View Single Post
  #14  
Old 26th May 2017
MargaretR's Avatar
MargaretR MargaretR is offline
Full member
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: South Lanarkshire
Posts: 789
Thanks: 230
Thanked 176 Times in 117 Posts
Likes: 82
Liked 382 Times in 145 Posts
Re: Master of photography

Quote:
Originally Posted by drmarkf View Post
Well having seen the first episode I thought things had improved quite a lot.

There was much more emphasis on the contestants' efforts to find good images, they'd ditched two of the previous judges (although keeping the grumpy Italian guy with the blue specs) and there was some specific and detailed discussion and proper criticism of the images. Much less airy-fairy pseudo-art speak, and I thought the overall standard of the contestants was higher. Nice locations, too.
Yes, as compared with series 1, it wasn't quite so awful. At least they got rid of the annoying (and pointless) 'hostess', who contributed nothing, and I actually liked some of the images taken this time, which I can't say of last series at all!

Still think we should know what makes the judges qualified to be in that slot though ... having never heard of any of them, they should put their money where their mouths are, and exhibit some of their own work as examples of what the contestants are striving for.
__________________
Margaret

my Website ; my Flickr ; my Facebook
Reply With Quote
The Following Users Liked This Post:
drmarkf (6th June 2017), OM USer (26th May 2017)