Thread: Guess the iso.
View Single Post
  #35  
Old 13th January 2019
pdk42's Avatar
pdk42 pdk42 is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Leamington Spa
Posts: 5,672
Thanks: 370
Thanked 1,245 Times in 934 Posts
Likes: 149
Liked 5,949 Times in 1,938 Posts
Re: Guess the iso.

The problem with high ISO performance is that the subjective results depend on so many factors:

- The size of the output. Frankly at 1024px long side from an uncropped image I'd be surprised if any of the 16Mp Oly cameras struggle at 6400.

- The lighting. High ISO in good lighting always looks better.

- Sharpness - good glass and no motion/camera blur will yield an apparently cleaner image.

- Subject matter - even-textured surfaces will hide noise. Worst for noise is small sharp edges that we expect to be able to resolve - feather detail, eye lashes etc.

- Exposure - under exposure will punish you. ETTR will be your friend, but then you're shooting at an effectively lower ISO.

- Amount of PP. Any actions like shadow fill, sharpness enhancing, clarity, dehaze, increased saturation etc will quickly add noise.

- Mono - you can get away with murder in mono!

Personally, I think for landscape, cityscape, portraits and other more critical stuff then sticking to base ISO is the best strategy. Up to ISO 3200 on the mkii, well-exposed and with good glass is usually OK. ISO 6400 works for less critical stuff if you have to go that high, but large output will give it away.
__________________
Paul
E-M1ii, Pen-F and too many lenses
flickr
Portfolio Site
Instagram
Reply With Quote
The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to pdk42 For This Useful Post:
griffljg (13th January 2019), Zuiko (13th January 2019)
The Following Users Liked This Post:
DavyG (15th January 2019), MJ224 (13th January 2019), Ross the fiddler (15th January 2019), wornish (13th January 2019), Zuiko (13th January 2019)